The High Court · 2025

1 . M/s Vengamamba Hotels and Resorts Private Limited, having its registered office at 4-3-302 to 308 Koti, l-lyderabad - 500001 Represented by its Authorized Signatory, Sri Peethanr Chitti Babu. S/o. Peethanr Satyanarayana, R/o Hyderabad

2. Sri M. Varaprasad Rao, S/o I\/1. Satyanarayana, Aged about 54 years, Occ. lVlanaging Director R/o H no 1-4-27,Flat no. 302, Eternal Lakshmi Ntlayam, Street no. 7, Habsiguda. Hyderabad- 500007 AND 1 2 State of Telangana, Represented by its Principle Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat. Hyderabad The Deputy Commrssioner of Police, Central Zone. ...PETITIONERS Assistant Commissioner of Police, Khairatabad Zone 3 4. Statron House Officer, Khairatabad PS. 5. M/s. Bagga Hotel Constructron LLP, (erstwhile Bagga Hotel Construction Pvt. Ltd.), incorporated under ihe provisions of Companies Act, 2013. and having its regrstered Office at 6-3-2481311285/'1999, Road No.1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, Telanaana. Represented by its Designated Partner Balvinder Singh Bagga, S/o. Late Shri Harmahender Singh Bagga, Aged about 48 years, R/o. Plot No 400, Road No. '14, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500034 ...RESPONDENTS Petrtion under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or dtrection, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of l\Iandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the acttons of Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in interfering with the personal life, and lrberty and businessoperationsmorepaiticular|ytnrespectofthePetitionersinrespectofa purely crvil dispute between the petitroner and unofficial respondents at the behest of unofficlal Responderrt No 5. and subjecting the Petitioners to continuous harassnrent threats. and coercion to lrrthdraw the legitirnately filed crvil suit, is rllegal, arb trary. unoonst tutlorlal arrd in gross vrolation of r\rticles 14' 19' and 21 of tlre Const tutton of lndta and conseqtrently direct the respondent No 2 to 4 not to nterfere wrth Itfe lberty and bustness operatlons more l)artlcularly rn respect of crvil disputes pendrng between petlttoner and respondent no 5 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavrt frled in support of the petrtion, the High court may be pleased to Direct the Respondent Nos 2 to 4. nrore partrcularly Respondent No'4 to not interfere with lrfe. lrberty and bUsrness operatlons more particularly in respect of ctvil disputes pendrng between petrttoner and respondent no.5 pendrng before the competent Civil Court and Drrect the Respondent Nos 2 to 4 to rmmediately stop harassrng threatenrng, and coercitrg the Petitroners and employees of Petitioner No.1 to withdraw the legitimately filed crvil strit and Direct the Respondents to not misuse or abuse their ,:fftcral posrtion and po\,ver to interfere in civil dtsputes between prtvate Parties. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. RAGHAVA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondents No 1 To 4: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No 5: ----- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR ORDER W.P, No.347O4 of 2O2S personal intcrfering s,ith the Questioning the action of the respondents No.2 to 4 in lilc ancl libcrt.,' of the petitioners anci subjecting thcm ro harassrnent to u,ithdrau, thc civil suit pending bctwecn the petitioners and the respondent No.5, petitioners filed the present u,rit pctitiort rvith a consecluential prayer to direct the respondents No.2 to 4 not to interfcrc with lil'e, liberty and business operations in respcct of civii disputes pendir-rg between the pctitioners and the responden r No.5.

2. The learned counsel for the peLitioners u,ould submit rhat thc petitioner No. I Company is engaged rn the business of operating hotel and being represcntcd by its authorizcd signatory and the petitioner No.2 is thc Managing Dircctut.. Duc rr_r various disputcs on the lease deed dated 12.1O.2022, entcrcd bet$.een the pctitioner No.1 and the respondent No.5, petitioner No.1 fited a civit suit lor recovery ol cer[ain money from the respondent No.S ancl the same is pending before thc concerned civil Court. Whilc so, thc respondents No.2 to 4, at the behest of the rcspondent No.S, are pressurizing the petitioners to withdraw the civil suit and persrstently calling on the petitioner No.2 and harassing him v'ith dire consequences with filing ol frivolous cases against him if the claim is not withdrawn. Hence, the petitioner;.filed thc present writ petition. 2

3. On thc other ha:td, the learned AssisLanl (]overnmcnt pleircler for Homc placr:cl a ,topv of thc u'ritter-r ilstrnctions dated 17.71.2025 ol thc Sr-rl>-Inst).)ctor ol Police, Khairtabarl Policc Statior-r, u.herein ir rs sl.rtc(i thliL llasc(l ,)n lt complainL lodg,,l lrr. the rcspcnclenl NO.5. respondenL No.,1 rnadc CID cntn' :rnd ltetition L:rrtr1 virlc Petition ID No 0O462, d:rted '21 .O9.2025. For tire pLrl)osc o[ cnquin. rcsponclent No..1 cirllcd the 1te titio|re rs trnd rrp|n e nclLritr. it rr,rs discloscd that the dispute bctlr.cen tl.rc comDlainant :tnd rhc petitioncrs is pr:rtaining to leascd prcmiscs arnd thc saunc t-as ciosecl as cilil in natrtrc on 15.1 \.2O2r. It is turthcr subrnirrt:rl thzrl Lit(. respondcDt No. 1, cxcept condLrcting cnqLrin on thr: coltrpllLinl lorlgccl b1,tht: rcspondclrt No.5, did not intcrferc in civil dispuLcs ald clir] not interfcre rvith the personal lifc and libertr and busincss operations ol Lhc pL:Litioncrs:Lnd did not harass thct.n to u.ithdlarv tlrc cir,il suil.

1. In thal r,iL:u, o[ the matter, recording thc submissions madc br, the lcarned counscl on either sicle ancl rvith thcir. oons(,nt, this rrrit petition is disposcd ol directing thc rcspor-rdcnts policc to follou due proccdure as contemplated under larv beforc initiating anv actior against thc petitioners.

5. Accordinglv, this rvrit petitior-r is disposcd of. Thcrc shall bc no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/-K. MADHAVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// S CTION OFFICER To, 'l . The Principle Secretary, Department of Home. State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of police, Central Zone. 3. Assistant Commrssioner of police, Khairatabad Zone. 4 Station House Officer, Khairatabad pS 5 One CC to SRt K RAGHAVA RATVANA Advocate [OpL,C] 6 Two CCs to Gp FOR HOME High Court for the State of 1'elangana at 7 Two CD Copies Dr\\ Hyderabad . [OUT] BS HIGH COURT DATED:2011112025 ORDER WP.No.34704 of 2025 R TilE S iA ?. ;i ta) l:() l\:;\\.1 ... i .\ ( 23 l'1[fl rl7 7 li:glt:l €O DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS [0 AL b b