The High Court · 2025

2 P.ya.lA f1dma, Wo. p. Anand Raj, Age. 52 years, Occ. House wife, Rl/o H.No. 1 3-5-790/tu67 1'1, Mustaidupuia, K"umarw5Oi, Ai,rnJgli, [ydlr;;;d' " " 3. Jaligama Saraswathi, Wo J^ali,qqma Narasimha Rao, Age. 61 years, Occ. Househotd, R/o. H.No 1_2_1"5/1/A, Sri Shivls;i -Cofonvl -- riuO-*e], Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, I9qi".qi,!* by her.GpA.purushotham Ganapathi Tekmat, S/o. Sridhar Rao uanaparnr teKmat. Aoe. 4l yearc, Occ. private Employee, Rl/o. H.No.15_246, Road No.8. MaruthinJgar, v6erpei, nJnga nedoy bliiict. _ AND ,| Sangu Jeethaiah, S/o. Sangu Narsimha, Ag 2-72 Khajipally Village, tDA Boilarani, 5 e.48 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Reddy District, Telangana ...APPELLANTS o ...RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER 2 The State of Telangana,.Rep. by its Secretary, Dept of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana Statd.

3. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District, Telangana State. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jinnaram Mandal, Sanga Reddy Diskict, ' ,, Telangana State.

5. The Tahsildar, Jinnaram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District, Telangana State. ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praytng that in the <;ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the rrrders passed by the learned single judge of this Hon'ble court in W.P.No. 27 289 of 2025, dated 11.O9.2025 pending disposal of the above writ appeal, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI S.SURENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI KONGALA MOHAN GOUD Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 5: SRI MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM, GP FOR REVENUE The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.L27L OF 2o25 Mr. S. Surcnder Reddy, leanred counscl appc.lnng 1br Lhe appellants. Mr. K. Mohan Goud, learned counsel appcarrng lor the respondent No- I N,lr Muralldh.rr Rcddy Katram, the learn('(l (}overnment Pleader for Rcvenue appearing for the rcsPondent Nos-2 to 5. JUDGMENT: {Pcr t'lon'blc Justice Nloushuml Bhattacharya) 1 . Thc Writ Appeal arises out ol an order dated 1 I .O9.2O25 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.27289 of 2025 The respondent No. I herein filed the Writ Petition seeking a

2. direction to the ofhcial respondents to consider the Online Application filed in Bhu Bharati Portal ulde lApplication No.25O0120482 dated 30.06.2025 for correction in the Bhu Bharati Porlal and to issue a nev",Pattada-r Pass Book in favor of respondent No.1/writ pe litioner in respect of his agricultural iands i.e., Ac.0.15 guntas in Survev No. 196 and Ac.0.17 guntas in Sur-vey No. 197, totaling Ac.0.32 guntas, situated at Khajipally Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Sangareddy District. By the impugned 2 order dated ll.Og.2O2S, the learned Single ._tudg,: clisposecl o[ thc Writ Petition by directing respondent No.3/thc Rr,r,enue Divisional Ofhcer, Jinnaram Mandal, Sangareddy District. lrt consrder and dispose of the said online application of the wnt pretitioner dated 30.06.2025 in accordance with law. The lcarncd Sirrgle .Judge further directecl that if respondent No.3 is not inctined to zrccept the request made by the writ petitioner, he shall assrgn specihc reasons, pass a reasoned order and communicaLc a r:rtp.y of the same to the writ petitioner and the entire excrcise r,,as rlrrected Lo be completed within 30 days lrom the date of rcr:t,ipL ol a copy of that order. 3 (W.P.No.27289 the appellants Learned counsel appearing for the appellar-r s sub,mits that were not made parties to the Wrr t. petition of 2O251 despite the fact that the rerspondent No.1/writ petitioner had earlier approached the cour.r and frled two Writ Petitions (W.p.No.2662 of 2024 and W.p.No.28-6 of 2024) in relation to the same lancl and had made 1hc appellants respondents thereto. It is further submitted that thc Wrir petitions were disposed of by orders dated os.o3.2o24 attcr o5.o2.2o24 respectively b1' directing the District Collector, Sanqrrr.ed6lv District ;d&&&*t 3 and the Tahsildar, Jinnaram Mandal, Sangareddy District, to consider the application of thc r,r,rit pctitioner for rectihcation of revenue entries and for issuance of e-pattadar passbook in respect of the subject property by providing an opportunity of hearing to all parties, including the appellants herein, within a specified time fra m e.

4. Counsel further submits that the appellant Nos. 1 and 2 hied W.A.No. 1046 of 2024 chaflerging the said order before a Co- ordinate Bench. By a judgment dated O5.O9.2024, the Co-ordinate Bench directed the District Collector, Sangareddy District, to consider the objections frled by the appellants after affording an opportunity of hearing to the appellant Nos. I and 2 as well as the respondent No.1/writ petitioner and not to pass arly order on the application dated O8. ).2.2023 un[it the objections fhled by the appellant Nos.l and 2 are considered. It is further submitted that the respondent No.1/writ petitioner has also approached the Civil Court and filed O.S,No.27 of 2025 against the appellants seeking a declaration of title, consequential injunction and rectiltcation of entries in the Revenue Records. According to counsel, the respondent No.1/writ petitioner would hence not have any cause of 4 action to approach the Writ Court once again b\ Writ Petition (W.p.No.27289 of 2025), which impugned order dated l1.Og.2O2S. u,ay of the third crr, nrrnated in the

5. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appeJ.lanis, lcarned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1/writ pe trlioncr ancl thc learned Government pleader for Revenue appearinSl for the State_ respondents. Learned counsel appearing for ttl€ No- 1/writ petitioner submits that the third Writ pe ition u.as lllcd in respect of different Survey Numbers. rcspondcnt

6. However, considering the overall facts and the lact that thc respondent No. 1/writ petitioner has already approached the Civil Court by filing a Suit agatnst the appellants ilnd solrght appropriate relief in respect of the suit schedule propr:rty, ,"rrc dccm it fit to only address the appellants, concern of not bcir-rg h,:ard b], the Rcvenue Divisional Officer, Jinnaram Mandal. W.: accorclingll, direct the respor]dent No.4/the Revenue Divisic nal rlfllcer, Jinnaram Mandal, to hear the appellants before con sidering an<l disposing of the application made by the respondent No. 1/,"r.rit petitione r. Needless to say, the Revenue Divisional (). ficer shall 5 pass a reasoned order and communicate a copy o[ the same to the respondent No. 1/writ petitioner as u'ell as the appellants herein, and shall complete Lhe entire exercisc within four weeks from thc date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. W.A.No.l27l of 2025 is accordingly disposed of in terms of the above. All connec[ed applications shall also stald disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The Secretary, Dept of Revenue' Secretariat' Hy State of Telangana' Sd/.A.V.S. PRASAD D PUTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER bad, Telangana State' Telangana State

2.TheDistrictCollector,sangaReddyDistrict,TelanganaState- 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer' Jinnaram Mandal' Sanga Reddy District' 4. The Tahsildar, Jinnaram Mandal' Sanga Reddy District' Telangana State 5. One CC to SRI S.SURENDER REDDY' Advocate IOPUCI 6. One CC to SRI KONGALA MOHAN GOUD' Advocate [OPUCI 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE' High Court for the State of Telangana at o Hyderabad [OUT]

8. Two CD CoPies BSR PMK HIGH COURT DATED: 1711112025 JUDGMENT WA.No.1271 of 2025 oR lrri: $ r.,i r) (. 2 t tluv 15 a t 7_ {+ Oe, S rr. r'Crt-- o t t, DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL, WITHOUT COSTS '0) \ t,a d,,