The High Court · 2025

Smt. Deshpande Neeta, W/o. Vinayak Deshpande, Ar g; 39 years, Occ: Housewife, Rl/o. House No.5-2-1 3B/P36-N, Sneh; mainagar, Beside Akhilandeswarinagar, Near old Rohith School, Vanasthalip "rram, Ranga Reddy District. ...Petition rrlRespondent No.i AND

1. Vinayak Deshpande, S/o. Chandrakanth Deshpande, , rge: 41 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. Survey No. 107, Chidri Road, Old Adarsh Colony, Motte Layout, Bidar, Karnataka-S8s 401.

2. Smt. Shobha Deshpande, , W/o. Chandrakanth Deshp,: nde, Age: 54 years, Occ: Govt. Employee, Rl/o, Survey No. 107, Chidri Road Old Adarsh Colony, Motte Layout, Bidar, Karnataka-s8s 401.

3. Chandrakanth Deshpande, S/o. Vital Rao Deshpande, \ge: 62 years, Occ: Retired Govt. Employee, Fl/o. Survey No. 107, Chidr Road, Old Adarsh Colony, Motte Layout, Bidar, Karnataka-s8s 401

4. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prose: rtor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad, Through the Women Police S:ation, Saroornagar, Rachakonda ...Respondents/Petitioner s/Respondent No.2 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. he High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to compound thr: s1Jsn.. in C.C.No. 8857 of 2021 , on the file of the Court of the Hon'ble lll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar, punishable t nder Section 498-A IPC Sections 3 and 4 of D.P Act. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying thal ir the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, 1e High Court may be pleased to record the Memorandum of Compromise by d.r y compounding the offence in C.C. No. 8857 of 2O21 , on the file of the Court of 1 re Hon'ble lll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing :[ e Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumentr; tf Mr. p. Vinod Lal, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor. on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Mr. Venkata Srinivasa Rao Kaj,a Advocate for the Respondent No.'1 . The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENryAS RAO I.A.Nos.2 attd 3 of 2O25 IN AND CRIMINAL PETI TION No.1 5lO8 of2O25 Date: O4.1 2.2025 Between: Vinayak Deshpande and two others Smt.Dcshpande Neeta and another AND Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 3 Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been hled by petitioners / accused Nos. 1 to 3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.8857 of 2021, on the hle of the IiI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

2. Mr.P.Vinod Lal, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal petition, at the instance of the well wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the dispute and entered into compromise and hled Joint Memo. Accordingry, respondent No. 1 filed I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2o2s to permit them to compound the offences and to record the compromise respectively. 2

3. This Court uide order, dated 19 .ll .2O2:; directed the parties i.e., the pet-itioners and respondent No.1, to ap pear before the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabacl. on or before 27 .11 .2025. [n compliancc of the said order, thc I ;ecretary, High Court Legal Senrices Committee, has submittec report, dated

26.11.2025, stating that the petitioners and resport lent No. 1 were duly identihed with copies of their Aadhar Cards. It i ; further stated that the parties i.e- petitioners and respondent No have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise.

4. Mr.Venkata Srinivasa Rao Kaja, learne ,l counsel for respondent No.1 has stated that he is not having a -iy objection to quash the proceedings against the petitioners

5. The parties herein have hled Joint Memo alon6; rith I.A.No.3 of

2025. The said Joint Memo and the report o' the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, {yderabad, are placed on record.

6. In view of the said report and also in view of he compromise entered between the petitroners and respondent No as well as the submissions made kry the respective parties, I.A.Nos.l I and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in C.C.1'l >.8857 of 2021, on the hle of the III Additional Metropolitan Magistretr :, Ranga Reddy District at L.I3.Nagar, are hereby quashecl against the petitioners/ accused Nos.1 to 3. / / J 7 . Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1O,0O0/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee and Rs.S,OOO/- (Rupees five thousand only) lo the Teiangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioners within one week from today. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/. A.JAYASR ASSISTANT REG //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER istrict, at The lll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Red L.B.Nagar. The V Additional Metropolitan Megistrate, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar. The Station House Officer, Saroomagar WpS, Rachakonda Commissionerate. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to Mr. P. Vinod Lal, Advocate tOpUCI One CC to Mr. Venkata Srinivasa Rao Kaja, Advocate tOpUCI Two CD Copies (Along with a Copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) Total Amount of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Mr. P. Vinod Lal, counser for the petitioner as directed. by the Hon'ble court vide order daled 04-12-2025 as Rs. jO,0O0/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the High Court Legal Services Committee and Rs. S,0OO/- ( Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 141208 of 2O2S dated 17-12-2025. To, 1 2 J 4 5 ,r, N$t KAM HIGH COURT JSR, J DATED:0411212025 ) c l {r o .j'

4., N' 5, e' Ci =e 6: -c .(l ,l- .' ..r' J tTnrr-l COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.15108 of 2025 ALLOWING BOTH l.As AND CRIMINAL PETITION 0\ v D IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, AT HYDERABAD Betwebn: CRL. P. No. of 2025 Smt. Deshpande Neeta. W/r a_b; I Jo"yea ;; aI',!; Y,li,],i; ffi : 3.seq No,. 5-2-138/p36-N, Snehamainagar, l3eside Akhitandeswarinasar. Near nJniiit.nair. Vanasthalipuram, Ranga neOAV Oistriit. , And "io rr.*t? Petitioner/Respondent No. 1 I YTI.| Deshpande, S/o. Chandrakarrth Deshpande. ,"=, aged about 4t years, occ: erivate. iin.'iii;-.'r", R/0. survey No. 107, Ctriori noao, rji.ilirurrfi coro., -'"" vv'v,,v, Motte Layout, Bidar, Karnataka-sbs +oi.

2. Smt. Shobha Deshpande. Wo. Charrdrakanth Deshpande, aged about 54 years, occ: Govt. eripror"l'"' "-,'r. R/o. Survey No. 107, Chidri Road^olf,io-u'irn cotonu -''| sv'v' rv, Motte Layout, Bidar, Karnataka-SdS .fOi]*'

3. Chandrakanth Deshpande, S/o. Vita; I{ao Deshpande, aged about 62 years, Occ: ietired Go;: Er;ffi":= R/o. Survey No. 107, CniarinoaO, C,i;;;;#A;i, * -" vv,v,tv, Motte Layout, Bidar, Karnataka_sbs act.

4. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its;--ublic prosecutor. High Court of Telaiqana- Hyderabar:l, Through the Wlmen police Station, saroJrnagar, Racf,ar,,irCa. -l]'' '"ilponOents/petitioners 1 to 3 & Respondent No.2,- I o N UM R MI t: BRIEF OF THE

1. It is submitted that the petitir,ner herein lodged a complaint dated 71.08.2021, before the 4h Respondent herein i.e., Women police Station, Saroonagar, Ranga Reddy District, against the Respondents 1 to 3 hetein and in --=t '! I t I I I I t i l i I I I j l i I I I I I I I l I I I I : I i l I I i I i l l i l I I 2 ') turn the 4h Respondent herein registered the same as F"' 1: No' 306 of 2o2l' dated 11.08.2021 and after investigation the 2nd responder:filed Charge Sheet' . vide C.C. No. BB57 of 2021, on the iile of the Court of lre Hon'ble III Addl" Metropolitan Maiistrate, Ranga Redciy Dfstiict' at L'B' NE larl for the offences )n 3 i nd 4 of the D:P' Act' pun'rstrdble unclei Section 498-A of Crl'P'C'' read Sectit against the ieipondents No 1 to 3 herein'- ; I submit during the pendency ot C'C' No' 8857 of ;l r21' on the file of the 2. court of the Hon,ble III Addl. Metropofitan Magistrate, Ra rga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar, the petitioner herein and the Respondents 1 t ) 3 herein have come to a compromise, at the instance of the elders and well wi hers and entered into Memo.randum of Compromise and the sarne may read as lart and pricel of this affidavitandthepetitionerhereinagre':dtowithdrawtlecomplaint'pending' vide C.C. No. BB57 of 2O2L on the file of the Court o'the Hon'ble III' Addl' Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy i''istrict' at L'B' Nae lr'

3. In view of the above said facts and circumstance:s ' the C'C' No' 8857 of 2021, on in" nt" of the Court of the Hon'bie III' Addl' t' etropolitan Magistrate' Ranga Reddy District, at L'B' Nagar is io be compromisr: I and sworn affidavit is also filed along with petition, as suclr this Hon'ble Crl rrt may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein as well as the responclr nts 1 to':J herein to compromise the case, in the interest r.li justice, by duly:;r tting aside the C.C. No. BB5Tof2O2l,anthefileoftheCorlrtoftheHon'blelli.Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, Ra nga Reddy Dist \.v u6 L.B. Nagar. ,4;) -P :3: It is therefore prayed in the il'iterest of justice tl lat this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to record the Memorandum of Compromise entered behveen the Detitioner and the iespondents 1 to 3 herein' by duty 5s1:25ide the c.c. No' BB57 ';f 'o:t' "-tl" :t.T"_::': r:j:. Hon'ble III. Addl' Metropolitan Magistrate' Ranga Reddy Districb at L'B' Il'agar' and pass such other and further order: or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case' t: fi,v. COUNSEL FOR ov) ErrnONER. I ,*ffig1*, HPAN RESPONDENTNO. i. (SHOBHA DESHP RESPONDENT ANDE) No.2. n (l'l/"' ,-d (CHAND RE RAKANTI+DESHP'ANDE) SPONDENT I..IO. 3. COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOS' 1TO 3' ; I -I