The High Court · 2025

Itrt/s Maona lnfratech (lndia) Prt. Ltd.,, having l!9 office presently-at Flat ,,*,1*r:,:y,"*:ixit*ulBi5:;3I::;;5'3i,lHLi,l:$'13I1i"5&':"J Directors. 1.Sri Madadi Kondal Rao S/o Sri Narayana Rao, ?geg 69 years' Rlio Plot No)e6, ilmaiapuiiiotony' Near Sri Nalar Colony, Hyderabad' 2. Sri Allam Prathap Reddy S/o A.Rayapa Reddy, aged about 56 years' ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal.Secretary, Revenue (Regn and Stamps) Departmeht, Secretariat, Hyderabad'

2. The Commissioner and lnspector General of, Registration and Stamps, Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad' 4. The Joint Sub-Registrar-|, Ranga Reddy District. 5. The Joint Sub-Registrar-ll, Ranga Reddy District. 6. G.Amarnath Reddy S/o late G.Sidda Reqqy, O.cg.Bqsiness, Fi/o H'No 3-5- - 1119t11, Rajmohaila Road, Kachiguda X Road, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition' uhder Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction ;nore in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in entertaining the deed of cancellation of General Power of Attorney and registering the same vide document No.1943/2015 daled 13-2;-2015 whereby the Development agreement cum General Power of Attorney bearing document No.684B/2013 dated 8-4-2013 executed by th,: Respondent No.6 in favour of the Petitioner company has been unilaterally can,lelled without any knowledge and without issuing any notice to the petitioner company in respect of property admeasuring 0-B guntas or 968 Sq. yards out of A:. 0-21 guntas in Sy.No. 57 (Part) situated at Khanamet village, serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, corltrary to the instructions issued by the 2nd Respondent vide circular Memo No.G.t/can/4o2:.812020 dated 31-3-2010 and Rule 26(ixk)(i) of AP Registration Rules, 1908 apart from violative of principles of natural justice and also contrary to law laid down ty the Honble Apex court in Thota Ganga Laxmi Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh (cA No. 317 ot 2OO7 dated 13-7-2010) reported in 2012(3) ALT 50 (sc) and consequently the deed of cancellation of General Power of Attorney bearing document No.1943/2015 daled 13-2-2015 executed by the Respondent No.6 be cancelled as the same is void and nonest in the eye of law' l.A. NO: 2 OF i:015 (WPMP. NO:219 37 0F 2015) Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Responderrts not to give effect to the deed of Cancellation of General Power of Attorney bearirrg document No.1943/20'15 daled 13-2-2015 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. l.A. NO: 1 OF i1015 (WVMP. NO: 2134 O 2015) F Between: G.Amarnath Reddy S/o late G.Sidda Reddy, Occ Business, R/o H.No.3-5-1 1 t 9/1 1 , Rajmohata Ro;ad, Kachiguda X Road, rro"r"o"l ..r=TlrtoNER/5rH REspoNDENT AND

1. The Stale of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Regn and Stamps) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Cornmissioner and lnspector General of, Registration and Stamps, Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. The Dislrict Registrar, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. 4. The Joirrt Sub-Registrar-|, Ranga Reddy District. 5. The Joirrt Sub-Registrar-ll, Ranga Reddy District. ,..RESPONDENTS/RESPONDNETS tr//s Magna lnfratech (lndia) Pvt._Ltd.,, having..its office presently^at Flat N6.oi, Loir" ebi[-c, tr,tighum opqs, pvQel^1i11,^49jacent .to HP Petrol pump,'Onn iunctioir, OaCniOo*li, HVdeiabaO-SOO 032, R-ep. by its Authorized Directors. 6. Sri t\Iadadi Kondal Rao S/o Sri Narayan^a .Rao,.qggd 6.0 years, RI/o Plot l',to.ZgO, Kimatapuri Colony, Near Sri Nagar Colony, Hyderabad. 7. Sri Allam Prathap Reddy S/o A.Rayapa Reddy, aged about 5p years, ..PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt.15.06.2015 passed in W.P.M.P.No.21937 of 2015 in W.p.No.16g11 of 2e15 and dismiss the writ petition as the same is devoid of merits. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. RAVI KIRAN RAO counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: AGP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI S SRIDHAR The Court made the following: ORDER I \ \ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.16911 OF 2015 ORDEFI: This; Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief/s:- T \ "....tr issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of vVrit of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in entetaining the deed of cancellation of General power of Attomey and registering the same vide documents No.1g4gl2o1s, dated 1g.o2.2ols whereby the Development agreement cum General power of Attorney bearing No.6848/2013, dated 08.04.2013 executed by the Respondeni No.6 in favour of the petitioner company has been unilaterally cancelled without any knowledge and without issuing any notice to the petitioner company in respect of property admeasuring 0-g guntas or g6g sq. yards out of Ac.o.21guntas in sy.No.s7 (part) situated at Khanamet Mllage, serlingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District as iltegal, contrary to the instructions issued by the 2d respondent vide circular Memo No.G;.!/canl4028l2o1o, dated 31.03.2010 and Rute 26(ixkxi) of Ap Regi:stration Rules, 1908 apart from viorative of principies of natural justice and also contrary to law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex court in Thota Ganga Laxmi vs Government of Andhra pradesh (cA.No.317 of 2007 dated 13.07.2010) reported in 2012(Z) ALT SO (SC) and consr-3quently the deed of cancellation of General power of Atiorney bearing document No.1943/201s dated 13.02.201s executed by th6 respondent No.6 be cancelled as the same is void and nonest in the ele of law and pass...." 2- Learned'counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and seeks to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous.

3. Learned Assistant Government pleader for stamps and Registration appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5 takes no objection to the same. 2

4. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if dny, shall stand closed To, /TRUE COPY/ SD/. A.SRINIV IS REDDY ISTRAR CTION OFFICER Ji One CC to Sri V. Ravi Kiran Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Stamps And Registration, High Cou Telangana, at HYderabad [OUT] the State of

3. One CC to Sri S. Sridhar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies TJ BSR st{ I I i I a t I { P,r- S 0 E ttB ttftt * cli r) l"r-r ' ir-. *4:. n i) ? ., HIGH COTJRT DATED i21r10812025 ORDER WP.No.1ei91 1 of 2015 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCT'UOUS WITHOUT COSTS CI^g ?o