The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings of the exeeution of the Judgment a1! decree passed in tr/VOP No.190 of 2018, dated 28.09.2022, on the file of MACT cum ll AdOitional District and Sessions Judge, Khammam pending disposal of the above appeal in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI KONDADI AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: _ The Court madrl the following: JUDGMENT r IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO M.A.C.M.A.No 74L OF Date: o5.L2.2025 Between: Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Represented by its Branch Manager, Nizamabad District. AND Smt. Dandugula Laxmi and three others. i' JUDGMENT: ...Petitioner "'ResPondents Pursuant to the request made by the learned counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter was referred to Lok Adalat. On 13.09.2025, the matter was settled between the parties and an award to that effect was passed by the Lok Adalat. In view of the above, the M.A.C.M.A. is disposed of in 2. terms of the award, dated 13.09.2025, passed by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- M JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE GOPY//

1. The Chairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-ll Additional District \ To, Judge, Nizamabad.

2. One CC to Sri KondadiAjay Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] O 3. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED: 0511212025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.741 ot 2022 () c) ( * I 1 I Hr\fl ?-l.!?fi t Fl DISPOSED OFF IN TERMS OF AWARD PAS$ED BY LOK ADALAT I HlGl-l ' lnlcn couRT FOR TH ATE O.F 6ru nder Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)l r+isl{'cnu?17 LOK ADALI\"I {, '$ir-,.ii-; .S13& oi1 * 1 25 Present: 1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devj, (Former Judge, Hon,ble High Court for thi State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member (Before the Hon,bte High Court) AGAINST (onthefil.eofthe*o.o.o...ffiistrictJuclge)atNizamabad) Between:- iIACMA No.694 of 2022

1. Smt- Danduguta Laxmi, W/o.Danduta Narsiaah, Aged about 44years, Occ: Housewife, 2- Danduguta Narsaiah, s/o.Budenna, Aged about 4fyears, occ: Labour, 3. Danduguta Prakash, s/o.D.Narsaiah, Aged about zi years, occ: student, At[ are R/o.H.No.2 -10/ 101, Mamidipat[y Vittage, Maktoor Mandal, Nizamabad District. . . . Appellants/Petitioners

1. Sirsu Venkawa, W/o.Narsaiah, Aged: ."j): Occ: Owner of the Auto bearing No" TS_i6_UB-423g, R/o.H.No. 5-49, Ramchandrapatty Vittage of Maktoor Mandat, Dist. Nizamabad. 7. Shriram General Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Branch Office, D.No.5-6-5708,znd Ftoor, Axis Bank auitalng, Near Hote[ raiita, HvJeiiuaa Road, Nizamabad Town, Nizamabad District. ... RespondentslRespondents llACrtrtA. No. 741 of 2022 Between:- Shriram Genera[ Co.Ltd., Branch Office D.No.5-6-5708, Znd Hoor, Axis Bank Buitding, Near. Hotel.t-{pila, Hyderabad Road, Nizamabad, Rep. by LegatManager, H.No.3 -o-tg, 4In Floor, sai Datta Arcade, street No.6, Himayathnagar, t{yc"rabad. AND 1. Smt. Dandugula Laxmi, W/o.Danduta Narsaiah, Aged 40 years, Occ: House wife, 2. Danduguta Narsaiah, S/o.Buddenna, Age 45 years, Occ: labour, 3. Danduguta Prakash, S/o.D.Narsaiah, Age 20 years, Occ: Student, At[ are R/o.H.No.2 -10/101, Mamidpatty Vittage of Maktoor Mandat, Dist.Nizmabad. ..Appellant/Respr.rnder,t No. 2

4. Sirsu venkawa, w/o.Narsaiah, Age Major, occ: owner of rhe Auto bearing No. T5-1 6-U8-4738, R/o.H. No. 5-49, Ramchandrapal,l.y Vittage of Maktoor Mandal, Dist. Nizamabad. . . Respondents/petitioners counser ror the Appeuants/craimants / petitionerr, fiTrTii:IfiTf::iij.ll;' Counse[ for Respondent No.2/ lnsurance. Campany : Sri K.Ajay Kumar, Advocate. Representative of lnsurance company : sri Mohammed Babu, Manager, These appeats having been referred'for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counset for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: r f t I i ) I alwAEU Awarded by the Tribunal Compensation .Awarded (Setttement Reached) in the Lok Ada.at. Rs.8,74,000/- (Rupees Eight takhs Seventy-four thousand interest al 9% per annum from the date of petition titt the deposit. MACMA No.694 of 2027 has been preferred by the Ctaimants/Petitioners and MACMA No.741 of 7O22has been preferred by the lnsurance Company aggrieved by the order passed in MVOP No.190 of 2018 by the Motor Accident Ctaims Tribunal. (ll Addt. District Judge) At Nizamabad. Sri Mohammed Babu, Manager for the Appettant/Respondent No.2- lnsurance Company has appeared bef"ore the Lok Adatat and represented that the Appettant/Petitioner/Ctaimant Nos. 1 to 3 have appeared before the District LegaI Services Authority, Nizamabad. It is reported that during the pendency of both Appeats, the Appel.Lants/Petitioners/Ctaimants and Appettant/ Respondent No.Z- lnsuran,:e Company represented that they have mutuatty entered into a compromise and settted the matter. ln pursuance of the same, the Appel,tants/Petitioners/Ctaimants have agreed to receive an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six lakhs onty) in addition to the amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Company towards futl and final setttement of their ciaim and the lnsurance Company has agreed to pay the same towards futt and final setttement of the ctaim. Accordingty, compromise l.rr.'i.i Cr'1i ji !.-Q1( ,r',.;r;.;-r1. t- 't.,',r,";.;1 is recorded and the Award is passed before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the above said setttement, the lnsurance Company has agreed to deposit the above said amount within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Award, after deducting the amount that was deposited, if any. ln the event of defautt or detay in making such deposit, the Claimants/Appettants/ Petitioners are entitled to claim interest as awarded by the Tribunat. Apportionmert of Compensatior, if any The apportionment among the Appettant/Petitioner/Ctaimant Nos.1 to 3 shatl be made as per the apportionment determined by the Tribunal in MVOP.190 of 2018. AdditionaI Di rection (s):

1. The A:pettantsiPetitioners are entitted to the refund of Court Fee paid in this case. credit to. 7-. The arnount atready deposited by the tnsurance Company, if any, shatt be given

3. Soon itfter deposit by the lnsurance Company, the Appettant/Petitioner/Claimant Nos.1 [o 3 are permitted to withdraw their entire share amounts. ln tokr:n of consent for the above settlement and award, the parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence. ln terrrs of the compromise arrived at between the parties, both the appeaLs i.e.; ,a _^l MACMA Ncr.694 of 2022ancl MAClrrtA No.741 of Zazlstand disposed of A ,#tfff , { .-.'-'_---- '_-_ -_:_-.'' _ :_-:::-i:-:-.1:-:::r_';':'-l -"- ' cr,1Anlo: +:+tl" q 6n) V oP cASENo. tq0 %tk 54 I ID {td Al Applicant (s) (!.-urr*-xl Respondent (s) /9^^-.-. G^r-{ Pr-P0%- 4U,?2,bt0+) i ., lnsurance Co. L' : Signalr'1 ?e'D ?ak'Yl^. i ;i * I , 1 f { : I { I t i I : : I i Counsel for applican (s) Counselfor respondent (s) t )' S'=Fi,r'ir t a,--- * -oS/ i N MEMBER ,fl* CHAIRMAN C$) '' i ",' (