G v. Saaketh S/o.G. vs Shesha Srin ivasa Charyulu Aged about

Petrtron under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated rn the [/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be please,rl to call for the records relating to Crime No 233 of 2024 on the file of the Ivlahan Kali Police Station, Hyderabad. l.A. NCl: 1 OF 2025: Krrshnagirr Varsha, D/o. K.Anil Kumar, Aged aboul22 years. occ. Software En,lrneer. R/o.Parsigutta Marn Road, Hyderabad. ... Petitioner/Res pondent in l.A No.1 and 2 ol 2025 1 G.V.Saaketh, S/o.G.V Shesha Srinivasa Charyulu Aged about 24 years. occ. Business, R/o. H. No.6-8-3212. Bhrahmana Wada Near Amrutha Theatre, .lanumakonda, Hanumakonda district. ...RespondenUPetitioner/Accused l.A No.1 and 2 ot 2025 t

2. lhe State ol Telangana represented by its Public Pro:,ecutor High Court for the State ofTelangana at Hyderabad. ..Respondent l.A No.1 and 2 oI 2025 Petrtion under Section 359(2) r/w 528 of BNS S praying that in the circurr'stances stated in the t\/emorandum of Grounds of Crinrtna Petition, the High Court rray be pleased to permit the petitioner/2nd resportdent to compound the offens:: registered agarnst the respondents/petitioners/accL.ls,ed registered against hrm u/s 376(2) (N) 42 506 tPC rn crime no 233 of 2024 datel 23 11 2024 on the file of mahankali police station Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 : Petition under Section 359(6) r/w 528 of BNSS; praying that in the circurnstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of CrrTrinal Petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to record compromise in crlp '15532 01' 2024 and quash the proceeCings rn cnnre 233 of 2024 on the file of Mallernkalr Police Station Hydera bad. Thrs Petition comrng on for hearrng, upon perusing the lVlemorandum of Grouncls of Crrmrnal Pet;tion and upon hearing the argumenls of Sri A.Prabhakar Rao. /\dvocate for the Petitroner and Additional Public Pros,:c;utor on behalf of the Respcndent No.1 and of Sri Medikonda Kondala Rac. Advocate for the Respondent No 2 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.15532 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNS by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceeding against him in Crime No.233 of 2024 on the file of Mahankali Police Station Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376 (2) (n),420,506 lPc.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 ot 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 06.10.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identificalion and to submit a report. 4 Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal 2 Services Committee, has identified the parties anrl submitted a - report, dated 13.10.2025 and the same is placed cn record ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2075 are allowed.

5. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allorved and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused Crime \o.233 of 2024 on the file of Mahankali Police Station Hyderabac, registered for the offences punishable under Section 376 (2) (n) .120 506 lPC, are herebY quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending shall stand closed .I]. PONNA KRISHNA ;ISTANT REGISTRAR. -- - /'- { a SDrt' //TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER \ To, 1 2 3 4 llh,,-1

5. 6 \5,s4 the Xlth Addrtronal Chief lVetropolitan t\,4agistrate at 36;Lrnderabad' The Station House Offrcer t\Iahankali Police Station, 111'derabad' Two CCs to the Publrc Prosecutor. High Court for the st:te of Telangana, at* Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to Srr A Prabhakar Rao. Advocate [OPUC] rlne CC to Sri lvledikonda Kondala Rao, Advocate [OPIJC] -two CD CoPies (-\long $ ith a copl ol loinl \lcmo) HIGH COURT DAT'ED:1 611012025 - COMMON ORDER LA Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.15532 of 2024 oR llE S14 1 rA ( o o 2 ;t rot, m6 * ot trrr rr rrEO (1\ C n ALLOWING THE I.A NOS.1 AND 2 OF 2025 AND CRIMINAL PETITION 6,\ { \1 1\ \\ IN THE TIIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT TTYDERABAD Crl.P.No. 15532 of2024 Befween: Krishnagiri Varsha D/o.K.Anil Kumar, Aged about 22 years, occ: Softrvare Engineer, R /o.Parsigutta Main Road, Hyderabad. And ..Petitioner / Respondent 1 2 G. V. Saaketh S/o.G. V. Shesha Srin ivasa Charyulu Aged about 24 years. occ: Business, R/o.H.No.6-8-32l2. Bhrahmana Wada Near Amrutha Theatre. Hanumakonda, Hanumakondadistrict. ....Respondent/Petitioner/Accused The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of for the State of Telangana, At Hyderabad. JOINT MEMO Respondent It is submitted that on the intervention of the well wishers friends and relatives and caste elders the disputes belween them were amicably sorted out. The elders advise the petitioner/ respondent not to prosecute the criminal case registered against the ltespondent/ petitioner/ Accused and for betterment of the Accused and R2 individual life as the petitioner /accused afld the rvell wishers settle the disputes amicable betlveen the respondent/Accused and they are for the befferment of their relationship. The petitioner have no interest to prosecute the above Criminal case against the petitioner/rcspondent/Accused. The said crimiral proceedings may be quashed in the interest of justice in Crl. q \ P.No. 15532 o12024 and cannot be claim anlthing asainst the petitioner and future . The defacto complainant/ accordinglri the petitioner/R2 is agreed not to prosecute the criminal casc registered against Respondent/Petitioner/Accuse Under Sections 376( l) (n), 420, 506 IPC. as they are settled amicabty as the both side community elders are settled the matter with both of them. It is submitted that the petitioner/2'd resportcient have amicably settled the dispute at the intervention o I elders a rtl well wishers and friends and caste elders the matter has been comprontised between them. Hence the both parties came to compromise in lr,r above Crl.P.No. 15532 of 2024 aganst Crime No. No.233 o(' -024 on the file of Mahankali Police Station Hyderabad registered ar ainst the respondent /Accused Under Sections ll6Q) (n), 420, 506 IPL' and both the parties have no claims or rights against each other in fuLtl: and the accused and respondent are lived their individual lile and t o ;rttthorilv to each o them. f/"'ituil, G.V.Saaketh Respondent/Petitioner/Accused ' t l-' ,.- / \l:1'' K.Vaisha Petitioncr' R espondent No. 2 Defacto complainant RespondenVPetitioner/Accused Counse Petition Defacto I lor ondent No. 2 c ompl