✦ High Court of India · 09 Dec 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 09 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
09 Dec 2025
Length
1,034 words

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cot direct the respondent No.6 to consider the representation ( 1510912025, to provide the protection the life and liberty provide the police protection of the petitioner's landed prop the lnjunction Order in LA.No.40 of 2025 in O.S.No.22 of 2 Honourable Junior Civil Judge, Yadad ri-Bhongiri Distri,; respect of the petitioners land in Sy.No.50/A/'1 to an exterrt is situated at Kothulapuram Village. Samastha-Narayanapu Bhongir District pending disposal of the writ petition :ircumstances stated 't may be pleased to I the petitioner dated to the petitioner. to :rty by implementing )25 on the tile of the at Choutuoppal in of Ac. 1.31 gts which I am Mandal, Yadadri- Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to6: GP FOR HOME, Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 7to11:- The Court made the following: ORDER t \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAI) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.34855 of 2O2S DATE OF ORDER: o,9.12.2o25 Between: Vardam Jangaiah, S/o Mallaiah, aged about 43 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o H.No. 10- 105, Lingavarigudem Village, Narayanpur Mandal, yadadri-Bhongiri District. .AND ...Petitioner I The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and ten others ...Responde nts ORDER: Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Junior Civil Judge at Choutuppal by order dated 04.02.2025 it I.A.No.4O of 2C25 in O.S.No.22 of 2025 granted ad-interim injunction and that the injunction orders are subsisting till date. a i i i i l I I I I I

2. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to file appropriate application before the concerned Court seeking police protection.

3. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is c ,sposed of with consent granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue t le remedies as tr2ri available under law

4. With these observations, writ petition is dispost,r of. No costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in tJ'r s writ petition shal1 stand closed St) .P. PONNA KRISHNA /\ASri ISTANT REGISTRAR ..-------- SECTION OFFICER I //TRUE COPY// To, T.S.,Hyderabad. 'l . The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretaria' 2. The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Hydt: 3. The Commissioner of Police, Rehakonda Commissione 4. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Bhongiri Zone, Fi Commissionerate. Yadadri-Bhongiri District. Commissionerate,

5. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Choutuppal Zor 6. The Station House Officer, Samasthan-Narayanapura l 7. One CC to SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Advocate [OPUI 8. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State , Rachakonda Police Commissionerate. Hyderabad [OUTI

9. Two CD Copies Building, Secretariat, abad. 'ate, Hyderabad. rhakonda Police :, Rachakonda Police Police Station, I f Telangana at t BM \+ I HIGH COURT DATED:0911212025 ORDER WP.No.34866 of 2025 ---\-: li: 5 /r',l IF' -t. )s. ;3o ( ! o rJ ',,it \ )( \i ]AN 1iil0 ?, .Z ) l' ,,/ '/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I "d# V w ffi* ":li,-. :,:rr,.i]{, _: :: j. :.. :_,

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments