Thota Krishna v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of There shall
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of There shall be no order as to costs.
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Tahsildar, Chilpur Revenue Mandal, Jangaon District, the 4th respondent herein, in not considering the Bhu Bharathi application no. 2500002947, dated 0310512025, made by the petitioner herein and not issuing the e-Passbook in respect of the missing extent of land admeasuring Ac. O-21 guntas in survey number 394/A of Kistajigudem Village, chilpur Revenue Ivlandal, Jangaon District as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Article 300-4 of the constitution of lndia, consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 herein to rectify the revenue records and issue e-Passbook in respect of the missing extent of land admeasuring Ac. 0- 21 guntas in survey number 394/4 of Kistajigudem village, chilpur Revenue I\/andal, Jangaon District. - --l !-- i I 1 / IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 herein to rectify the revenue records an,l issue e Passbook in respect of the missing extent of land admeasuring Ac. 0 21 guntas in survey number 394/A of Kistajigudem Village, Chilpur Revenue Manlal, Jangaon fiPtttict, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ASHOK REDDY KANATHALA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL 1VRIT PETITION No.34485 of 2o25
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed praying ttris Court to declare the action of respondent No.4 in not considering the petitioner's application bearing No.2500002947, dated 03.05.2025 for incorporating the missing extent of Ac.0.2l guntas in Sy.No.394/A situated at Kistajigudem Village, Chilpur Revenue Mandal, Jangaon District and consequential issuance of e-pattadar passbook in favour of the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 300-A oi Constitution of India and consequently, direct respondent No.4 to consider the petitioner's application and for other appropriate reliefs.
Heard Sri Ashok Reddy Kanathala, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and with their consent, this Writ Petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
father of the petitioner is the absolute owner of land \ 2 EVV, J \t'p 311E5_2025 admeasuring Ar:s.5.21 guntas in Sy.No.394 of i(istajigudem Village, Chilpur Revenue Mandal, Jangaon Distr:ct, having e acquired the sarne from his ancestors. Learned corrrtsel for the petitioner wo ulcl further submil that the revenLl( authorities also incorporated his name in the revenue records, and issued title deed uide Patta No. 170 under the provis ions of the Telangana Right.s in Land and Pattadar Passbook; Act, 1971. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further subntit lhat new pattadar pzrssbook No.T23020070054 was is; Lred only to the extent of Ac.5.00 guntas and remaining exten. of land i.e. Ac.O.21 guntas was missing. Therefore, the petrtioner made online Bhu Bharati Application No.25000029'17, dated
03.05.2025 lor entering the missing extent ol land and consequential issuance of new pattadar passborll:. The grievance of the petitioner is that, even after receipt of the said representation, respondent No.4 did not consider th 3 same.
Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents has not <lisputed the submission of the online application and it is stated that the application submitted by the petitioner fulf.l:; all the E\'\" J wp_3{185_)015 requirements under law, the respondent authorities will consider the same In view o; 15s afove submissions, this Court, without 5. going into merits of the case, deems it appropriate to dispose of a the writ petition directing tlre respondent authorities to conduct enquiry on the petitioner's application uide application No.2500002947, d,ated 03.05.205 by issuing notice to all the stakeholders and after affording an opportunity of hearing to them and if the petitioner satisfied all the requirements under the provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 consider the same and pass a reasoned order strictly in accordance '*'ith law and communicate a copy of the said order to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible'
Operative part
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this Writ Petition, shall staqd c!o,1ed. SD/-A.V.S.PRASAD DEPUW REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// Hvderabad. State of Telang?oa 'l . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department' Secretariat Buildings' - . . . 2 The District Collector, Janqaon utstrtcl :. iii; "R";;;; D*i;i";;ibYfffii,-c-nanpurlsration)Division,,Jansaon District i. i'd" rir1Jiro* ium .loint 5uo-iiiEit'ai:' cirilpur Revenue Mandal' Jansaon s. 5il c'c to sRl ASHoK REDDY KANAT-HALA' Advocate tol-u9l 6' i;; dddi" cp ron REV-ENUE: Hish Court for the State of relansana' at District Hvderabad. [OUTI Two CD CoPies To 7 PSK, GJP HIGH COURT DATED:1311112025 ORDER WP.No.34485 of 2025 ------E--= I a ,--=: r rU :;I4 r4i (o\1 (J 2xnfiE (n ( 2 6 I o6SpAICIT L r.O DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of There shall
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Land and Pattadar Passbook Act, 1971; Land Act, 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.