The High Court · 2025

1 . The State of Telangana, rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court' Hyderabad. - Fioriro.ras, iasn, su*e'v.1rto-os,oo. wtc( Btock'tr4edchal-Malkaiiri DisJr_rc! 2.lndupatiSailaja.D/o.lndupatiLaxmaiah,Age-:5Qyrs,Occ:Housewife'R/o' permanenr nadress: H -t',to:t -7 -658t 1 /a/ 1, Shastri Nagar, Ramnagar' WC IVlusheerabad, HYderabad ...ResPondents PetitionunderSection528ofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the tVlemorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may o.pr""seatoquashtheproceedingsinF.l.R.No.1131of2024dated.30-9.2024 or (pHe Colony police Station, Cyberabad so far as the petitioners/ Accused. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: lndupati Sailaja, D/o Plot.No.'185, 185/A, lndupati Laxmaiah. Age. 56 yrs, Occ: House wife. R/o' SuiGv.f.fo of ,o6, MCK- Block' Medchal-Malkajiri District' l, Permanent Addres;s H.No. i -7-658/ 1 Musheerabad, Hyderabad /a/ 1, Shastri Nagar, Ramnagar, VTC AND ...Petitioner/Respondent No.2

1. S.Gopi, S/o S.R;amchandar Rao, Aged about 46 yrs, Occ: Busiress, 2. S.Shruthi, Wo.Sr e6p;. Age: 40 years, Occ: House wife Both are Rlo. 6-l2l1l , Vivekanandanagar Colony, Kukatpally. 3. S.Ramachadra Rao, S/o. S.Shivaiah, Age: 68 years, Occ: Business All are Permanent Residence of: #.I:;J U, Chinnagortimukkta Shivampet (m). Chinnagottirrukkta Medak

4. The State of Hyderabad. ...Petitioner/Accused No.1,2 & 3 -elangana, rep., by its public prosecutor, High Court, Petition under Section ... RespondenURes pondent No..l -35g(6) of BNSS praying that in the c;ircumstances stated in the Memoranaum of Grounds of criminai petition, the High court may be pleased to accord permissron to compouni on"n"" between the petitioner / Respondent No.2 and Respondents No.1,) and 3 / petitioners / Acct.,sed. No..1 ,2 & 3 in originar in F r R No 1 13'1 0f 2024 oatea. go-os-z ozr ot xpine .tro"v pori* Station, Cyberabad. l.A. NO:3 oF 2024 Petition under section of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminai petition, the High court may be pleased to record tne^compromi." to the offence between the Petitioner Respondent No 2 and Respondenis rrrl. i,z a 3 i petitioners / Accused No.'1 ,2 & 3 in origrnar in F.r.R.No. 1131 0t20ii dated 30_09_2oZa orxena c-orony Police Station, Cyberabad "orJornd -35g(2) This Petition com ing on for hearing, upon perusing the lVlenrorandum of Grounds of criminar petirion and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J. Marikarjun, Advocate for the pelitroners and the pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri K. Bhaskar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER -*- .".*7 I t \-*sff}**a-: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.15552 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 52g of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 3 to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No. I l3I of 2024 of KpHB Colony Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3(t)(r)(s) SC/ST pOA Acr, 2015, Sections 3 I 8(4), 3 I 6(2), 329(4), 324(4), 3 5 I (2) of BNS.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and3 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 27.12.2024, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court t ( for the State: ,tf Telangana, IJyderabad, for identificatilrn and to I \ submit a repc rt.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a repoft, dated 03.01.2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. In vieu of the above, LA.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allorved and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 3 in Crime No. l1:l I of 2024 of KPHB Colony police Station, Cyberabad, arr: hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPYII Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR i) S ON OFFICER

1. The lV Addition;rl Junior Civil Magistrate, Kukatpally, Cyberabad Judge cum XV Additional l\iletropolitan

2. The Station House Officer, KpHB Colony, Cyberabad District. 3. Two ccs to the Pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of ferangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri J tr/ailikarjun, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri K. Bhaskar, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Along with a Copy of Joint /emo of Compromise) h w JOINT MEMO FILED BY BOTH THE PARTIES I It is submitted that on the basis ot. the complaint given by the 2nd Respondent / Defacto-complainant, the police KpHB colony register a case in F.|.R.No.1131/2024 dt.30.O9.2024 for the offende U/s. 3(1)(r)(s) SC ST pOA . ACT 2015'318(4)'316(2),329(4),324(4),3s1(2) BNS, against the petitioners / Accused.no.1,2 &3 herein after that police submitted the same before the Hon,ble lvAJCJ, cum XVAddl. Mekopolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, cyberabad and the same is pending, The petitioner herein filed the above quash petition seeking to quash the proceedings in the said case at the intervention of elders of both sides, the petitioners herein and the 2nd Respondent / Defacto-complainant came to an understanding with an outcome of compromise, as such both are intending to compromise the matter and the Defacto-complainant is intending to withdraw the above said case i.e. F.l.R.no g4ot2o23 d1.26.10.2023 for the offense U/s. 468, 471, 420 of l.p.c, This joint memo have been entered and executed with the will and wish of the Petitioners and the 2nd Respondent herein. Hence this joint memo. Place : Hyderabad Date: - -2024 .z E--e-------t- Z.- g-r Petitioner / Accused. no.1, g. sboitu^ petitioner / Accused.no.2, s Petitione .no.3 t 2 Defacto Complainant counset ro,. tn" p"titioffi#"" d.No.1,2 & 3 btJ- Counsel for the 2nd Respondent / Defacto-Complainant t-" 0 IN THE HIGH COTIRT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF'TELANGANA AT:: HYDERABAD. t.A.No. '\ r-tN cRL'P'No' l-fStd'o'o of 2024 Between: 1. S.Copi, S/o.S.Rarchandar Rao, Aged about 46 yrs, Occ: Business, ''o{-

2. S.Shruthi, W /o. S.Gopi, Age: 40 years, Occ: House wife Both are Rlo. 6-12 / 1 1, Vivekanandanagar Colony, Kukatpally.,

3. S.Ramachadra Rao, S/o. S.Shivaiah Age:68 years, Occ: Busines AII are Permanente Residence of : H.No. 1 -83, Chinnagottimukkla, Shivampet (m), Chinnagottimukkla,, Medak Dist., ...Petitioners / Accused.No.1, 2 & 3 AND 1 The State of Telangala rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyclerabad.

2. Indupati Sailaja, D/o. Indupati Laxmaiah, Aged about 56 yrs, Or:c: House wife, R/o. Plot.No. 185, 185/A, Survey.No.63,66, MCK Block Medchal-Malkaj iri Dist., Permanente Address : H.No.l -7-65 S / 1 I a I 1, Shastri Nagar, Rarnnagar, VTC Musheerabad, Hyderabad .. Respondents ?**3t HIGH COURT DATED:0910112025 t q ) c o i.{E s TA r€ 1 3 0 JA[i 2[25 I OE.sPATr\i o ! * COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 o12024 in/and CRLP.No.15552 ot 2024 BOTH l.As AND CRIMINAL PETITION ARE ALLOWED r(c/rP\