High Court · 2025

33. Gobbur Akhil, S/o.G.Srinivasulu, Aged about. 22 Yts, Occ. un-emplyee Qualification.lntermediate, R/o. H.No.1 -5-1 0 Raatiburju, Gadwal mandal and rural, Mahabub Nagar District.

34. Kailuri.satyn anyana, S/o.K.Narsappa, Aged about. 32 Yrs, Occ un-emplyee Qualificati6n. lniermediate, Rl/o. H.No.1-184/25, New Maruti nagar, Makthal' Mahabub Nagar District.

35. B.Yuqendhar, S/o. B.Bheemanna Aged about'42 Yrs, Occ uremplyee QualiYication. Degree, Ryo. Revulapalli (po) Chintarevula, priyadarshini jurala project,Dharur, Mahabub Nagar District.

36. A.VijayarajKumar, S/o.A.Yesaiah Aged a-bout- 25- Yrs, Occ. Quaiificati6n. lntermediate, Rl/o. H.No.1-10-58, LIG-190' Board,Gadwal l/andal and village Mahabub Nagar District. un-emplyee Housing ...PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, lrrigation & CAD Department. Secretaiiat Buildings, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Jogulamba Gadwal District, Gadwal. 2 3. The Chief Engineer (Projects), Nettempadu Project' KLI Camp, Jogulamba Gadwal Distnct.

4. The Supenntendrng Engineer. PJP Circle No.l, KLI Camp, Jogulamba Gadeal District. Gadwal, Telangana State. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Artrcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a wnt. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lvlandamus declaring the in action on the part of the Respondent No.3 in not considering the representatton dated 05.06.2017 of the Petitioners as work lnspectors in PJP Execution, tr/ajor lrrigation Project, Gadwal of Jogulamba Gadwal drstrict as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles-19 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and issue a consequential direction directing the Respondent No 3 to consider the representation of the Petitioners dated 05.06.2017 IAN : 1 0F 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 05.06.2017 for the post of Work lnspectors with respect to PJP Execution, Major lrrigation Project, Gadwal of Jogulamba Gadwat district. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI AZIZ HUSSAIN, REP. FOR SRt J.PRABHAKAR Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES-t The Court made the following: ORDER i t THE HON'BLE SRI JuSTICE PULLA I{ARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.33O1O OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief '...to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in-action on the part of the Respondent No.3 in not considenng the representation dat€d 05.06.2017 of the Petitioners as Work lnspectors in PJP Execution, Major lrrigation Project, Czrdwal of Jogulamba Gadwal district as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles l9 and 21 of the Constitution of India and rssue a consequential direction directing the Respondent No.3 to consider the representation of t]le petitioners dated 05.06.2017 and pass. ."

2. Heard Sri Aziz Hussain, learned counsel representing Sri J.Prabhakar, learncd counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader lor Services I for the respondents.

3. Learned counscl lirr the petitioners submits that the petitioners lost thcir lands in Nettempadu project and the State Government has takcn a policv decision in G.O.Ms.No.98, dated

15.04. 1986, to providc crnplovmcnt to the displaced persons or their dependants. Therelorc, the petitioners are eligible for employment under displirt:ed persons quota. Hence, learned t \ counsel prays thrs Court ro permit the petitioners to make representation/ s bc[ore thc respondents seeking redressal of grievance and that thc respondents m:ry be directed to consider the I 2 szrme and pass and pass necessary orders t hcreon, within a stipulated period of time.

4. l,earned Government pleader for the respondents fairly submits that on receipt of representation/ s frorr t]re petitioners, the respondents will consider the same and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.

5. Having regard to the submissions madc by the learned counsel for the respective parties, without going into merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make their representation/ s before thc responclcnts fcrr redressal of their grievarrce, within a period of tu,o (2) u ccks frorn the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt o[ such rc prescntation/ s, the respondents are directed to considcr Lhe same and pass appropriate orders thereon, strictly in accorclarrce u,ith law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably rvirhin :r perx.cl of six (6) weeks thereof and communicate a copy thereof to tlrc pcritioncrs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall srirncls closcd. There shall be no order as to costs. To, //TRUE COPY/i \ssr \\ SD/.V.KAVITHA NT REGISTRAR / sEcTroN oFFtcER The Principal Secretary, lrrigation & Buildings, Hyderabad, State of Telangana CADl' Decartment, Secretariat

2. The District Collector, Jogulamba Gadwal Drstrict. Gadwal. 3 The. Chief Engineer (Projects), Nettempadu Proiect. (Ll Camp, Jogulamba Gadwal District 4 The. Superintending Engineer, PJP Circte No I KLI Camp, Jogulamba Gadeal District, Gadwal, Telangana State

5. One CC to SRI J.PRABHAKAR, Advocate [OPUC]

6. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-|, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies BSR GJP \ t , t I ! ! ! I T 5 1 I I HIGH COURT DATED:1710212025 ) ORDER WP.No.33010 of 2018 f { -:-_-1-=f_- Tl-lE sri ,6 R( 10 lutt zE (f t' o o o t t ?t'*.,, \ ., a:,-i, DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS