Gollapudi Ramanianevr rlu v. Gollapudi Shiva parvathr
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as r.r,ell as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 have been ljled to record the compromise…
- Para 55. In view of the above, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos. I to 3 in C.C.No.399 of 2023 on the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Xll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate…
Judgment
...Respondent / De-facto Comptainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in cc No'399 0't 2023, dt.27 01 -2023 0n the fire of , AJCJ cum Honourabre X, Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally, registered Under Sec.49B-A, 406 of tpC 3,4 of DpA i 7 l.A.NOs.2 and 3 of 2O24 Between !{nt^Sai Priya, Wo Ramanjaneyulu, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Household R/o.Plot No.40, Near Srinivasa hagar, Eala Krishna fuagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad N/o.Gopalapuram, Haiumakonaa Hanumjionda Disiict.'' ..Petitioner / Respondent No.2 AND 1 Gollapudi_Ramanjaneyuru. s/o.Koteshwar Rao. Aqed about 30 vears. occ F/,vate. Emptoyee. R/o.Flat No.501, Balakrishna Nagar, ' Hyderabad. Kukatpaliy. 2 9ollapudi Shiva Parvathi, Wo.Koteshwar Rao, Aged about 30 years, Occ . House Wife. R/o FIat No.501, Balakrishna Nagar, K"ukatpitti, iyO6irOii. -' 3. Gollapudi SKV Subramanylln, S/o.Koteshwar Rao, Aged about 23 years, Occ -' -"- . Student, R/o.Ftat No.501', Batakrishna Nagar, Kukatp"affy. UvJeiaUla. AII are native of H.No.177-1614, Beside Government High schoor ward-1, NTR Nagar, Chimakurthy prakasham District. ...Petitioners / Accused No.,l,2 & 3 4. The state of relangana, rep.by rts pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabaci. ...Respondent / Respondent No.1 l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 3b9(2), R/w. section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be preased to permit the petitioner to compound the offences Under Sec.498-A, 406 of rpc 3,4 of DpA in cc No. 399 of 2023 on the fire of the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Kalwakurthy. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromise and consequenfly quashing the agarnst the petitioner in CC No.399 of 2023, dt27.O1 .2023 in F.t R.No.282 of 2020 Women Police station, saroornagar, Hyderabad on the file of ll AJCJ cum Honourable Xll Addl. Metropolitan [\4agistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally. l.A. NO: 1OF 2024 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in CC No.399 of 2023, d1.27.01 .2023 on the file of ll AJCJ cum Honourable Xll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally, registered Under Sec.49B_A,406 of lpC 3,4 of DPA pending disposal of the above criminal petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B. Sathish, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional pubtic prosecutor (TG/Ap) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of sri M. sekhar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following Common Order:- t HON'BLE SMT. .IT]STICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 in/and C'RIMINAL PETITION No.15603 of 2 024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 3 to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.399 of 2023 on the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Xll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally, registered for the offbnces punishable under Section 498A, 406 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
#2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as r.r,ell as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 have been ljled to record the compromise between them and to compound the offence. t'
#3. Vide order dated 24.12.2024, this Court directed the parlies along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Courl Legal Services Committee, High Court 2 .t' for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.
#4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Couft Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 02.01 .2025 and the same is placed on record.
#5. In view of the above, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos. I to 3 in C.C.No.399 of 2023 on the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Xll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. \ To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR S TION OFFICER
#1. The ll Additional Junior Civil Judge cum Xll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally-
#2. The Station House Officer, Kukatpally P S., Cyberabad.
#3. TwoCCstothePublicProsecutor, HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT]
#4. One CC to Sri B. Sathish, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri M. Sekhar, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD CoPies w HIGH COURT DATED:0710112025 COMMON ORDER l.A.NOs. 2 AND 3 OF 2024 IN/AND CRLP.No.15603 ot 2024 I HE $'r4 14: ...l .J o 10 iit fis t * ,n Sf-,1r L,\'\ ALLOWING THE I.A.NOS.2 AND 3 OF 2024 IN/AND cRP NO.15603 0F 2024
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 406, 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — ss. 3, 4.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 07 Jan 2025. The bench was ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.