✦ High Court of India · 13 Nov 2025

Recently, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ro iendra Kumqr Barjatga v. U.P. Aud.s E

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,249 words

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution'of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 6 in not receiving the application form and release the individual seryice connection to the petitioner, H. No.2-5612/1024 on Plot No.1024, in Survey No.32, admeasuring 300 Sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North- Plot No.1023 South- Plot No.1025 East- 30 Feet Wide Road West. Plot No.1028., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive application and to release th€, connection without being influenced by the instructions of the 7t r respondent. individual service lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circu nstances stated in pleased to direct the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may L the Respondents 2 to 6 to receive the application and rele lse the individual service connection to the petitioner, H. No.2-56l2/1024 on Plot 1l|o.1024, in survey No.32, admeasuring 300 Sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), S erilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North- Plot No.1023; Sr uth- Plot No.1025: East- 30' Feet Wide Road, West- Plot No.1 028. = Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 6: SRI N.SREEDHAR It :DDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN R: )DY, SC FOR The Court made the following: ORDER GHMC THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No 3 0F 2025 ORDER: Petitioners seeking a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 6 in not receiving their application for electricity connections to their property bearing H.No.2-56/21 1024, plot No.lO24, admeasuring 300 square yards in survey No.32, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Heard Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learncd Government Plcader for Energz on behalf of Respondcnt No. 1, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 to 6 and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, Iearned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.7 - Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.

3. Learned counsel for' the petitioners submits that in somewhat similar circumstances, white dealing with Writ petition No. 20121 of 2025, this Court by order dated 14.02.2025 directed the respondents authorities therein to release the service connection, , subject to the compliance of the statutory requirements by the petitioner therein, and hence, requested this Court to pass similar order in the present Writ petition also. 2

4. Recently, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ro iendra Kumqr Barjatga v. U.P. Aud.s E{am Vikas Parishad I , in the larger public interest, issued directions in addition t: thc directives issued in Re: Directions in the matter of demolitt: t of stntctures. Reievant for the purpose of this case are: "(iv) All the necessary service connections, ruch as, Electricity, water supply, sewerage connecli )n, ctc., shalt be given by the service provider / Boer I to the buildings only afler the production of the co. aplction / occupation certilicate. (v) Even after issuancc ol completion c: 't ifi<:ate, deviation / violation if any contrary to the I lanning permission brought Lo the notice of the a r thorify immediate steps be takcn by the said a : thori[z concerned, in accordance with [aw, agei 1st the builder / owner / occupant; and the officral who is responsible for issuance of wrongful com r ction / occupation certilicate shall be pr rcecded departmentally [orthwith. (vi) No permission / licence to conduct any b,,r;iness / trade must be given by any authoritics inclu<l ng local bodies of States / Union Territories n any unauthorised building irrespective of 1 being residential or commercial building. (vii) The development must be in conformitl, /ith the zonal plarr land usage. Any modiiication to slr, h zctnal 7l7an and usage must be taken by strictly f rllowing | 2024 SCC Online SC 3767 3 the rules in place land in consideration of the larger public interest and the impact. on the environment".

5. Since the prayer of the petitioners is to receive the application form and release individual service connection, this Court without going into merits of the matter, directs the respondents to process the application of the petitioners and release individual service connection to the subject property, subject to the petitioners complying with the directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in RaJendra Kumqr Barjatga,s case (supra) and the statutory requirements prescribed by the local authorities.

6. The Writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. I /ITRUE COPY// SD/- K.MADHAVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER District. To I The PrinciDal Secretary Power and Energy Department Secretariat' Reddv District. '' HvOeraOaO, State of T6lang ana -500022' , it; ifi;ffi *i]rr-rvrri.,slng oirector' -telangana State Southern Power Distribution comprny fi,iit"o", Viov'ln so19h5' Somaiiouda Hvderabad' 3. The Superintenoins e;gheli, i#;d'il St'G soutnbin Power Distribution " il;;;[;'ii."'lt"J, Viovitn soudha, Somajiguda' Hvderabad +. ii'lj'5ili'di,ii"r'E"br;Jjr"op'*fi'on' (ono-dpli' i o s p oc L' Ranga Reddv S. ir,t'iii.t. Divisional Engineer, operation Kondapur' TGSPDC L' Ranga 6. il;K;ldni'Engineer, SE/oPiGHYD East AE oP Atlapur' T G S P DC L' ?. i'fr" "C#;['. i5n-" i. G,""t" t Hyd e rabad M un ici pa I Corporation' 8. 6;;'i6i;-sMt rHArUn"nooPA s lNG H, Advocate [oPU-c] 6. i;; dcri" cp ron Er.rricv, High court for the state of Telangana, at -s-q I q B I9 s P D c I. Iq i U 9L - r o. ij'n!'c6 iJ s k r r.r. S n e r o un R R E ii.5;; dc i; SFii e.runonu5uoHAN REDDY, sc FoR GHMC [oPUC] 12.Two CD CoPies Ranoa ReddY District. Serillnqampally Zone. Ranga Keooy ulslrlcl' Hvderabad. [OUT] q D-Yr W PSK. ': --: : z'?Li; . ). ll r-':'.'r - . '--i:- - :-r-.- - : j:1 ..' j- ar...l.,. -/r ..i ''.. .,., i 1 Q ;;; 1., i ,-: ;:. ii !-_ \,i -",l ',. ir.' HIGH COURT DATED:1311112025 ORDER WP.No.34433 of 2025 Z' //,'< .., / '\\ il :) ._\, -<- ,.;.12, DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS u/

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments