Sri Boini Narsimhulu v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order/ s more paiticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, a. declaring the action oi tfre Respondents in not considering/processing and disposing the TM33 online application No. 2400077857 submitted by the petiti-oner through Dharani portal on 08.08.2024 for correction of I I I I my Land Nature from 'Laoni Pada' to 'Patty' in respect of the land to an extent Ac. 6-00 gts in Sy. No. 62121 situated at Rangampally village of Pargi Mandal, Vikarabad District, as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and violative of Article 300-4 of the constitution of lndia, and b. consequentially direct the Respondents to restore the patty to the land to an extent Ac. 6-00 gts in Sy. No. 62t21 situated at Rangampally village of Pargi Mandal, Vikarabad District of the Petitioners by changing the nature of lands from laoni patty to patty. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. DORNALA SAI MAHITHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ASSTGNMENT The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.35213 of 2O24 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226.of the Constitution of India, is frled seeking the following relief: "....to issue a wit or order/ s more parliqiarlg one in the nature of Wit of Mandamus a) declaing tlle qction of the respondents tn twt con-stdeing/ processing and dtsposing tle TM33 onltne appltcatton No.2400077857 submitted bA the petittoner through Dharani portal on 08.08.2O24 for a)nection of mA land Noture from lnoni Patta to Palta tn resPecl of the land to aft ertent AC.6-OO gts in Sg.No.62/21 situqted at Rangampallg uttlage of Pargi Manda\ Vikarabad Distict os illegal, unjust, orbitrary and uiolatiue of Article 300A of tle constitution of India and b) an-sequentialtg dtrect the respondents to restore the pattA to the tand to an ertent Ac.6-0O gts in SA.No.62/21 situated at Rangampally uillage of Pargi Mandol, Vikqrabad Distict of the Petitionerc bg changing the nature of lands from laoni pattq to patta. . . . '

2. Considered the submissions of lhe learned counsel ior the parties and perused the record.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that originally, his father-Boini Anthaiah ald his paternal uncle-Lalaiah, were the joint owners and possessors of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.l2-Oogts in Sy.No.62 (Paiki) situated at Rangampaliy village, Pargi Mandal, Vikarabad District. It is further case of the petitioner that after the demise of his fathbr, he succeeded the share of his father i.e, land to an extent of Ac.6-OO gts vide Proceedings No.B/6O83/2OO 1 dated I I )

22.t2.2OO7 issued by the respondent No.6, wherein the land was classified as 'patta land'. It is also case of tJle petitioner that he was also issued e-pattadar Passbooks under the provisions of Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act,2O2O (for short "ROR Act, 2020") but the nature of land was wrongly shown as 'Laoni Patta (Assigned Land)' instead of 'Patta . It is further case of the petitioner thzrt seeking correction of nature of land from 'Laoni Patta' to 'Patta' in respect of land to an extent Ac. 6-00 gts in Sy.No.62/21 situated at Rangaapally village, he sutrmitted online application dated Oa.O8.2O24 through Dharani portai vide Application No. 24OO077857 under TM-33 module. The grievance of the petitioner is that l(trasra Pahani for the year 1954-55 in respect of tJle subject land reflects as 'patta land'and even after receipt of the online application dated 08.08.2024, till date, the respondents have not taken any action. Hence the writ petition.

4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents has not disputed th.rt in Khasra Pahani for the year 1954-55 standing in the name of petitioner's predecessor-in-interest, the nature of land is shown as patta lald.

5. In view of the above, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents to examine the petitioner's online Application No.24OOO77857 dated 3 O8.OA.2O24, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Telangala Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 2O20 or the Teiangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025, as the case may be. The respondent-authorities shall duly veriS' the revenue records including the Khasra Pahali and, if it is found that the nature of the land is 'Patta lald', necessar5r corrections shall be made in the revenue records and amended pattadar passbooks shall be issued to the petitioner, in accordance with law. If, however, the petitioner is found ineligible or if the claim is not substantiated, the respondents shall pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioner. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/-K.AMMAJ! EPUTY REGISTRAR ,/ .z SECTION OFFICER Dr. BR Ambedkar //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The, Rep b Secretariat, yPrincipal Secretary, Rever srate of retangrn, ,Hvo"rjHSo?epartment,

2. The Chief Commissione ann,p,mJioi;i j jffi :[Jr.?;,,9,"iH']1,'f Jfi 3:llf 5ggx.,",",o0,

3. The District Collector, VikarabadDistrict. 4. The Additional Collector (Revenue), Vikarabad District. H

5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad Division, Vikarabad District. 6. The Tahsildar and Joint Sub-Regiskar, PargiMandal, Vikarabad District 7. One CC to SRl. DORNALA SAt MAHTTHA Advocate tOpUCl 8. Two CCs to GP FOR ASSIGNMENT ,High Court for the State of Telangana. touTl

9. TWO CD COPIES IO.ONE SPARE COPY GSA/tsSKr'a / HIGH COURI- I DATED:2010it12025 t \ ORDER WP.No.3521:3 of 2024 oR 1rra )- 1.4 I5 I ( o (J 2 o lutl zUE o8..;p ATC H fro 2: j' / DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT CICSTS /4 /z