Se.elam .Chaithra. Shree v. Managing Director

9.eelam. _Manasa, W/o Late Seelam Srinivas Reddy Aged 3g years, Occ. House Wife Rt/o Qr.No. 101 Btock No.B, pothana Cbtoiy, pencfrit<jfd peti, Post Mareddupaka, Ramagundam Mandal peddapalli oistrict. presenttv rii Soorampeta of Shayampeta Mandal of hanumakonda district. Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more one in the nature of wRlr oF ...RESPONDENTS MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 1 o 5 in receiving the application/representatio n of the 6th respondent for payrr:nt of terminal death benefits of Seelam Srinivas Reddy who is the father of I e petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of Principles c t natural Justice and t r entertain any consequently direct the application/representation of the 6th respondent for terminal Ceath benefits , job of compassionate apporntment of the petitioner father Seel: n Srinivas Reddy by directing the respondents to keep one post vacant to the pe itioner until her attain respondents not age of majority lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r;i cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Co rrt may be pleased to direct the respondents not to entertain any application/rep esentation of the 6th respondent for terminal death benefits, job of compassion a e appointment of the petitioner father Seelam Srinivas Reddy by directing the re s rondents to keep one post vacant to the petitioner until her attain age of majority Ir rnding disposal of the above Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAMESH GORRE Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: SRI C. RAMAN Kt MAR REDDY, SC FOR SINGARNI COLIERIS CO LTD Counsel for the Respondent No. 6 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER a THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHTK WRIT PETITION No.3444a of 2025 ORDER: Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in entertaining the application/representation of respondent No.6, for payment of terminal- cum-death benefrts of the petitioner's father, the present writ petition is hled.

2. Heard Sri Gorre Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri C. Raman Kumar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Singareni Collieries Company Limited, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 5. With their consent, the writ petition is taken r.rp for disposal at admission stage.

3. Learned counsel for the petiLioner submits that the petitioner is the daughter of the deceased employee of respondent Company, I I Mr. S. Srinivas Reddy, who passed away on 1O.O4.2024 while in service as a Hauler operator. Therefore, the petitioner submitted her representation to respondent No.3 on 1O.O5.2024, ventilating and seeking redressal of her grievance. However, no action has been taken thereon so far. Therefore, learned counsel seeks indulgence of this Court to direct respondent No.3 to consider the said representation, and pass necessary orders within the time-frame as may be stipulated by this Court. I I 2 PK, J W.P.No.34448 of 2O25

4. Learned Stalding Counsel appearing on behalf c I the respondents fairly submits that respondent No.3 will consider the rr'1 resentation of the petitioner dated 10.05.2O24, and pass appropriate orl:rs in accordance with law.

5. Having regard to the submissions made by lear:r :d counsel for the respective parties, without going into merits of the case he Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to pass appropr ate orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 10.05.2024, du.' providing her an opportunity of personal hearing and also by putting all 1 -re affected parties on notice, strictly in accordance with law, as expedi: ru slv as possible, preferably within a period of eight (08) weeks from the , .ate of receipt of a copy of this order, and communicate a copy thereof to t r : petitioner. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in thi; wril petition, shall stand closed. No costs. //TRUE COPY// ;D/. L.VIJAYA LAXMI ASSiI ;TANT REGISTRAR I SECTION OFFICER . L,; To, '1 . The Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collir: es Company Limited., Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Beside Niloufer lo,spital, Masabtank, Hyderabad. :

2. The Director (Personnel and Adminisration), Head Ofli, e, Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Kothagudem Collieries, Bhadradri Kothe 3udem Dist.

3. The General Manager, Adryala Project Area (APli Mine, the Slngareni Collieries Company-Limited,' Ramagumdam-lll Cent: rary colony, Ramagiri Mandal Peddapalli District

4. The Mine Manager, Adryala Project Area (APA) Mine 1e Srngareni Collieries Company Limit6d, Ramagumd-am-lll Centenary co < ny, Ramagiri Mandal Peddapalli District S. Ing. project Manager. Adryala Project Area (ApA) Mine, the Singareni Collieries 9gmpq.ll t-!ry,ited, Ramagumdam-il1 Cent6nary cotony, Rairagiri Mandal Peddapalli District I I

6. One CC to SRI RAMESH GORRE, Advocate tOpUCI 7. One CC to SRl. C RAMAN KUMAR REDDY, SC FOR S|NGARN| COLIER|S CO LTD, Advocate [OPUC] B. Two CD Copies PVL GJP w a HIGH COURT DATED:1 811112025 I 0 ORDER WP.No.34448 of 2025 I ITHE S Te , r- * I / JAN 2!i6 'z 'l: ] gp'r.--. -' , . .-, ; '' \:.:- ::- --- I / a DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \ . _. -lf .::i'lLi._:-, -'- :' ;':{iii 4i}$i::.'::r i.. '