✦ High Court of India · 15 Oct 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Oct 2025

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI M.ARUN KUI tAR. SC FOR GHMC WRIT PETITION NO: 34898 OF 2014 Between: Y'l"V..Xfqlt Aganival S/o. Late Kishanlal Agaruur, aqed about 49 years, R/o. 1 1-6430, Nampally X Roads Hyderabad - SOOC f t AND 1 2 H.yde.rab.ad Municipal Corporation, Rep. tl its Commissioner Tank ^Grealqr. Bund, Hyderabad. Asst. ,City.Planner, .Town Planning Section, Circle l o.g, Central Zone, Abids complex Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of rdia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, tre High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other a r rropriate writ, order or orders, Direction or Directions to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner rf the property bearing No.5-7-586 to 588 situated at Nampally X Roads, Hy I _,rabad, in any manner, except by following due process of law and not to dispc,l sess the petitioner from the said land except by acquiring the same and by laying compensation in accordance with rhe Right to Fair compensation anc Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resetflement Act, 2013 l.A. NO: I OF 2014(WPM P. NO: 43663 OF 20141 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, its officers, subordinates not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner of the property bearing No. 5-7-5g6 to 588 situated at Nampally X Roads, Hyderabad, in any manner, except by following due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M.ARUN KUMAR, SC FOR GHMC WRIT PETITION NO: 34922OF 2014 Between: !.alithraj, S/o. Hyderabad - 500001. -Sumirmal Aged about 62 years, R/o. 116-473, Namapally, AND 1 Grealer Hyderabad Munrcipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 Asst. City Planner, Town Planning Section Circle No.B, Central Zone, Abids complex, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner of the property bearing Nos.5-7-592 and 5-7-593 situated at Nampally X Roads, Hyderabad, in any manner, except by following due process of law and not to dispossess the petitioner from the said land except by acquiring the same and by paying compensation in accordance with The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitatron and Resettlement Act, 2013_ l.A. NO: 1OF 2O14(WP MP. NO:4369 1 0F 20141 Petition under section 1sl cpc praying that in t re circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High (;ourt may be pleased to direct the respondents, its officers, subordinates not to r terfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner of the propt rty bearing Nos.5-7-592 and 5-7-593 situated at Nampally X Roads, HyderabaJ in any manner, except by following due process of law, pending disposal of the vrit petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M.ARUN KUMAR, SC FOR GHMC WRIT PETITION NO: 34945 0F 2014 Between: Suresh._Kumar, S/o. Late .Ga.neshmal, Aged abor 49 years, R/o.5_7_589, Nampally X Roads, Hyderabad - 5O0OOi AND ,| Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. t,r its Commissioner Tank Bund, Hyd'erabad. z Asst. .city.Planner, .Town Pranning section circre i,r r B, centrar Zone, Abids complex Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER .,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lrdia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, t re High court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other aJ) rropriate Writ, Order or orders, Direction or Directions to direct the respondent:i not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner , f the property bearing No.5-7-589 situated at Nampally X Roads, Hyderabad, rr any manner, except by following due process of law and not to dispossess the. letitioner from the said land except by acquiring the same and by paying comr lnsation in accordance with rhe Right to Fair compensation and rranspare.:y in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resetflement Act, 2013. t.A. NO: 1 0F 201 P.NO: 43716 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, its officers, subordinates not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner of the property bearing No.S-7-5g9 situated at Nampally X Roads, Hyderabad, in any manner, except by following due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M.ARUN KUMAR, SC FOR GHMC WRIT PETITION NO: 34957 OF 2014 Between: !.raveenchqnd, S/o. Sumirmal Aged about 52 years, No.3$-27,2nd floor, Flat No.202 Heera Towers, Himayathnagar Hydeiabad - 5OOO29. AND 1 2 Greater Bund, H Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep- by its Commissioner, Tank yderabad. Asst. City complex H Planner, Town Planning Section Circle No.B, Central Zone, Abids yderabad. ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner of the property bearing No.5-7-590 situated at Nampally X Roads, Hyderabad, in any manner, except by following due process of law and not to dispossess the petitioner from the said land except by acquiring the same and by paying compensation in accordance with The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO:43729 0F 20141 Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in t re circumstances stated in the affadavit fited in support of the petition, the High (;ourt may be pleased to direct the respondents, its officers, subordinates not to rr terfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner of the prop t rty bearing Nos.5-7-590 situated at Nampally X Roads, Hyderabad, in any mar rer, except by foilowing due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent: SRI M.ARUN KUMAR, SC :OR GHMC WRIT PETITION NO: 34958 0F 2014 Between: Vimalchand, S/o. Sumermal, Aged about 57 year; R/o. 8_302, 2nd floor, Nandanam Apartments Fateh Su-itan Lane, Nam'apar y, Hydeiabad'- SO-OOO1- ' AND 1 2 GreaIe.r. Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. tr, its Commissioner Tank Bund, Hyderabad. Asst. complex, Hyderabad. .City. Planner, Town Planning Section Circle \ t.g, Central Zone, Abids ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of rrdia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith t re High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other ap rropriate writ, order or otders, Direction or Directions to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner )f the property bearing No.5-7-594 situated at Nampally X Roads, Hyderabad I any manner, except by following due process of law and not to dispossess tho petitioner from the said bred except by acquiring the same and by paying conl ensation in accordance milk rhe Right to Fair compensation and rransparer:y in Land Acquisition, Ration and Resettlement Act, 20.13. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO:43730 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, its officers, subordinates not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner of the property bearing No.5-7-594 situated at Nampally X Roads, Hyderabad, in any manner, except by following due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent: SRI M.ARUN KUMAR, SC FOR GHMC WRIT PETITION NO: 35178 OF 2014 Between:

1. Ahmed Mohiuddin, S/o.late Khaja Moinuddin Aged about 68 years, R/o. Flat No.201 3 Floor, H.No.10.2.3O0, Bazaarghat Hyderabad.

2. Mohd. Salahuddin, S/o.late Khaja Moinuddin Aged about 61 years, Occ Business R:/o.H.No.5-7-1 '1 7, Nampally, Hyderabad.

3. Shahnaaz Sultan, Wo.Mohd. Safiuddin Aged about 64 years, Occ Household R/o.5-7-290, Aghapura, Hyderabad. AND 1 Greater Bund, H Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner Tank yderabad. 2 Asst. City complex H Planner, Town Planning Section, Circle No.8, Central Zone, Abids yderabad. ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners of the property bearing No.5-7-576 to 579 and 5-7-580 to 583 situated at Nampally Road, Hyderabad, in any manner, except by following due process of law and not to dispossess the petitioners from the said land except by acquiring the same and by paying compensation in accordance with The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. No; 43995 0F 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in tn : circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High (l )urt may be pleased to direct the respondents, its officers, subordinates not to irrl -'rfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the pr operty bearing No.5-7- 576 to 579 and 5-7-580 to 583 situated at Nampally Fl, ad, Hyderabad, in any manner, except by following due process of law, penrl rg disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI ASHFAQ AHMED Counsel for the Respondent: SRI M.ARUN KUMAR, SC I OR GHMC The Court made the following: COMMON ORDE: t HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALTSHETTY WRITPETITION Nos.34896 34898 34922 34945 34957 34958 and 35178 of20l4 OR.DER: The prayer sought for in all the Writ Petitions is one and the same, i.e., to issue aWit of Mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over their respective properties situated at Nampa y Cross Roads, Hyderabad, in any manner, except by following due process o[ [aw, and further, not to dispossess .the petitioners lrom their respective properties excep[ by acquiring the samc and by paying compensation as per the fught to Fair Compensation and Transparenc;r in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement, Act.

2. Since the issue involved in all these Writ petitions is common, all the Writ Petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by common order.

3. Heard Sri Veduta Srinivas, leamed senior counsel appearing for petitioners, and Sri M.Arun Kumar, leamed Standing Counsel for respondents-GHMC. . LNA. J WP.N?.Jt896 of 2dt 1 4. Leamed senior counsel appearing I rr aid bakh the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the owner j of their respective properties situated at Nampally Cross Roads Hyderabad, having purchased the same under registered sale deeds, md they have been in peaceful possession and enjoyment of th,: same. He further submitred thar the respondents_GHMC are ir erfering with the possession of the subject properties by the 1:titioners without lollotvirrg due process as contemplated undr r Iaw. He further. subrnitred that in fact, the respondents_GHMc i; ued notices dated l9.l l.2Ol2 ro the petitioners calling upon th(r r to produce the ownership documents of their respective prop r ties and further intimating thcrn that their propenies would be affected in the L to Bazarghatt rmprovement. road/Ekm inar junctio from Ekminar junctic r Proposed road widening junction including Slip Learned senior counsel further submifted that the r :spondents have tnttrated any proceedings for acquisition o: the respective properties of the petitioners and have straightaway ssued notices to thc petitioners to produce the or.,rnership docu 1 ents, which is contrary to the scttled principle ollaw. By contend i rg thus, Ieamed senior counsel submitted that if the respective pr tperties of the .\ 3 LNA, J lfP.No.31E96 of 2011 and batch petitioners are required for the proposd road widening, the respondents-GHMc may be directed to foltow due process of law for acquisition and prayed to allow the Writ petitions. I \

5. [,eamed Standing Counsel for respondenb_GHMc submitted that if the respective properties of the petitioners are required for the proposed road widening, the respondents would initiate appropriate proceedings for acquisition of same in accordance with law. I I

6. Right to property.is a constitutional right and no person shall be dcprived o[ his/her property, however, the Government can acquirc private property if the same is required for pubtic purposc(s), by fotlowing due legal process. 7 . [n view of the same and recording the submissions o[ the leamed Standing Counsel for respondents-GHMc, these Writ Petitions are disposed of, directing the respondents_GHMC not to interfere with the respective properties of the petitioners except in accordance with the procedure contemplated under law. I 4 LNA. J WP.No.jlEg6 of 2dt l aM bdtch Miscellaneous petitions pending, if ar1 , shall stand crosed. 8 No costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/-I.I IME ABDUL AN ISTRAR TION OFFICER t p b n Development a The PrincrpaI Secreta ry, Munici al Administratior Department Secretariat, Hydera ad, Government o1 The Commissi oner, Greater Hy,derabad Municipal : lrporation, Having Office at Lower Tani Bund, Hydera Iiir$;hf:Y,f,i33ij[;J"*" prannins Seciion, o cre No.B, centrar Zone, One CC to SRt MOHD ZtA_ one cc ro sRr VEDULA ar"-'on'Advocate one cc ro SRTASHFAQ ort'*''ot'Advocate one cc to SRr M AR,N KU I:i:3*",?,",i,I"o5*.#;::ff-llu:i;;,|l,,,ro-hes,a,e.r Two CD Copies ' Advocate toPucr [opr, )J [opt, )j To, 1 2

4. 5 o

9. BSR BS ) ) HIGH COURT DATED: 1511012025 I COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.34896, 34898, 34922, 34945, :i4gi7, 34958 and 35178 ot 2014 ''.'.,;- 17 i-i ifiE -\, "/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITTONI;, WITHOUT COSTS \ \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments