The High Court · 2025

Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ...ResP<,t denU ResPondent

2. J. Dhana Lakshmi, Wo. J. Sai Kumar, Age. 46 Yean; Occ. Housewife, R/o. H No. 1-30-278/95,4, Telecom Colony, Kanajiguda \lwal, Secunderabad, PtN-500010 3 J. Sai Kumar, S/o. J. Pentaiah, Age.52 Years, Occ. Gl.l /C Employee, R/o. H. No 1-30-278/954, Telecom Colony, Kanajiguda. Alwa Secunderabad, PIN- 500010 ...Respondents/ \ccused Nos.2 and 4 Petition under Section 359(6) R/w 528 of BNSS :raying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of )riminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner for conrp rmise in C.C. No. 36 of 2021, on the file of XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan \ agistrate MSJ Court Complex, Secunderabad, in terms of the accompanied con1'omise memo and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may : -'em fit and proper in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) R/w.528 of BNSS )raying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of ( riminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to compound the offences for uashing the charge sheet in C.C. No. 36 ol 2021, on the file of XIX Additiori Chief Metropolitan Magistrate MSJ Court Complex, Secunderabad, in terms rf the accompanied compromise memo and to pass such other order or orders i s this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri RAJATH KUMAR PRADHAN, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 , and of Sri K.Venumadhav, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF 1.I .LANGANA AT ITYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREI' IIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.2 and, 3 of 2o25 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.14794 of 2 )25 Date:22.L2.2O25 Between : J.Dl-ran;r Laksl-rmi and another .Petitioners/A: uscd Nos.2 and 4 AND Thc Starc oI Tt:langana through S.H.O., P.S. Chilkalgtrda, represented by its Public Prosecutor, and urnother Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by the pe itioners/ accused Nos.2 and 4 seel<ing to quash the proceedings in (1 L No.36 of 2021 on the lilc of thr: XIX Additional Chief Metropolitrr I Magistratc, MSJ Court Cornplcx, Secunderabad.

2. Hcard Mr. Rajath Kumar Pradhan; learned :ounsel lbr thc petitioners, Mr.K.Venumadhav, learned counsel [<rr -espondent No.2 and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned i, ditional Public Prosccutor, appctrring on behalf of respondent No. 1 ll etc.

3. Learned counsel for thc petitioners submitte(l that during the pcnclency ol the prcsent Criminal Pe tition, at the in s atnce of 1l-re well .-! 2 wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the disputes pcnding between them and entered into compromise and filed Joint Compromise Memo. Accordingly, the parties have filed I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 secking permission to compromise the mattcr ancl to compound the offences respectively.

4. Thrs Court uide order, dated 04.12.2025, directed the parties i.e., the petitioners and respondent No.2, to appear before the High Court Lcgal Services Committee, Hyderabad, on 1 g. 12.2O2S. In compliance of the said order, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report, dated 17. 12.2025, stating that rhc petitioners and respondent No.2 were duly identified with copies ol their Aadhar cards. It is further stated that the parties have willfully and u'ithout any coercion entered into compromise.

5. [n view of the said report and also in view of the compromise entcred between the petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O25 are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in C.C. No.36 of 2O2I on the file of the XIX Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, MSJ court Complcx, Secunderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1O,0O0/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad and Rs.S,OOO/ - (Rupees five J thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Adi c :ate s Association, H1'derabad, by the petitioners, on or before.31.12.,2) !.5. Miscellancous applications, pending if any, str, ll stand closed SD/. ' PONNA KRISHNA ASSiI ;TANT REGISTRAR (*r'- //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate' Secunde 2. The Station House Officer, Chilkalguda Police Station' tl 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Slz Hyderabad [OUT] abad. derabad. e of Telangana at

4. One CC to SRI RAJATH KUNIAR PRADHAN' Advocakr 5. One CC to SRI K.VENUMADHAV, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD CoPies oPUCI A copy of Joint Memo of compromise enclosed h: ewith Note: Total Amount of Rs.15,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand orr I ) has been paid by M/sRajathKumarPradhan,CounselforthePetitionerasdr>ctedbytheHon,ble court vide order dated 22.12 2025 as Rs.5,000/- ( Rupees F r : thousand only ) to the..HighCourtLegalservicesCommittee,HighcourtforthtStateofTelangana, thousand only ) to High Court Buildings Hyderabad, and Rs 5'0001 ( Rupees F ' = the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderab: r and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No 152371 of 2025 ' NVB/ABK JkE -:--::T + F HIGH COURT DATED:2211212025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.14794 of 2025 lHE Sr4 6 0 3 iiB 7tl26 e * I ,+ t ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION rlND l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 J K< 2-, l,l-, =='tl!lqrEu;i IN THD HIGH COURT FOR THE STATD OF TELANGANA AT:: HYDERABAD Crl.P. No. of 2025 TN C.C. No. 36 of 2021, On thc file of [Ion'ble XIX Additicnal Chief Metropolitan Magistrate MSJ Court Complex, Secunderabad. Befuveen:- l). J. Dhana Lakshmi Wo. J. Sai Kumar, Age: 46 Years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H. No. l-30-278195A, Telecom Colony, Kanaj iguda, Alwal, Secunderabad. j-6s6lo 2). J. Sai Kumar S/o. J. Pentaiah, Age:52 Years, Occ: GHMC Employee, -=., R/o. H. No. l-30-278195A, T'elecom Colony, Kana.jiguda, Alwal, Secunderabad. Soool 0 . . . Petitioners/Accused No's. 2 and 4. AND 1). The State of Telangana through S.H.O., P.S. Chilkalguda, represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. . . . Respondent. 2). Kancharla Babu Rao Sio. Late. Gopinath (Gopaiah), Age:77 Years, Occ: Retired Divisional Engineer (IJPDCL/Warangal), R/o. Flat No. 502, I-Ieavenly I{omes, Alkapuri, Road No. 1, SN( Puram, s00o3 f Hyderabad. . . . RespondenL4De-facto Complainant. JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO FILED BY THB PETITIONERS AND THE RESPONDENT No.2. !-r- \ .P:"- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF 1' ]LANGANA AT:: HYDERABAD Crl.P. No. of 20.1 IN on the nre orHon,brc f;ii,[";,1%',1,31'^il,,."poritr r Magisrrarc MSJ ",* Court Complex, Secunderabad. Between:- 1). J. Dhana Lakshmi Wo. J. Sai Kumar, Age: 46 Years, Occ: Housewife, Y" ll N: 1-30-2T9tssA,Telecom Cotony, Kanaj iguda, Alwal, Secunderabad. 5oooio 2). J. Sai Kumar S/o. J. pentaiah, Age: 52 Years, Occ: GI{MC Employee, -,r Y, I.N9 l-30-278t95A, Tetecom Colony, Kana.liguda, Alwal. Secunderabad. 56661 O . . . Petitioners/Accu cd No,s. 2 and, 4. AND 1). The State of Telanga:ra tkough S.H.O., p.S. Chitkatguda, represented by Public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. 2). Kancharla Babu l(ao Sio. Lare. Gopinarh (Gooaiah). Age:77 Years. Occ: Retir.ecl Divisional nngineer 1-N I)DCLlWr, , rgal). R/o. Flat No. 502, Heavenly Homes, Alkapuri, Road No. l, SllK puram, s60o3 $- I{yderabad. . . . Respondent. . Respondent/De-fai:t I Complainant JOINT CO MPROMIS E MEMO I'ILBD BY THE PETITIONERS AND THE RESPONDE NT lr r.2. .:b J 4). It is submitted that, thereafter, the respondent No.2 herein had executed a registered cancellation deed document No. g2g of 2017,dated 0g-03_ 2017, cancelling the said registered sale deed document No. 2247 of2016, dated 01-06-20t6 5). It is submitted that, the Accused No. 3 had filed a writ petition in w.p. No. 18285 of 2017, before this Hon'bie court chailenging the said registered cancellation deed document No. 82g ot 2017, dated 0g-03-20 17. The said writ petition was dismissed through orders clated 3l-07-2025. 6). It is submitted that, now at the intervention of elders and well wishers the parties got resolved the differences which arose bet\.veen them in terms of the said settlement the petitioners herein and the Accused No. 3, 5 and 6 assured to the respondent No. 2 that, they shall not interfere and shall not claim any right over the said subject matter plot of land and in regarding with the said cancellation deed document No. 828 of 2017, dated 0g-03-2017, and also assured the respondent IrJo. 2 that, they will not interfere in any manner in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said ptot of land with the respondent No. 2 and also shown their readiness to cooperate in all aspects before all authorities, for getting permission or to deal with in any manner by the respondent No. 2 in regarding with his plot of land, for which the respondent No. 2 had accepted to cooperate for getting the quash of the charge 4 sheeL/criminal proceedings against the petitioners alLr the Accused No,s. 3, 5 and 6, accordingly this joint compromise memo is ente., d into. 7). Tl-tat, t,e petitioners assures rhat, they shall no :laim any right or interest and sha' not interfere in any manner in regarding v h the above stated Plot No. 67 inpart o1'sy. No. 15 (old No. 30/2), admeasurinr 333.33 Sq. yds or 278.69 Sq. MtrS situated at padmarao Nagar, Zamistanpur, Sr ;unclerabad. while enjoying the same by the respondent No. 2. I h is will and rvish and the 8). That, the respondent No. 2 can deal with his abovi: jtated plot as per petitioners assures the respondenl No. 2 that, they shall cooperate in ail aspects with the respondent No.2 in err. rying or dearing t'vith in any manner in regarding with the said plot before r ll authorities or wherever respondent No. 2 requests 9). That, the Accused No. 3 assured the respondent No. Z that. he shall I 18 i of 2025, if so rvithdraw the writ appeal filed by him i.e., in W.A. No advices by fi ling appropriate affi davit/petition. l0). That, thb respondent No. 2 can getbac/getretum tlrr: .cgisrered deed documenr No.2247 of 20l6,dated 0l_06_2016, which is ii :d along with charge sheet before the Hon'bre xX Additionar chief Metropoli r r Magistrate, d^-"4*!r-&/,----J ,a H 5 at Secunderabad, for which the petitioners and other Accused Nols. 3, 5 and 6, have no objection and are ready to cooperate for the same 11). That, the petitionel herein along rvith the Accused No. 3 had fited a suit in O.S. No. 679 of 2016, on the file olHon'ble I Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad, against one Rajnikanth showing that, he is the son of the respondent No. 2 and 2 others for perpetual injunction, the said suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiffs, through this settlement the petitioner No. I and the Accused No.3 who are the plaintiffs in the said suit assures the respondent No. 2 that, they do not claim any such right and they shall not interfere in any manner in regarding rvirl-r peacelul possession and enjoyment of the subject matter plot of land while enjoying by thc respondent No. 2 as the respondent No. 2 is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. l2). That, the respondent No. 2 has no objection for quashing of this criminal proceedings by altowing this quash petition. 13). That, the respondent No. 2 shall file an affidavit to the eflect that, he has no objection for quashing of the crininal proceedings by atlowing this criminal petition. l,i,t .-r, 6 l-t I4). For all tite reasons stated above. this Hon'blc Cor r ma). be pleased to quash the charge sheet in C.C. No. 36 of 2021, on the filr of Hon'blc XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate MSJ Court Compl,: , Secunderabad, as against the petitionersAccused No's. 2 and 4, and to pass s.r :h other ordcr or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the inre .est ofjustice. Date: 06-11-2025. I'lace: Hydcrabad. /Y-"sl"'l^ 'etitioner No. l. etitiouer No. 2. t Counse[ for I 4 -"ru_ e Petitioners. Ii,r pondentNo. 2 l counser",(€t ,l ;ondent No. 2