The High Court · 2025

07.1O.2025 in W.P.No.30261 of 2025 on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. Kasi Reddy Panduranga Reddy, S/o. Late Kasireddy Ramchandra Reddy, Aged about 74 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H. No. 402, Airbus Apartments, Vittalwadi, Narayanguda, Hyderabad.

2. Komirelly Suryakala Reddy, W/o. Late Komirelly Jayapal Reddy, Aged about 72yearc, Occ. House hold, Fi,to. H. No.2-2-181 18141241A, D D Colony, Bagh Amberpet, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

3. Kasireddy Bhujender Reddy, S/o. Late KasiReddy Ramchandra Reddy, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Villa No.8 and 9, Sitarama homes, Bachupally, NizamPet, Hyderabad.

4. Kasireddy Vemana Reddy, S/ o. Late Kasireddy Ramchandra Reddy, Aged about 67 years, Occ. Business, R/o. 8-3-318/1 114, Jayarakash Nagar, Yellareddy Guda, HYderabad-73.

5. Sarasam Abharna Devi, W/o. Late Sarasam Rama Krishna Reddy, Aged about 65 years, Occ. House hold, Ryo. 11, Mahalaxmi Residency, Kompally, Ranga Reddy-14.

6. Sunki Reddy Vaidehi, Wio. Sunki Reddy Rajasekhar reddy, Aged about 58 years, Occ. House hold, No. 3-6-2241225, flat No. 302, Sreedevi estates, Street No.-16, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad-29.

7. Dr. Kasi Reddy Maheshwar Reddy, S/o. Kasireddy Bhujender Reddy, Aged about 41 Years, Occ. Doctor (Pediatric Dentist), R/o. H.No. 8-4-33Ol1lA, Kalpataru Residency, A-1406, Prem Nagar, Erragadda, Hyderabad, T.S.- 500018 (Petitioner No. 7 is the GPA holder of Petitioner No. 1 to 6) ...APPELLANTSMRIT PETITIONERS AND 1 2 The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State- The District Collector, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, At Malkajgiri, T.S

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Medchal-Malkajgiri Di:t ict, At Malkajgiri, T S 4. The Tahsildar, Bachupally Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri t istrict, T.S, 5. The Station House Officer, Bachupally Police St I ion, At. Bachupally, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

6. Kolan Krishna Reddy, S/o. Not known, Aged about: 6) years, Occ.Business, Medchal- flq, H No. 1-47, Near Grama panchayathi, Bachupat y lValkajgiri District, Telangana State. 'Nizampet,

7. Kolan Seetharam R"gqy, S/q. Not known, Ager about: 65 years, Occ.business, Rl/o. H.No. 1-47, Near Grama pirrr hayathi, Bachupally, Nizampet, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana Stbte

8. Kolan Bal!|Reddy, S/o. Not known, Aged about. Majr,r Occ. business, Rl/o. H.No. 1-47, Near Grama panchayathi, Bachupally Nizampet, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, Telangana State.

9. Kolan Jeevan Reddy, S/o. Not known, Aged about. Ma1: , Occ. business, Rl/o. H.No. '1-47, Near Grama panchayath-i, Bachupally. Nizampet, Medchal- tvlalkajgiri District, Telangana State. ..RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cot r may be pleased to stay the entire proceedings in pursuance of the Notice ,ide. reference No. 937/CrlBcpl/Cyb/2025. dated, 15.09.2025 issued by the re:;; ondent No.5 (SHO, Police Bachupally) to the respondent No. 4 (Hon'ble Secor J class tvlagistrate- Cum-Tahsildar, Bachupally Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri t istrict directing to conduct the survey and demarcate the petitioners Land anl to take possession of the disputed land in Sy No. 458 admeasuring dbout .l 117 [ q yards, situated at Bachupally Village and Mandal, now Medchal-Malkajgiri Dis rict till the pending disposal of this writ petition Counsel for the Appeltants: SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: SRI MURALIDHAR t EDDY KATRAM, GP FOR REVE ! JE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 9: - The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEALNo.l274 OF 2o25 Ms. Surcsh Shiv Sagar, learned counsel appearing for thc appcilants. Mr. Muralidhar Reddy Katram, the learned Government Plcader loa Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)

1. The Appeal arises out of an ordcr dated 07.1O.2O25 passed by a lcarned Single Juclge of this Court in W.P.No.3O26\ of 2025.

2. By the impugned order dated 07.1O.2O25, the learned Single ..ludge dismissed the Writ Petition hled by the appellants/writ petitioners on the ground that there was no error in the impugned Noticc dated 16.O9 .2025 issued by the respondent No.5. The learned Singlc Judge also noted that the writ petitioncrs should havc approached the respondent No.4 and submitted all relevant documcnts and an explalation in terms of section 164 ol The Bhbratiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 wiLin a request to set :rsidc the proceedings or to delcte the subject property from the said proceedings. I \

3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants/writ petitioners submits that contrary to the finding of the learned Single Judge, the ( { 2 appellants had given a reply to the Notice impul,r ed in the Writ Petition on 20.O9.2O25

4. We, horvever, note that the impugned order t ( cs not mention ary facts with regard to the reply given by the appellants/writ petitioners. Admittedly, the appellants did not brin; this fact to the noticc of the lcarned Single Judge. Nothing prevetl { lhe appellants from approaching the concerned authority an,i raising their objections before the said authority. The appeller ts shall be at libcrty to approach the conccrned respondents. We a.r o note that the impugned Notice rvas received by the appeilants on _ b.09.2025 and the Writ Petition u,as filcd on the very next date i.e., I r 09.2025.

5. We, accordingly, do not hnd any error in the i.-rpugned orcler passed by the learned Single Judge.

6. W.A.No. 1274 of 2O25, along with all connected pplications, is accordingly dismissed. 'l'herc shall be no order as to ( ( sts. //TRUE COPYII SD/.MOHD.ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR ,{) \ CTION OFFICER To

1. One CC to SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR, Advocate tOpLrr :1 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the St rte of Telangana at for Home, High Court for the Sre:e of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies MP LS W I{IGH COURT DATI: D:1811112025 '., j/ t4rl :;: s o ./ JUDGMENT WA.Nr: .1274 o12025 DISMISSING THE I' IRIT APPEAL WIT'I{OUT COSTS a d' dar I