Dasari Priyanka v. 1. The State of Telangana

2. The Station House Officer, Jeedimetla, PS Jeedimetla Ranga, Reddy District. 3. The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad, Gachibowli. 4. Mr.Shankar Reddy, S/ o. not know to the petitioner, Presently working as Cl of Police, Jeedimetla.

5. Mr. Srinivas, S/o. not know to the petitioner Presently, working as Sl of Police, Jeedimetla.

6. Saidi Reddy, S/o. not known to the petitioner Presently, working as Sl of police, Jeedimetla.

7. The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declare the action Respondent Nos.4 to 6 herein illegally and criminally interfering in civil dispute in immovable property situated at Kalavathinagar, Shapur, Ranga Reddy District and threatening the petitioner and family members to register a false cases if not vacated and also declare the in action of the Respondent No. 4 herein in not registering the complaint dated-

06.08.2017 lodged by the petitioner mother as illegal and against the law and punishable for disobeying the law and offence under SC/ST POA Act. lt is also further prayed that declare the action of the Respondent No.5 & 6 herein misbehaving with the petitioner and sister of the petitioner while confining in the police station as an offence under criminal law and direct the Respondent No. 3 herein to register a criminal case against the Respondent No. 4 to 6 herein and investigate by the independent agency. lt is also further prayed to direct Respondent No. 3 and 7 herein to provide police protection to the petitioner and family members as there is a threat to the life and personal liberty in the hands of culprits and Respondent No. 4 to 6 herein. l.A.NO:1 OF 2017 (WPMP.NO:37555 OF 2017) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 herein to register the complaint filed by petitioner mother dated: 06.08.20'1 7 against culprits who illegally trespassed and committed theft under lndian Penal Code. l.A.NO:2 OF 2017 (WPMP.NO:37556 OF 2017 Petition Under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 herein to provide police protection to the petitioner herein and family members as per the complaint dated:22.O}.2017. l.A.NO:3 OF 2017 (WPMP.NO:37557 OF 20171 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 & 7 herein to register the complaint filed by the petitioner herein dated:22.08.2017 and investigate fairly and effectively. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V.RAGHUNATH SMT. D. PRIYANKA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 & 7 : SRI M.SRINIVAS, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : -- The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BI..E SRIJUSTICE N, TUKARAMJI WRIT PETI]'|ON No.30138 OF 2017 ORDEF{ Tris Writ Petition is flled with the following relief: 'fo rssrie writ. order or direction, more particularly one in the nature o{ WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of respotlcisi)l Nos.4 to 6 herein i ega y land criminally inteffenng in civil dispure in immo\.,able property situated at Kalavathinagar, Shaour. Ranga Reddy District and threatening the petitioner and fam;ly mernbers to register false cases if not vacated and also declare the inaction of respondent No.4 herein in not registering the complaint dated 06.08.2017 lodged by the petitioner mother as i egal anC against the law and publishable for disobeying the law and offence under SC{ST POA Act. /f ls a/so fufther prayed that deciare the action of respondent l\los.5 and 6 herein misbehaving \titl) lhe petitioner and slsier of the petitioner while confining in the police station as an offence under criminal law and direct the respuldettt No.3 herein to register a criminal case against the rcspondetl! No 4 to 6 herein and investigate by the independent a(teitcy. lt is also furttrcr prayed to clirect the respondent Nos.4 to 6 herein and investigate by the independent agency. /l rb a/so iurltier prayed to direct respondent Nos.3 and 7 herein to provide police pratection to tlte petitioner and family members as ihere ls a thrcat to the life and personal libefty in the hands of culprits and respondeii Nos.4 to 6 herein. ..... ..."

2. Mrs D. Priyanka, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that since respondent No.4 failed to register a crime 2 based on the complaint dated 06.08.2017 lodged by the petitioner's mother, and as the unofficial respondents have been misbehaving with the petitioner and her sister by threatening to implicate them in false criminal cases. the present writ petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions from this Hon'ble Court

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, pursuant to the representation dated 06.08.2017, Crime No.B23 ol 2017 was registered, and upon completlon of investigation, a charge sheet was filed and taken on file as C.C. No.720 o'f 2017 on the file of the learned XXI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad. lt is further submitted that during the pendency of the said proceedings, the partres amicabiy settled their disputes before the Lok Adalat on 21.06.2018, and the offences were formally compounded on the same day. Hence, it is contended that nothing further survives for adjudication in this matter

4. I have perused the material available on record

5. Having regard to the submissions made and the developments that occurred during the pendency of this petition, 3 it is evident that a crime was duly registered, the investigation was completed, and a charge sheet was filed, culminating in the numbering of the Calendar Case. ln view of the amicable settlement ieported before the Lok Adalat and the formal compounding of offences. the grievance of the petitioner stands effectiveiy i'edressed Consequently, nothing further remains for consideration in this writ petition

6. AccorCingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous No order-as to costs. lVliscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Petition shall stand closed //TRUE COPY/i To Hyderabad. [OUT]

1. Two CCs to GP for HOME, High Court for 2. One CC to SRI V.RAGHUNATH, Advocate [OPU 3. One CC to SMT D. PRIYANKA, Advocate IOPUCI 4. Two CD Copies SA/MP Pqc.. P.C. SULEKHA DEVI STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER State of Telangana at o. lt A- I 3 10 FEB 2026 ( 7 -/. * I ,{' '5;:*' HIGH COURT DATED:1011012025 ORDER WP.No.3O138 of 2017 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. (- 1 ot\'l>4'