✦ High Court of India · 07 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 07 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
07 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,208 words

The State of Telangana, Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Telangana State, rep. by its Chairman and l\,4anaging Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. The Chief General Manager, (Revenue), TSSPDCL, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. The Superintendent of Engineer, Operation Circle,TSSPDCL, Siddipet., Siddipet District The Senior Accounts Officer, TSSPDCL, Siddipet, Siddipet O,",r,.,. ...*aaroNDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a Writ of ltrlandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or orders declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in levying surcharge on the late payment incentives granted by the government and insisting payment of surcharge by the consumer as wholly arbitrary illegal and without jurisdiction offending the principles of natural justice and void and consequently direct the respondents not to levy and collect late payment surcharge from the petitioner lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under section 15'l cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to issue a direction to the respondents 2 to 5 not to levy and insist payment of late payment _.-------7 charges (surcharge) from the petitioner on the incentive granted by the gorr€iriment pending disposal of the writ petition lA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition underr Section 151 CPC praying that in the ,:ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in sr,rpport of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to direct respondents 2 to 5 either to pay back or adjust Rs.75, BB, 863/- in the further C.C. bills lA NO: 1 OF 2023: Betwee n: 1 2 2 4 AND 1 2 The Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Torangana State, rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Mint Compound, Hydr:rabad. The Chief General f\rlanager, (Revenue). TSSPDCL, ft4inl Compound, Hyderabad. The Superinter.rdent of Engineer, Operation Circle,TSSPlCL. Siddipet., Siddipet District rhe Senior Accounts officer, rssPDCL. .,oo,r:1:r?9$,ti..i.?,S,,I8!ro*o.Nrs 2 ro 5 Itrl/s Sitaram Spinners Pvt. Ltd, Registered Office RamaTowers, D.No.5-4-83, 2nd Floor, TSK Chambers, M-G. Road, Secunderabad- trll Rep. by its Managing Director, [/r. Pramod Aganrual. The State of Telangana, Energy Department, Rep. by its .!;pecial Chief Secretary, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad. . .RESPONDENT/PETITIONER ...It ESPON DENT/RES PON DE NT Petition under llection 151 CPC praying that in the cirr;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders datecl 1 311212022 in WP.No. 44561 of 2022 and dismiss the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ERIGI GANESH Counsel for Respondent No. 1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5: SRI N. SREEDHAR REDI)Y' SC FOR TSSPDCL WP NO: 44565 OF 2a2:2 Between: Rama Soinners P!'t. Ltd, Registered Office Rama Towers, D.No.5-4-83, Lind Floor, fSrcbn5mners, M G.Road.-Secunderabad, Rep. by its l\Ianaging Director, Gopal Aoarwal. ..PETITIONER AND -

1. The State of Telangana, Energy Department, Rep. by its Special Ctriet SeCi&lrV, 2. The Southern Power Distribution Company, Limited of Telangana State, rep. by its TS Secretariat, Hyderabad. Chairman And [\,4anaging Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad.

3. The Chief General Manager, (Revenue), TSSPDCL, [Vint Compound, Hy'derabad. 4. The Superintendent of Engineer, Operation Circle,TSSPDCL, Medak, tr/edak District

5. The Senior Accounts Officer, TSSPDCL, MeUak, Medak District. ...RESpoNDENrs Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a Writ of lvlandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or orders declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in levying surcharge on the late payment incentives granted by the government and insisting payment by the consumer as wholly arbitrary illegal and without lurisdiction offending the principles of natural .justice and void and consequently direct the respondents not to levy and collect late payment surcharge from the petitioner lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To issue a direction to the respondents 2 to 5 not to levy and insist payment of late payment charges (surcharge) from the petitioner on the incentive granted by the government lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the t respondents either to pay or adjust Rs.18,49,996 lA NO: 1 OF 2O23: Between: 1 2 ? 4 AND 1 The Southern Power Distribution Company, Limited of Telangana State, rep. by its Chairman And Managing Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. The Chief General Manager, (Revenue), TSSPDCL, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. The Superintendent of Engineer, Operation Circle,TSSPDCL, Ivledak, Medak District rhe Senior Accounts orricer, rssPDCL, '"0'1'..YE+#o?E[!%.rro*DENrs 2 ro 5 agplSpinners Pvt L!d, Registered Office Rama Towers, D.No.5-4-83, Lind Floor, TSK Chambers, tt4.G.Road, Secunderabad, Rep. by its t\rlanaging Director, Gopai Agarwal. .., R ES PON DENT/PETITION ER

2. The State of Telangana, Energy Depa(ment, Rep. by its Special Chief Se TS Secretariat, Hyderabad. qfeta ry .,. R E S PON DENT/RESPON DENT Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c.ircumstances st6ted in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High..Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders daled 1311212022 in VlP. No. 44565 of 2022 and dismiss the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ERIGI GANESH Counsel for Respondent No. 1:GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 5: SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION Nos.44561 and 44565 OF 2o22 COMMON ORDER: When these matters are taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these petitions.

2. Permission as sought for is accorded.

3. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. There shail be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. I //TRUE COPY' sD/- c. DEEPIK4/ STANT REGISTRAfi' SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to Sri Erig i Ganesh Advocate TOPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP 3. One CC to Sri N 4. Two CD CoPies Fo r Energy ,Hig h Court for the State of Sreedhar Redd y, SC for TSSP DCL (OPU langana. [OUT] c) IVBC w \ HIGH COIJRT DATED: 0711012025 lrlE S ri 17 0[T ?025 t .6) (J ( l: C()MMON ORDER WRIT PETITION NO: 44561 AND 44565 oF 2022 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS AI] WITHDRAWN' @ I 0r( \tl 10 WNTHOUT COSTS

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments