The High Court · 2025

AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Dr-B,R.Ambedkar Telangana State Secretariat, Khairtabad, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Police Commissionerate, Office at 3. The Station House Officer, Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Police 4 Smt. Noorjahan Shaik, Wo. Shaik Jan Shahid, aged about 28 Years, Occ. Sainikpuri, Neredmet, Medchal lvlalkajgiri District, Telangana State. Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. Private Employee, Rl/o. 8-638/4, Jamuna School Road, Sri Vani public School Area, Near lvlunicipal Office, Piduguralla Town, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh - 522 413. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [,4andamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 in not taking any action against the respondent No.4 by receiving the Complaint Dated 07-09-2025 filed by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14,16,19,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of India, Consequently direct the respondent No.3 to take necessary action against the respondent No.4 by following procedure of law by protecting petitioner's rights and his daughter's rights and life from the hands of respondent No.4 by following proced ure of law. ,d lA NO: 1 OF 2O2s Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the rircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court r ay be preased to direct the respondent No.3 to dispose of the compraint dated ( 7 -og-202s fired by the petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATA RAGHU MANl.ll :pALLl Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 3: AGp FOR HOMt Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: -- The Court made the foltowing: ORDER HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.34173 OF 2o25 ORDER This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: "...declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in not taking ang action against the respondent No.4 by receiuing the Complaint Dated 07.09.2025 filed bg the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and in uiolation of Prhrciples of Natural Justice and in uiolation of Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 30OA of Constitution of India Consequently direct the respondent No.3 to take necessary action against the respondent No.4 bg foLlotuing procedure of lau,t bg protecting petitioners ights and his daughters ights and life from the hands of respondent No.4 bg follouing procedure of lau. . . "

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. I to 3. With their consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal. Notice to respondent No.4 is hereby dispensed r,r,ith

3. The facts of the case in brief as stated are that petitioner lodged a written complaint for taking action against L .- :i2ii petitioner's wife who has connections with 'elangana Supari Galg and also tried to kill the petitioner and ri rther demanding Rs.4 Crores cash in case the petitioner intenc s to give divorce In that regard, petitioner filed a writ petition ir W.P.No.25148 of 2O25 before this Court and this Court dispose I of the sarne on 26 .O8.2O25 with a direction to petition, r to approach respondent No.4 therein and lodge fresh co r Lplaint and once such complaint is received respondent No.4 r directed to take action strictly in accordance to law. Subserl rently, petitioner approached respondent No.3 herein and suL mitted a written complaint on 07 .O9.2O25 against his wife . tarrating all the events. Since no action is forthcoming, the pre ;ent writ petition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Government Plea I :r for Home, on instructions wouid submit that respondent Nr> 3 did not receive any complaint alleged to be lodged by the 1>:titioner and the petitioner has never approached the Police Si ation along with copy of complaint. It is further submitted thie, as and when the petitioner approaches the respondent Police with a copy of complaint, appropriate action wili be initiate<l as per law. It is I ::3:: further submitted that instead of approaching respondent No.3 Police, petitioner has directly approached this Court by way of this writ petition

5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel on either side, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent authorities to consider the complaint of the petitioner dated 07 .O9.2025 filed along ndth material papers of this writ petition and take appropriate action by following due procedure as contemplated under law within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above observations, this writ petition disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No costs //TRUE COPY// SD/.P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (->- SECTION OFFICER The Pnncipal 99"191r.y, Home Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Telangana State-Secretariat, Khairtabad,Alyderabad, State of Telangana. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda police Commiisionerate, Office at Sain ikpuri, Nered mel, Ivledcha I tValkajgiri District, Telangana Staie.' The Station House Officer, Hayathna[ar police Station, Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy Distiict, Telanqana State. One CC to SRI VENKATA RAGHU I\IANNEPAiL|, Advocate tOpUCl Two CCs to GP FOR HOIVE, High Court for the State of Telangana, it Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies "Rachakonda police To 1 2 ?) 4 5 6 PSK- BS HIGH COURT DATED:1 111112025 ORDER WP.No.34173 of 2025 .4 i: iE ij 14. 'a t.) 1" Eic mt ,,., >: .i, , ' r(11)tL!-' ...r- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETiTION WITHOUT COSTS ( J 6( I /