High Court · 2025

Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pteased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the illegal, arbitrary and unilateral action of the 3rd respondent in alteration/changing the village revenue records in patta as well possession columns in favour of the 4th and 6th respondnets, thereby issuing Pattadar Pass Books and Title deeds in their favour to the property of petitioner in Sy.Nos.78 and 79 to an extent of Ac.1.13gts and Ac1.18 gts respectivell, situated at Ellandakunta Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District despite objections dated 06.10.2017 of the petitioner filed before 2nd and 3rd respondents arrd during pendency of Revision in No. D111O5512017, on the file of the 2nd respondent without any notice or hearing the petitioner and/or following the procedure envisaged, under the AP/TS Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act,26 of 1971and the Rules,1989, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 3Or)-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 2ndrespondent tq 'cancel the pass books and title deeds issued to unofficial respondents hqlding the mutation dated 22.12.2016 are illegal, without any mode of acquisition of right over the above property thereby to direct the 3rd respondent to restore the original entr:ies standing on the name of the petitioner in the records in relevant columns in respect of the aforementioned property forthwith lA NO: I oF 20{8 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fihd in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th and Sth respondents not to create any third party interest respect of the property irr Sy.Nos.78 and 79 to an extent of Ac.1.13Gts and Ac1.18gts respectively sirluated at Ellandakunta Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District based upon the patta pass books issued by the 3rd respondent till the disposal of Revision in No.D1l 105512017 and pending disposal of the above writ petition lA NO: 2 oF m20 Petition rlnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fil,ad in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to place the material papers on record, narnely 1. The copy of Complaint Erated 2O.OO-2019. 2. Proceedings dated 30.09.2019 of the District Registrar. 3. Proceedings dated 19.05.20120 of the District Registrar. 4. proceedings dated 19.09.2020 of Commissioner & lG state of Telangana. 5. Representatiorr dated 09.10.2020' &, 10.10.2020 by receiving as additional material papeni on record pending disposal of the above writ petition lA NO: { OF 2020 : , . :,:-: the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to take op the issue for cancel the proceedings dated 2211212016 of',the 3rd respondent in the pending revision on the file of the 2nd ,: respondent , ,' ,:, ., /, ,/ Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI Counse! forthe Respondent Nos.1to3: GP FOR REVENUE rtglrvaavvrra . : .. Coupsel for the Respondent Nos.4&5:- The Courl made the following: ORDER I i THE HON'BLE SRI JI,STICE K.SARATH WRIT PEIITION .3,2760 2018 oRDEB! Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and learned counsel for the unofficial respondent Nos.4 and 5 and peruse<l the material on record.

2. This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent No.3 in alteration/changing the Village Revenue Records in ..Patta as wetl possession columrrs in favour of the respondent Nos.4 and 5, thereblr issuing Pattadar Pass Books and Title deeds in their fa.vour to the propert5r of petitioner in Sy.Nos.78 and 79 to ran extent of Ac.1-13 guntas and Ac.1-18 guntas respecl:ively, situated at Ellar,rdakunta Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District, despite objections dated

06.10.:20 L7 of the petitioner filed before respondent Nos.2 2 and" 3 and also pending the Revision in No.D1 /LO55/2O17 on the file of the respondent No.2, without any notice or hearing the petitioner and/or following "the procedure envisaged under the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, t97 | and the Rules,1989, as illegal and arbitrarl,.

3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the unofficial respondents submitted that after filing of the present writ petition, the Revision filed by the petitioner in No.D1 I LO55 /2OLZ before respondent No.2-District Collector, Karimangar, was transferred to Special Tribunal, Karimnagar District, which was established under the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2O2O. The said Revision was renumbered as ST No.85/2O2LlDlllO55/2O18 and disposed of uide order dated O6.O2.2O2L directing the respondents to maintain statrrs quo with regard to the entries in the i i: 1. It Ii \ 3 revemre records and the unofficial respondents shall not create any third party interest over the propert5r in dispute, as ordered by this Court aide order dated L4.49.2O18 pending disposal of the present writ petition.

4. However, pending disposal of the present writ petition, the respondent authorities took steps to amend the revenue entries in favour of the unoflicial resporLdents. In view of the above circumstances, both the counsel appearing for the contesting parties submitted that tJ.e Revision Petition filed by the petitio ner has to be disposed of on merits and the respor:.dent authorities have to reopen the Revision filed by thr: petitioner and after hearing both sides, pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance witl, law.

5. In view of the submissions made on either side and on perusing the entire material on record, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No.2- Revisionary Authority to rebpen the Revision Petition fited \ t \ 4 by the petitioner in No:D L / LO55 /2OL7 , which was renumbered. as ST No.85/2 O2L /DL / LO55|2OL8 and ordered on 06.O2.2O2L. After reopening of the Revision Petition, the respondent authorities shall issue notice to the petitioner as well as the unoflicial respondents and It, , afford them an opporhrnity of personal hearing along with additional documents and pass appropriate orders '/ / as per law i.e. Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2024. However, the interim order dated

14.09.2018 passed by this Court shall continue tiIl the disposal of the Revision Petition frled by the petitioner.

6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. - M.OSttlAN ALI STANT REG I ,,TRUE COPY" SECTION OFFICER To, T.S.,HYderabad 1 . The Principal Secretary, I Departrnent of Revenue'Secretariat Build ings' 2. The Coltectot rrO District Magistrab, Karimna.gar District at Karimnagar' 3. The Tahs iro* J,t "nilifiii'n?re-n uJ bfiice ;, E r"ra nd a ku nta Reven ue M an d a t, 4. ffi; CCio SR-i.'"' lNlvAs-^ BAo PUTLURI, fdvgcale [oPyg]. 5. Two CCs to cP Etifl'ilivfiii0e-;Higtt Court for the Staie of Telangana at 6. Two CD CoPies Hyderabad IOUTI PSKv BM r-Ei;ii.tr:, ( I ] a HIGH COURT DATED i'[110912025 I t ! : I ( 3 .l r-1.- ir ? 3 JAN ioil )t .fr.-. ,::> ORDER WP.No.32760 of 2018 DISPOSIING OF THE WRIT PETITION WTHOU'T COSTS sxv/ w2t'