Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ,TRUE COPY' Sd/ v. KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR . SECTION OFFICER I To

AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad

2. Santosh Reddy Veerlapally, S/o. Sri Ram Reddy, Aged about 27 years,Occ. Business, R/o. H.No. 4-10, Dabilpur Village, A/ledchal-l\/alkajgiri District ...Respondent / Respondent ...Respondent / Accused Petition under Section 359 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/2nd Respondent to compromise the case on the file of FlR.No. 458 of 2023, daled 19-05-2023 registered by the Police, Pe! Basheerabad and Charge Sheet SC No.46 of 2024, dated 1510712023 on the file of the Hon'ble ll Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medchal-lvlalkajgiri District, at lvledchal with the accused by allowing the Criminal Petition. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Petrtion under Section 359 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to compound the offence and quash the proceedings in FIR No.458 of 2023, dated 19-05-2023 registered by the Police, PelBasheerabad and Charge Sheet SC No. 46 of 2024 on the file of the Hon'ble ll Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Medchal in view of the compromise entered between the Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A p Suresh Ram, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and of Sri T Raghunath Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following Common Order HON'I}LE SMT. JUSTICI] JU\ryADI SRIDEVI I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 in/a n d CRIMINAL PETITION No.15278 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings against him in S.C.No.46 of 2024 on the file of Il Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Medchal, registered for the ofl'ences punishable under Section 304B ofIPC.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offence.

3. Vide order daled 17.12.2024, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court I 2 for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a repoft. I

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Cornmittee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 19.12.2024 and the same is placed on record. 5' In view of the above, I-A.Nos.2 and 3 0f 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in S.C.No.46 of 2024 on the file of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Medchal, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ,TRUE COPY' Sd/- V. KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ) \. SECTION OFFICER I To 1 2 3 4 5 o 7 The lX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Medchal The Station House Officer, Petbasheerabad PS, Cyberabad District Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to Sri A P Suresh Ram, Advocate IOPUC] One CC to Sri T Raghunath Reddy, Advocate IOPUC] Two CD Copies ll Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri. I Along with the Copy of the Joint Memo of Compromise ] %;o,on I HIGH COURT FOR THE S TE OF TELANGANA, AT HYDERABAD s.-- fflvf?.No of2024 IN cRL.P.No. 1 Q 2024 Between: Santosh Reddy Veerlapally, S/o Sri Ram Reddy, Aged about 27 years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No. 4-10, Dabilpur Viliage, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. ...Petitioner/Accused And I

2. The State ofTeiangana Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. Mesthri Narsimha Reddy, S/o Late Hanumanth Reddy, Aged about 62years, Occ: Retd.Employee, R/o H.No.49-411/5/d, Bapu Nagar Colony, Street No.5, Chintal, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad . . . Respondents/Complainant JOINT MEMO OI,'COMPROMISE FILED tsY THE PETITI ONER ANID THE RESPONDENT NO.2 The Petitioner and 2nd Respondent most respectfully submit as follows:

1. Whereas the Petitioner is accused in proceedings in FIR No. 458 of 2023 registered by Police, Pet-Basheerabad and SC No.46 of 2024, on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri I I I I \d' \' { District, At: Medchaland he is being prosecuied for offences under seclion .?04-(B) and 498-(,4) of I.p.C. 2 Whereas, pending the investigation in the above case against the Petitioner, the 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant came to know that his daughter cornmitted suicide due to her personar reasons and not for the reasons alleged in the FIR. Accordingly, the 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant decided to amicably resolve all issues arising out of the criminal proceedings with the petitioner outside ,n" out of his free will and consent taking into consideration the past good relations between "oun the Petitioner t whereas the Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent is the father-in-raw of the Petitioner and in both their interest and on the advice of elders and welr- wishers, the Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent amicabry settled alr issues between them by entering into a Memorandum of settlement dated

9.12.2024 arising out of the FIR Nq. 45g of 2023, dated lglo5l2023 and, the Charge Sheet SC No.46 of 2024 on the file of the Hon,ble II Additional Districl and Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, At: Medchal. ! ( OrP\ I I j i I { & : 1 I

4. Whereas, Petitioner as per the understanding of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 9.12.2024 retumed the articles belonging to 2"d , Respondents daughter and the 2nd Respondent Defacto Complainant acknowledged the receipt of the said arlicles given during the mariage ceremonv.

5. Whereas the 2nd Respondenl{Defacto Complainant without being under any threat or influence at his free volition and will agree that he has no objection to allow quash of the proceedings in FIR No. 458 of 2023 registered by Police, Pet-Basheerabad and SC No.46 of 2024 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, At: Medchal.

6. The Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent put their respective signatures hereto and do hereby state that they are entering into this joint memo of compromise on their own volition without being put to any sort of duress. Hence this Joint Memo Res entNo.2 \ Nr Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent No.2 Courtsel for the Pe Place: Hyderabad Dated: loll2l2024 HIGH COURT DATED:07 t01t2025 T COMMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2024 in / and CRLP.No.1S27B ot 2024 1rE sIAT 1 :) ll;\'.t 3: it,25 x C) t .'..ior.t cH ALLOWING THE CRLP AND l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2024 a v €