✦ High Court of India · 01 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 01 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
01 Aug 2025
Length
1,085 words

Counsel for the petitioners : Sri Arvind Kumar Agarwal Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,5 and 6 : Sri Gadi p Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2,3 and o , 3;tl: raveen I iumar Dy. itor Gen, Of I rdia r Land Acqrr sition The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH CONTEMPT CASE No.27L8 OF 2o24 ORDER Hcard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleadcr for I-and Acquisition appearing for the respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 5 and 6 and perused the enLire material on record

2. This Contempt Case is filed alleging wiilful and deliberate violation oI order dated 02.04.2O24 passed 1n W.P.No.8459 of 2024. \/ide the said order, this Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to dr:posit thc decretal amount in terms of the order and decree, dated 14.11.2022, passed in O.P.No123 of 1995 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.13.Nagar, to the credit of 8.P.No.227 of 2Ol4 in O.P.No.123 of 1995 on Lhe file of tht: I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, AS expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of four (04) months from the clate of receipt of copy of the said order. I 2

3. Learned Assistant Government Plead r r for Land Acquisition appearing lbr respondents would s .r :mit that the respondents have deposited an amount of R ;.7 1 ,60 ,603 l - tor.vards the enhanced compensation amount : ryable to the claimants in compliance to the order passed I ,rr this Court dated 02.04.2024 rn W.P.No.B459 of 2024 it t atisfaction of the order dated 24.06.2005 in O.P. No.123 o1 1995 passed by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga F eddv District at L.B.Nagar. On 21.O4.2025, rt:spondent No. dcposited a cheque bearing No.868387 for an amount of Ft .36.84, s08 / - drawn in favour of the r Additional Senior Civrl . h..rdge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar towards the final ck r retal charges in LAOP No.123 of 1995 and also deposited : rr amount Of Rs.34,91,636/- vidc cheque bearing No.8o ,37?,, dated

18.03.2025 towards the final decrete charS :s in LAOP No. i23 of 1995.

4. In view of the same, the cause in this Cr ntempt Case does not survir,e and this Courl deems it approp riate to close the contempt Case. Since, the dispute s regarding calculation of payments, the petitioner reques:ed to grant -tiberty to agitate the same before the appropriatr: l:rum.

5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate his grievance before the appropriate forum. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed. SD/- P.GOWRI SHANKAR PUTY REGISTR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER Two CCs to the GP for Land Acquisition, High Cou Telangana at Hyderabad.(OUT) One CC to Sri Arvind Kumar Agarwal, Advocate [O One CC to Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, Deputy Solicitor General of lndia [OPUC] Two CD Copies PU State of To, 1 2 4 ry. Sa/PSL HIGH COURT DATED: 0110812025 ORDER CC.No.2718 of 2024 \li ,{re / '.) o o a- '.tlQ /n,l ? :Y r )r: -:': SpqTC C)I * CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE \1 )q \',^ 't I I I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments