✦ High Court of India · 23 Dec 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Dec 2025
Length
1,488 words

8. Smt. E. Malleswari, Wo. Rama Rao, Aged about 45 years , Plot No. 267, Neeladri Towers, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

9. L.Tulasi Bqm, S/o Venkata Subbaiah, Aged about 48 years, Vedadri Towers, Nizampet Road, Hyderabad

10.D. Vimala Rani, Wo Vijaykumar, Aged about 43 years, R/o Flat No. 102, Jeevan apartments, Pragathi Nagr, Hyderabad

11.T. Sowjanya, Wo Praveen Kumar, Aged about 39 years, R/o H,No.T-S.3 Floor, Yanamalakundur, Vijayawada, Krishna District

12.T.Venkat Reddy, S/o Bat Reddy, Aged about 36 years, R/o H,No.32-345, HAL Colony, Qutbullapur, R.R.Dist

13. R.Visweswara Rao. S/o Rama Raa Aaaet or-.^..+ JawaharNagar, Moltati,'rff#5050:"' Aged about 66 vears, Plot. No.191, AND rs/

1. Janakampet Raiu. S/o Reddy Dist. H.No. 1-e0, Nafthur Vilase, jinniidniGijil-'sljrga _Narayana, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Business. Rl/o ' K5?:,3$?t:l$.1fll;'3hifl?liAnji Reddv, Ased about 46 vears, R/o H " i3[",1]'r]fi,:1{:R?"t#"t'Rg:'5,ni,ft%",:#:"* 50 vears, R/o Frat No. 403, . R;Yai:ir:1$xerg3*t:[",*l#?EJ3lliiJ""* about not known, R/o Frat t $;Y,*?l}}ISSi"?'rl i;y"i$?'f*"a, Ased about 48 vears, R/o Frat No. s02, Rao' Ased about 54 vears, Fuo

6. N.Vijaya Kumari. Wo Bhagvanarasar cbrony, ,Y331f[:to*|." Kumari, Ased about not known, R/o ' $[:3i:,,f,:[:?E:,"?'; d."yi,fJ8 t t ,, fO#l,fl,egi,5.!ffS"9Jflr?,.i1ryr? fl?:#bout 3;r?nil,?:5i,ltilflljllilif;i.fl;d%"il"ibout not known, Rr/o H No 27, Raju, s/o satyanarayana Raj, Aged about not known, R/o not known, Fuo H.No. 1_4_ X;Yu{}llijif6ma (Respondents 2 to 10 are not necessary in this CRp) 1 ... Respondents/ Respondents/Defendants Petition under Section 151 CPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay the operation and effect of the order dated 2g-10-2025 in r.A. No. 41012025 in o'S'No'264r2022 untir preriminary issue of res judicata is decided in the suit OS 264122 on the fite of the Additionat Senior Civit Judge, Sanga neaOl O"r.,rn disposal of the CRp. Counsel for the petitioners: SRI M.V.S.SARMA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G.PURUS n Petition under Article 22T of constitution of lndia against the order passed in 1.A.No.409 0f 2025 in oS.No.264 0t20220f dated 29.10.2025 0n the file of the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy. Between:

1. M.V.S.. Nagireddy,._ S/o Rama Mohan Reddy, Aged 60 years, R/o Janardhanapuram, Krishna District, A. p.

2. P. Krishna Mohan Reddy, S/o palla Reddy, Aged 48 years, R/o 502, Sita Towers, Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad.

3. 9-pt. M. .-Ve1u, Wo M. Ramesh, Age 46. years, R/3-171 Mayuri Nagar, Miyapur, Hyderabad-49.

4. P. J^eevani, Wo P. Ramalingeswara Rao, Aged about 42 years R/o Door No. 10/3, Pragathi Nagar, Hyderabad- 90.

5. M.Vidyadhar, S/o. SuryaNarayan Rao; Aged about 66 years, Mlcll-80, KPHB Colony, Hyderabad.

6. K..Surya.Prasad, S/o Subba Rao, Aged about 49 years, Mlcll-80, KPHB Colony, Hyderabad. Z. -C1r..9g!-"Ssh 90, KPHB., Colony, Hydearibad. Babu, S/o Satyanarayan Rao, Aged about 46 years, Fl/o MtG-il-

8. Smt. E.. Malleswari, Wo. Rama Rao, Aged about 45 years, plot No. 267, . Neeladri Towers, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. - Nizampet Road, Hyderabad.

9. LJulasi Ram, S/o Venkata.subbaiah, Aged about 48 years, Vedadri Towers, 10.D. Vimala Rani, W/o Vijaykumar, Aged about 43 yearc, R/o Flat No. 102, i Jeevan apartments, Pragathi Nagr, Hyderabad.

11.T. Sowjanya, Wo Praveen Kumar, Aged about 39 years, R/o H.No.T-S.3 Floor, Yanamalakundur, Vijayawada, Kishna District -

12.T.Venkat Redd.y, S/o Bal Reddy, Aged about 36 years, Rt/o H,No.32-345, HAL Colony, Qutbullapur, Rangareddy, District l3.R.Visweswara Bqo, S/o Rama Rao, Aged about 66 years, plot. No.191, Jawahar Nagar, Moulali, Hyderabad. n E Petitioners/Petitioners/Defendants.

1. Janakampet Raju, S/o Narayana, Aged about 3 lyears, Occ Business, Fl/o H.No. 1-90, NalthurVillage, Jinnaram Mandal. Sangia Reddy District.

2. M-Raja.Shekar.Reddy, S/oChinni Anji Reddy, Aged about 46 years, R/o H .No. 2-1351 47, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad.

3. Lekshmi Narayana, S/o Lingaiah, Aged about 50 years, Ri/o Flat No. 403, Vedadri Towers, Nizampet Road, Hyderabad.

4. D. Madhava Rao, c/o Lakshmi Narayana, Aged about not known, R/o Ftat No. 403, VedadriTowers, Nizampet Road, Hyderabad.

5. N.V.Krishn Rao, s/o s-rrya Narayana, Aged about 48 years, R/o Flat No. s02, Bhayanagar Colony, Hyderabad.

6. lrVijaya Kumari, W/o Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 54 years, R/o Bhagyanaragar Colony, Hyderabad

7. Ananda Lakshmi, c/o N. V'rjaya Kumari, Aged about not known, R/o Bhagyanaragar Colony, Hyderabad

8. K, chaitqlya Kumar, s/o sreenivas, Aged about not known, Rl/o H.No. 1-4- 190144, Flat No.26, Sainikpuri, Kapra, Hyderabad.

9. Q. pgnjeev Reddy, Wg D. Raji Reddy, Aged about not known, R/o H.No. 27, Gajularamaram, Qutbullapur Mandi, Hydeiabad

10.v.venkata Rama Raju, s/o Satyanarayana Raj, Aged about not known, R/o Kakinada, A.P. (Respondents 2 to 10 are not necessary in this CRp) lA NO: 1 OF 2025 ...Respondents/ Respondents/Defendants Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation and effect of the order dated 29- 10-2025 in l.A. No. 409/2025 in O.S. No. 26412022 until preliminary issue of res judicata is decided in the suit OS 264122 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Sanga Reddy, pending disposal of the CRP. t Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI M.V.S.SARMA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G.PURUSHOTHAM RAO The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER l HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA Dated: 23.12.2O25 Between M.V.S. Nagireddy and 12 others Janakampet Raju & 9 others AND .... Petitioners ... Respondents Between M.V.S. Nagireddy and 12 others Janakampet Raju & 9 others AND .... Petitioners ... Respondents Heard sri M.v.s. sarma, tearned counser appearing on behalf of the petitioners and sri G. Purushott-ra- Rao, learned counset appearing on behalf of the respondents. t

1. c.R.P. No.4244 of 2025 is filed to set aside the order dated 29.t0.2025 passed in I.A. No.410 of 2025 in o.S. No. \ \ I 2 SN, J cRP 4244 & 4273 2025 264 of 2022 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Sanga Reddy.

2. C.R.P. No.4273 of 2025 is filed to set aside the order dated 29.10.2025 passed in I.A' No.409 of 2025 in O.S. No. 264 of 2022 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Sanga Reddy. B 5 3 SN, J cRP 4244&4273 2025 Reddv. 4, (a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, (b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents upon consent and bringing the aforesaid submissions of both the learned counset on record, The present Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of by directing the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, at Sanga Reddy to dispose of the preliminary issue of res judicata raised by the petitioners herein, in I.A. No.41O of 2025 in O.S. No.264 oJ 2O22 and I.A. No.4O9 of 2025 in O.S. No.264 of 2O22 on the file of learned Additional Senior Civil Judge at Sanga Reddy, in accordance to law, within a period of five (5) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. t I I \ i \ \ 4 SN, J cRP 4244&4273 202s The parties herein are directed to maintain Sfafus Quo existing as on date pertaining to the subject suit schedule land in O.S. No.264 of 2022 on the file of learned Additional Senior Civil Judge at Sanga Reddy till the adjudication of the plea of res judicata put forth in the aforesaid r.As in o.s. No. 254 oJ 20.22 on the fire of Additional Senior Civi! Judge at Sanga Reddy. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous applications, if dfly, shall stand closed. SD/.N. CHANDRA SEKHAR PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S OFFTCER To,

1. The Additional Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy. 2. One CC to SRt M.V.S. SARMA, Advocate tOpUCI 3. one cc to sRr G.PURUSHOTHAM RAo, Advocate topucl 4. Two CD Copies NVB t. I l HIGH COURT DATED:2311212025 COMMON ORDER CRP.N os.4244 and 4273 of 2025 r.tET s T4 0 I JAN 202[ a- * () o * t ) DISPOSING THE BOTH CIUL REVISION PETITIONS 6 w \t 1 \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments