✦ High Court of India · 14 Nov 2025

1. Priyanka Vadithya v. Managing Director

Case Details High Court of India · 14 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
14 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,182 words

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the respondents '!+.: authorities in not conducting enquiry for vehicles inspect,on which is in proper condition with regard to the illegalities and irregularities committed with regard to awarding the Tender for Transportation of Bulk POL p'oducts MS HSD and Branded fuels by Road by HPCL Ghatkesar Terminal pursuant to the Tender notification dt. 4.6.2025 bearing No. 2500020541 HD-09050(5100020541) awarded to the 6th respondent inspite of the written complaints dt.31-10-2025, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutiona l, irraticnal and consequently direct the respondent authorities to inspect the vehicles with RTA authority by cancelling the tender notification d1.4.6.2025 No 2500020541 HD- 09050(5100020541 ) and to issue fresh tender notification lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the orcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m ty be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the tender nctification dt. 4.6.2025 bearing No.2500020541 HD- 09050(5100020541 )in so far es the respondent No. 6 tender concern pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: '1. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Rep_ by its Chairman and Managing Director, N.lvl. Joshi Marg, Lower parel (E) tr,4umbai-400 013. 2 The General Manager, (Procurement) Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Marathon Futrurex, 9th and 1Oth floor N.M. Josrti Marg, Lower parel (E) Mumbai-40O 013.

3. The Deputy General Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Co-poration Limited, Secunderabad POL Terminal P.B. No. 5, Ghatkesar, Ankushapur village, Hyderabad-SO1 301.

4. The Chief Manager, - lnstallation, Hindustan Petroleum rlorporation Limited, Secunderabad Terminal P.B. No. 5, Ghatkesar, Ankushapui village, Hyderabad-SO1 30'1 . ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.2 to 5 AND 1 2 Priyanka Vadithya, WO Srinu Pathlavath aged about 31 years, RIO S4Zl2B, Neeladrinagar, phase-1, lnjapur, Ranga Reddy District Jarupula Mansha, W/O Jarpula Ramulu, Aged abou: no.129. J.K.Colony, Kakatiya Nagar, Neredmet Ramakrishnapu.am, Hyderabad 27 yea$, near seed Rl/o PIot school, J Daravath Somla, S/o Daravathseva, aged about 43 years, Rt/o Rajuthanda, Chiwela Pandyanayak Thanda, Nalgonda Nalgonda district ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS 4. Union of lndia, rep. by its under Secretary, Ministry of Pelroleum and Natural Gas, Janpath Road, New Delhi.

5. Pathlavath Swathi, D/o Pathlavath keshva Aged 43 years. Occ- Business, Ro 1 5-1 -3281 121 1 I A Siddiamber bazar goshamahal, Hyderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the lnterim Order dated 11 .11.2025 passed in l.A.No.1 of 2O2S in W.P.No.33998 of 2025, and may also be pleased to dismiss the W.P.No.33998 of 2025 with exemplary costs. lA NO:3 OF 2025 Between: Pathlavath Swathi, D/o Pathlavath keshva Aged 43 years. Occ- Business, Rl/o 1 5-1 -3281 121 1 I A Siddiamber bazar goshamahal, Hyderabad, Telangana. ...PETITIONERYRESPONDENT No.6 AND 1 Priyanka Vadithya, W/O Srinu Pathlavath aged about 31 years, NO 547128, Neeladrinagar, phase-1, lnjapur, Ranga Reddy District

2. Jarupula Manisha, WO Jarpula Ramulu, Aged about 27 yea$, no.129, J.K.Colony, Kakatiya Nagar, Neredmet near seed Ra makrish na pu ra m, Hyderabad R/o Plot school,

3. Daravath Somla, S/o Daravathseva, aged about 43 years, Rl/o Rajuthanda, Chivvela Pandyanayak Thanda, Nalgonda Nalgonda district ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS 4. Union of lndia, rep. by its under Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Janpath Road, New Delhi.

5. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, N.M. Joshi Marg, Lower Parel (E) Mumbai-400 0'13. 6. The General Manager, (Procurement) Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Marathon Futrurex, 9th and 1Oth floor N.M. Joshi Marg, Lower Parel (E) Mumbai-400 0'13.

7. The Deputy General Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Secunderabad POL Terminal P.B. No. 5, Ghatkesar, Ankushapur village, Hyderabad-S0'l 301.

8. The Chief Manager, - lnstallation, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Secunderabad Terminal P.B. No. 5, Ghatkesar, Ankushapur village, Hyderabad-S0'l 301. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 to 5 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order issued in W.P.No. 33998 of 2025 dated 11-11-2025. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. SHIVAKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI N. BHUJANGA RAO, Deputy Solicitor General of lndia Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 5: SRI G. VIDYASAG,AR REP. OF SRI P. DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI K. DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: ORDER w To, 1 wp_33998_2025 NBK, J THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.33998 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; and learned Senior Counsel Mr. G. Vidyasagar, appearing on behalf of Mr. P. Durga Prasad, leamed counseI on record for the respondent-Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

2. Learncd counsel for the petitioner seeks pennission to withdraw the writ petition.

3. Permission granted.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- M. NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR a SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII '1 One CC to SRI R. SHIVAKUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI P. DURGA PRASAD, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI K. DURGA PRASAD, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI N. BHUJANGA RAO, Deputy Solicitor General of lndia Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies BN ! CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:1 111112025 1t SIAIE ) 4., (-) t 1t 'rr\ ?['nI i3, ii ' tr * Dar ) ..,j, ,.'/ ::.t..' ORDER WP.No.33998 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS J t\ \t \8

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments