The High Court · 2025

2. Sri.Venugopa!@ Musuluri Venugopal, S/o. Balachandra Rao Rao @ Musuluri Balachandra Rao, Age.29 Years, Occ . Pvt Employee, R/o. 129/C, Vengal Rao Nagar, Near SRNagar, Hyderabad Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceeding in CR.No.z03l2O23 of P.S. Cyber Crirne, Hyderabad- ...Respondents l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Sri Venugopal @ Musuluri Venugopal, S/o. Balachandra Rao Rao @ Musuluri Balachandra !ao, {ge 29 Years, Occ . Pvt Employee, R:/o. 129/C, Vengal Rao Nagar, NearSR Nagar, Hyderabad ...Respondent No 2 in l.A.No.2 &3 ot 2024 1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad AND ...Respondent / Complainant in l.A.No.2 & 3 of 2024

2. Ronak Bharath Kumar Kakkad, Sio. Bharath Ranchhoddas Kakkad, Age 32 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Plot No. 2X, Khandelwal' Society, Shanker Lane, Kandivali West, Hyderabad ...Petitioner / Accused No 1 in l.A.No. 2 &3 of 2O24 AND Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/Respondent No.2 to compromise the case in Cr. No.40312024 of P.S. Cyber Crime, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise of petitioner/respondent No. 2 and the Accused Persons in Cr. No 40312024 of P.S. Cyber Crime, Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Khaled Bin for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf Sayeed, Advocat€ of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri S A Rahman, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following Gommon Order : t' I t HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JIIWADI SRIDEVI I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.15381 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused No.1 to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No.403 of 2023 of Police Station Cyber Crime, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 66(C), 66(D) of I.T. Act and Sections 419 and 420 of IPC.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 19.12.2024, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretar5r, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court I I 2 for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the partir:s have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dirted 31.12.2024 and the same is placed on record.

5. In view of the above, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.l in Crime No.403 ctf 2023 of Police Station Cyber Crime, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shalI stand closed To, /TTRUE COPY// Sd/- N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / SECTION OFFICER

1. The Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad 2. The Station Horlse Officer, Cyber Crime PS, Hyderabad District 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court forthe State of Telangana' Hyderabad [OUT] Y

4. One CC to Sri Khaled Bin Sayeed, Advocate IOPUCI 5. One CC to Sri S A Rahman, Advocate tOpUCl 6. Two CD Copies Along with the Copy of the Joint Merno of Compromise VA I l .l 11' { HIGH COURT DATED:0810112025 , I COMMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2024 in / and CRLP.No.15381 ot 2024 1t{ E STI ,76 '/< rJ , 09,nll 2i,25 o * '!. i, 4 r{) ALLOWING THE CRLP AND l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2024 ,.tilb-. HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA- ERBAD I.A.No oF 2024 ( CRL.P.N IN IN oF 2024 . cr.No. 403 0F 2023 (Of P.S. Cyber Crime, Hyderabad) Between:-

1. Sri Venugopal @ Musuluri Venugopal,, Slo. Balachandra Rao Rao @ Musuluri Balachandra Rao, Age : 29 Years, Occ :.PVT Employee, R/o. : 729 /C, Vengal Rao Nagar, Near SR Nagar, Hyderabad.. AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court of Telarigana, , Hyderabad.

2. Roaak Bharath Kumar Kakkad, S/o. Rharafi\ Ranchhoddas Ka_kkad, Age : 32 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. Plot No. 2X, Khandelwal, So.ciety, Shalker l,ane, Kandivali West, Hyderabad ....Respondent No.2 ...Respondent/ Complainant ..Petitioner/Accused No. 1 I t7 OINT MEMO May it please vour Honour, It is sutrmitted that the Petitioner/ Respondent No'2 lodged a complaint 1. *ith th" policr: PS, Cyber Crime' Hyderabad basing on which a case in Cr' No' .403 / 2024was registered for 'ilte offence U / s' 66 (C)' 66 (D) fTA and Sec' 419'420 of IPC. the Res;pondents/ Accused No 1 The Pelitioner submit that during the pendency of the above cases' on the 2. intervention of elders and well wishers the nntter 'has been compromised between the I'etitioner/ Accused No-1 and the. !'espondent No'2 and -both caine to a conclusion to settle the matter and got clear the misunderstandings between the ResPondent Irlo.2 That. in view of the compromise' the Petitioner/Respondent No 2 does 3. not want to prot:eed with the crirrrinal case in Cr' No' {QQ*2023 of P'S' Cyber Crirne, Hyclerabad against the Accused No'1' l3 Therefore it is prayed that this Hon,ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner,/Respondent No.2 and the Respondents/Accused No.1 to compromise the case in CR. No. 403 / 2024 of p.S. Cyber Crime, Hyderabad and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon,ble court deems\ fit and proper in the circurnstances of tlre case. e- q-.r-y Signatures of Accused No.1 (.. Couru the A.No.1 HYDERABAD -'l'\7rzoz+' Signature of Respondent No.2. +r Jr lt' Counsel foi the Respondent No.2