✦ High Court of India · 10 Nov 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 10 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
10 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,303 words

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed by the 2nd respondent vide No. D2182612021 /Mugpal IPOB-26 on the application of the 9th respondents and passed an favourable order in colluded with the applicant and D2 /82612021 /Mugpal /POB-27 on the application of 8th respondent passed a favoured order and D2l826l2O21lMugpal IPOB -28 on the application of 7th respondent herein in Sy Nos. 586, total to an extent of Ac. 2.38 guntas and stop the illegal construction in Sy No. 586 total to an extent of 2.38 guntas situated at Baurgaon (P) Village, Mugpal Mandal, Nizamabad District by the unofficial respondents forthwith pending disposal of the main writ petition- lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 1 to appoint special investigation Team ( SIT )on the illegal transfer of Government Sikham Land ( Prohibited Land ) under 22-A registered Sy Nos- 586, total to an extent of Ac. 2.38 guntas and illegal mutations in Sy No. 586 total to an extent of 2.38 guntas situated at Baurgaon ( P) Village, Mugpal Mandal, Nizamabad District by the 2 to 4 and 20th respondents in favour of 7 to 9 respondents forthwith pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S . AMBEDKAR DUNNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 and 20: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: AGP FOR IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENI IGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.3392O OF 20, 5 ORDER: Heatd M r. Dunna Ambedkat, learncd l. , : nsel for the petitioner, Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assista n t Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent ics. I to .1, 20 ard Mr.Laxmalla Sandeep, learned Assistar L Government Pleader for Irrigation and Command Arei Devcloprnent appearing for respondent No.6.

2. A perusal ol the record sho'uvs that ,1r r proceeclings No.D2/ 82612021/Mugpal IPOB-26 is on11, 211 Ldministrative correspondence betrveen the revenue auth c r Lt_ies and no impugned order as such is enclosed in th is Writ pet ition. Accordingly, this Court does not see any mer-rt or ground to entertain this Writ Petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks oermission of this Court to withdraw the Writ petition granrir 1, liberty to file fresh Writ Petition. Learned counsel endorsed tlt r same on the bundle.

4. Permission is accorded. o

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed AS u,ithdrawn. The petitioner is granted liberty to file fresh Writ Petition if so required. There shall be no order as to costs lVirscellaneous petitions pending, if an1', shall stand closed -SD /.T. SRI SSISTA NIVASA REDD NT REGISTRA Y //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER One CC to M/s. Ambedkar Dunna Advocate [OP

1. Hvderabad [OUT]

2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue' High Court for the State of Telangana, at 3. Two CC to The GP for lrrig ation and Co mmand Area DeveloPment ' High Court for the State of Telan gana, at HYd erabad[OUTI l

4. Two CD CoPies TJ BS 4- I : l To, HIGH COURT DATED:1 011112025 ORDER WP.No.33920 of 2025 1t E SiA 2 1 [ifl ?Uf, ) t .,t C O -a ,^-'f^*) a.,--:?' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS '//ITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS !i\r. 3N"

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments