The High Court · 2025

Smt.Tasneem Begum, Wo Mohammed Farooq, Age. 37 Yrs, Occ. Housewife, Rl/o H. No. 1-8-1151119, Maclod Guda, kareem Compound, Secunderabad, Telangana. ...De-facto ComplainanURespondent No.2 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the C.C. No.6081 of 2024 bn the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, At. Hyderabad. (FlR No.71 of 2024 of W.P.S Begumpet, Hyderabad.) for the alleged offenses under sections 498-4 r/w 34 IPC and 4 of D.P Act. a l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Mohammed Farooq, S/o.Mohammed lshaque, Age. 35 Yrs, Occ. Private employee, Rl/o. H. No. 2-7-822111. Mukarampura, 11 Town, Karim Nagar District, Telangana. AND 1 The State of Telangana, Through S.H.O Women Police Station Begumpet, Hyderabad. Represented by its Public Prosecutor High Cou( of Telangana ...Petitioner/Accused No.1

2. Smt.Tasneem B Rl/o.H.No.'1-8-1 1 Telangana. egum, Wo.Mohammed Farooq, Age.3/ Yrs, Occ.Housewife, 5/1/9, Maclod Guda, Kareem Compou I , Secunderabad, ...Respondents ..Respondent No.3/[ -.-facto Complainant Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying thal n the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal pelition the High Court may be pleased to permit the complainant to compound the c f ence in the CC No. 6081 of 2024 on the file of the court of the XV Additior z I Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, in view of the compromise betw,: ,n the parties, in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 2OF 2O25: Smt Tasneem Begum, Wo.Mohammed Farooq, Age 3Z yrs Occ.Housewife, R/o.H.No.1-8-1 15/1/9, Maclod Guda, Kareem Compound lj :cunderabad, Telangana. ...Petitioner/l) r-facto Complainant AND 1 The State of_Telangana, Through S.H.O Women Police I tation Begumpet, Hyderabad. Represented by its Public Prosecutor High I turt of Telang'ana

2. Mohammed Farooq, S/o.Mohammed lshaque, Aqe employee, R/o.H.No.2-7-822l1 1, Mukarampura, 1 1 Toirn Telangana. ...Respondents ]5 Yrs, Occ.Private (arim Nagar District, ...Petil oner/Accused No.1 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that i the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition he High Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and to qua!;l the CC No.60g1 oi 2024 on the file of the court of the XV Additional.chief Metro olitan lv'lagistrate at Hyderabad, in view of the compromise between the partr : , in the interest of justice and pass such other. l.A. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that ir the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition. he High Court may be pleased to grant dispense of personal attendance C C I'o.6081 of 2024 on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, At -.i zderabad. (FlR No. 71 of 2O24 of W.P.S Begumpet, Hyderabad for the allec:d offenses under sections 498-4 r/w 34 IPC and 4 of D.p Act. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.6081 of 2024 on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, At Hyderabad. (FlR No.71 of 2024 of W.P.S Begumpet, Hyderabad.) for the alleged offenses under sections 498-A r/w 34 IPC 8. 4 of D.P Act, inDluding appearance pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition in the interest of iustice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ankit Kapoor, Advocate for the Petitioner Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Jittaboena Harish, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER l --.7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAhI3ANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI IS TIDEVI l.A.Nos.'1 and2 of 2025 ln/and CRI[/INAL PETITION No.'15173 of 2024 DATED: 11th DECEMBER 2025 Between: [Mohammed Farooq AND ..Petitioner The State of Telangana, Through S.H.O. Wr nen Police Station Begumpet, Hyderabad, Represented r r its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana and Anoth,rr ...Re ;pondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/ac:used No.'l to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.6081 of 2024 on the file of learned XV Additional Chief lrletropolitan l/ rgistrate at Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable un: -'r Sections 498,4 r/w 34 of IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appeari rg for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that durirrr pendency of the present Crimtnal Petition, the parties have c: npromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos l and 2 of 202{i have been filed to record the compromise between them and tr> compound the offences. { t I ^x! Z

3. Vide order dated 20.1 1.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 26.11.2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. ln view of the above, lA Nos..l and 2 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.1 in c.c.No.60g1 of 2024 on the file of learned XV Additionat Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. I Sd/- T. SRINIVASA REDDY AS STANT REGISTRAR a //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The XV Additional Chief Metropotitan 2. The Station House Officer, Woman p 3. Two CCs to the Public prosecutor, Hi Hyderabad. [OUT] Magistrate, at ampally, Hyderabad olice Station, Begumpet, Hyderabad gh Court for the state of Telangana, at. . . . Chb& I 7 .+. Otte Cc fu gtr anklt kapoor, Advocale [OptJCl ! jne_C_C ro Sri Jiuaboena Hrri"r,,'nOi".ii" iOlUCf 6. Two CD Copies Svs/PI( (Along rvith a copy of Joint Memo) Lrz J HIGH COURT DATED:1 111212025 r I I I COMMON ORDER l.A NOs. 1 and 2 of 2025 ln/and GRLP.No.15173 of 2024 I ) I JAit ,iii \ (.'\ o O t !'r P6,T ALLOWING THE CRLP AND l.A NO.1 AND 2 0F 2025 - -\]cz _,141* IN TFIE HIGH COURT FOR T}IE STATE OF TELANGANA ATFIYDERABAD Between: I.A. No. OF ZOZ5 IN CRL.P. No.@O F 2024 15113, Mohammed Farooq, S/o. Mohamme dlshff", Age: 35 Yrs, Occ: private employee, Rio. H. No. 2-7-822/11, Mukarampura, 1 I Town, Karim Nagar District, Tilangana. 1 The State ofTelangana Rep. by its Public prosecutor, High Cciurt Complex, High Court, at Hyderabad And 2 The Stbti-on House Officer, Police Station Begumpet, -Women Hyderabad. J Smt. Tasheem Begum, Wo Mohammed Faroog, Age: 37 yrs, Occ: Housewife, R/o H. No: l-B-ll5/l/9,Maclod Guda, Kareem Compound,. Secunderabad, Telangana. ... Petitioners /Accused No. 1 ...:..Respohdents ...Respondent No.3/De-facto Complainant May it please your lordship, JOINT MEMO I It'is submitted that the respondent no.3 humbly submits that she is the comprainant in cc No. 6081 of 2024 on the file of the court of the Hon'bre xv Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad and basing on the report given by her a crime has been registered against the accused and the same is pending trial and at present out of the difFerences arose with regard to certain family disputes a,,d after regishation of crime and pending trial, the disputes I between me and the accused are amicably settled and the matter has b r n compromised between us. Hence both the parties came to compromise in CC No. 60g1 of 202 I on the file of the Court of the Hon'ble XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hydera rad, and the parties have no claims or rights against each other in the future. As such present joir . memo is filed in lieu of the compromise arrived with the accused in the above criminal petition s :eking to quash. It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased r statement and to quash the C.C 6081 of 2024 on the file of the (t additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, in view of the compromise lrr interest of justice and pass such other order or orders may deern circumstances of the case. record the compromise :rt of the Hon'ble XV tween the parties, in the fit and proper in the Hence, this Joint Memo. Hyderabad DATE:06-ll-2025 I l l Co el for Petitioners Counsel for Respondent a\^X Sft 15' retitioner No 1 \etitipwrnh2 I :spondent No.3 I