The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the complaint vide . CC No. 918 of 2025 On the file of the Hon'ble Special Judicial Magistrate Of First Class Cum lV Addl. Junior Civtl Judge, At Karimnagar against the petitioner/ Accused No.1 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings in connection with complaint vide CC. No. 918 of 2025 On the file of the Hon'ble Special Judicial lMagistrate Of First Class Cum lV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, At Karimnagar againsl the petitioner/ Accused No- 1 pending disposal of the Crimina{ Petition and to pass such other orders or orders as this Hon'ble Cou( may deem fit and proper an the circumstances of this case. I I l I I v I This Petition comrng on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri GUNTI NARAHARI ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri. Jithender Rao Veeramalla the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.14529 OF 2025 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings against her in C.C.No.918 of 2025 on the file of learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum-lV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, registered for the offences under Sections 420 and 384 read with 34 r P.C.

2. Heard Sri Gunti Narahari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State. 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.2-de faclo complainant is the father-in-law of petitioner and that due to family disputes, a false case is foisted against the petitioner herein. He further submitted that one Domestic Violence Case and a case under Section 49BA LP.C. are pending and to settle the scores in these cases, the de facto complainant is bent upon foisting this false case against the petitioner herein. He, therefore, prayed to quash the proceedings in the present C.C. against the petitioner herein. .,/ I I I 2 ETD,] Crl.P.No.l4529 of2025

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submifted that the complaint discloses the dates of the alleged incidents and that the police could also collect the bank statements revealing the transfer of amounts to the account of petitioner. He therefore, prayed to dismiss the Criminal Petition.

5. Perused the record

6. Admittedly, respondent No.2-de facfo complainant and the petitioneraccused No.1 are related to each other. The de facto complainant is the father-in-law of the petitioner. The recitals of the charge sheet reveals that the de facto complainant has performed the marriage of the petitioner with his son-Manoj Kumar and thereafter, the petitioner herein joined the matrimonial home, but she did not allow the marriage to be consummated and she started demanding money declaring that she did not want to marry Manoj Kumar and that she married him only for the sake of money and that she has a boy friend with whom she is maintaining extra-marital relationship and that when she was denied money, she grew wild against the de facto complainant and his family members and broke three cell phones and further I threalened to implicate them in false criminal cases. Further, the / I \ 3 ETD,J Crl.P.No.l4529 of 2025 petitioner extorted amount and purchased a flat in Hyderabad on her name and threatened the de facfo complainant and his family members that she would drag them to Court and ultimately, she left the house of the de facto complainant by carrying away 31.5 tulas of gold and cash of Rs.24,00,000/-. After leaving the marital home, she has filed D.V.C.No.29 ot 2024 before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Hayathnagar, and dowry harassment case vlde Crime No.250 of 2Q24 of Hayathnagar Police Station. Thus, the allegations pima facie point out the offences under Sections 420 and 384 of l.P.C. against the petitioner herein. Admittedly, there are family disputes and cases have been foisted by the petitioner herein against lhe de facto complainant and the de facto complainant has filed the present case. The truth or otherwise in the allegations can be culled out only after a full- fledged trial. Therefore, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of the Criminal Petition by dispensing with the attendance of the petitioner herein before the trial Court.

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the attendance of the petitioner before the trial Court provided she is represented by a counsel before the trial Court on 4 crr.p.No. I as2e oF]oD2i every date of hearing and shafi appear before the triar court whenever her presence is required during the course of trial. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// S HAVANI SWAMY T REGIS OFFICER To,

1. The Special Judicial Magistrate Of First Class Cum lV Judge, at Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. d Junior Civil

2. The SHO LMD Colony Police Station, Karimnagar District. 3. One CC to SRl. GUNTI NARAHARI Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two Copies to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] PK/PSL

5. Two CD Copies w HIGH COURT DATED:2611112025 ORD6R CRLP.No.14529 of 2025 14 ,t. 2 4 JAll 2026 s r\ O ,, * Z '\ {,_) * CRIMINAL PEITITION IS DISPOSED OF DISPENSING WITH THE ATTENDANCE OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT. I rd^ &, I