High Court · 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 3 3722 0F 2025 Between: Pasula Ra1a Lingam, S/o Late pasula Anjarah, Occ. Agriculture, Aged about "-' 41 years. Rl/o. Khanapur Viilage, Gandipet'a uahoar, iaiga Reddy diiiri"t. ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 3 4 Il:_I{:. gl rgtrt g1rq, . Rep by its principar Secretary, uepartment, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Rangareddy, Rangareddy District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District The Tahsildar, Gandipeta Mandal, Rangareddy District. Revenue ...RESPONDENTS tition under Article 226 of theconstitution -of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction the action of the Respondent No.2 to 4 in not mutating the name of the petitioner in the revenue records i.e. in Bhu Bharathi digitat website by considering the Bhu Bharathi Applications Vide No. 2500024959 dated 22104t2025, with respect to land admeasuring to an extent Ac.1 .0000 gts in Sy. No. 290/4/6 (old Sy.No.290/4) situated at Khanapur viilage, Gandipeta Mandar, Rangareddy District, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and Violative of rights guaranteed under Art. 300A of the constitution of lndia apa( from violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider the Bhu Bharathi Application Vide No. 250oo249s9 dated 2210412025 of the petitioner and mutate ,l the petitioner name in revenue records and Bhu Bharatl- i Website and not to entertain any third party transactions over the petitioner sr-rtr.j :ct land. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMAVARAM CHANDRASI EKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOtl REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER )rl ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.33722 of 2O2S This Writ Petition, under Article ' 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seekrng the following relief "-.. fo issue a Wit, Order or direction more particularlg orrc in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or on!) other appropriate wit order or direction the action of the Respondent No.2 to 4 in not mutating the name of the petitioner in the reuenue records i.e- in Bhu Bharathi d-igitat uebsite bg consideing the Bhu Bha.rathi Applications Vide No.25OOO24959 dated 22/04/2O25' uith respect to land admeasuing to an extent Ac.1.OO gts in SA.No.290/ A/ 6 (old Sa.No.290/ A) situated at Khonapur Village, Gandipeta Mandal, Rangareddy Distict, is itlegal, arbitrory, unjust and Violatiue of rtghts guaranteed under Aft. 3OOA of the Constitution of India opaft from uiolation of pinciples of natural justice and consequentlg direct the respondents to consider ttvz Bhu Bharathi Apptication Vide No.250O024959' dated 22/ 04/ 2025 of the petitioner and mutate the petitioner nctme in reuenue records and Bhu Bharathi Website and not to entertain any third parlg transactions ouer the petitioner subject land... "

2. Heard Sri Ramavaram Chandrashekar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri L' Ravinder, \ learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for the Page 2 of5 respondents and with the consent of both thr parties, this u.rit petition is disposed of at the admission s1-trt ;e itself. 3 , Learned counsel appearing for the pe : tion er r.r,ouid submit that originalll, the father of the petilic ner by name late Pasula Anjaiah is the absolute owner alJ possessor of land to an extent of Ac. 1.23 guntas in Sy.No.2('0/A, Ac. 1.10 guntas in Sy.No.6/U/AA (old Sy.No.6/U), Ac. 26 guntas in Si,.No.7, Acs.3.34 guntas ir-r Sy.No.B/A/AA (ot t S1,.No.8/A), total admeasuring Acs.8.13 guntas, situated rt l(hanapur Village, Gandipeta Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distri :t, having old Pattedar Passbook No.186191 and Patta No.1 r-rd Title Deed No.215367 issued by the revenue authorities When the third parties were trying to interfere with th < lar-ld of the father of the petitioner, they filed O.S.No.56l <t 2022 on tl're file of the learned Additional Junior Civil J rdge, Ranga Reddy District for perpetual iqjunction against the defendants therein and the same was decree I in favour of the father of the petitioner by granting IC perpetual injunction uide decree dated 23.02.2006. !--. .lrEli#t!Br.,. ==r{ y Page 3 of5

4. The father of the petitioner has sold Ac.O.21 guntas out of total extent of Ac.l.23 guntas in Sy.No.29O/A, situated at Khanpur Village, Galdipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District by executing a registered sale deed bearing document No.6296 of 2OO5, dated 18.06.2005 in favour of P.Narasimha and 5 others and the father of the petitioner has left with the larld to an extent of Ac. 1.02 guntas in Sy.No.29O/A. After the demise of the father of the petitioner in the year 2OL2, the petitioner has been granted patta passbook uide No.TO507OO20 126 but out of Ac.1.O2 guntas only Ac.O.O2 guntas was entered in the petitioner's patta passbook. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has submitted offline application dated 3O.06.2022 to respondent No.4 and online application uide No.23OO 131 128 in Dharani Portal. But the respondent-authorities have not acted upon it. Later on, the petitioner has submitted one other Application in Dharani PortaJ. uide Application No.230013 1 132, dated 21.Oa.2O23. The same was also not considered. Recently, the petitioner made arr application in Bhu-Bharati Portal uide Applicatiort l t, I I I Page 4 of5 No.2500O24959, dated 22.O4.2025 for correcti:.r in pattedar pasbook of the petitioner. Despite receiving t re same, the respondent ;rlLthoritles have not actcd upon r i Hence, the present wril petrhon

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleadi:r lor Revenue r,vould submit that the respondent-authorittt'l u'ill consider the application submitted by the petitiont r and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

6. In the light of the aforeszrid facts and cir -- rmstances of the case and upon perusing the materia-l availiL ,le on record, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing tlrt respondent atrthorities to consider thc Application N c . 25OOO24959 , datcd 22.04.2O25 submitted by the petitiont r, strictll' 1n accordance lr,ith law by putting the petitioner:r d a1l affected parties on notice and affording them an oI i ,ortunity. lf respondent-authorities are not inclined to accelt the request made by the petitioner, they shall pass an o - ler assigning specific reasons and communicate copy of tLLr saicl order to the petitioner. They shall complete the sai: exerci,qe .as Page 5 oi5 expeditiously as possible and as per the procedure laid down under la\\,. There shall be no order as to costs As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand dismissed. SD/- A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER ,TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. The District Collector, Rangaretiidy, Rangareddy District.

2. ,

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District. 4. The Tahsildar, Gandipeta Mandal, Rangareddy District. 5. One CC to SRI RAMAVARAM CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, Advocate IoPUCI

6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies BSR TKS cN- HIGH COURT DATED: 0711112025 ; ( HES t4I 6 D.) \lt \\o- 'r\ * \r' r( a 7I2 q t \,"rA Pc! Iz ,) ORDER WP.No.33722 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS s.",v