Mr. Salman Mohsin Salam v. HARI PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ ). ! SECTION OFFICER
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
A,:cordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed by
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. A,:cordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed by reserving the liberty to the petitioner to file an appro priate petition along rn.ith th e relevant docket orders. No costs. lnterkrcutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand ciosed *--- //TRUE COPY// Sd/- V. HARI…
Judgment
Cause title
Mr. Salman Mohsin Salam, S/o. Ahmed Abdulla Mohsin Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No. 8-2-602/25, Zehra Nagar Road, Road No.10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-SO0 034. ...Respondent
/ Respondent. IA NO: 7 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition., the High Court may be pleased to direct the Judge, Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad to dispose of the F.C.O.P. No. 599 of 2022 within time frame preferably in two months pending disposal of the above C.R.P. Counsel for the Petitioner:
Sri Anupriya Counsel for the Respondent: - - The Court made the following: ORDER 7 THE IION'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL CIVIL REVISION PETI TION No.386a of 2o24
ORDER:
M s. .A.nupriya Sethi, learned counsel for the petitioner pressed lbr the following reliet- "For these and such other grounds will be urged at the tine of hearing that t-his Hon'ble Court may be plearied to allow tt e ().R.P. by directing the Learned Judge, Family Court, City C vi1 Court, at Hyderabad to expedite the Trial in F.C.().P.No.599 of 2022 forthwith and pass such other order or oI ders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ht and proper in ci:cunrstances of the case. "
Tlris Court, on more than one occasion, requested the learned oourrsel for the petitioner to file the docket rrrders so that the Court can gather as to what is the reason for deliry. Sadly, the learned (:ourrsel for the petitioner is reluctant and n()t ready to frle them. lhus, I find no reason to entertain this civil revision petitiorr.
Operative part
A,:cordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed by reserving the liberty to the petitioner to file an appro priate petition along rn.ith th e relevant docket orders. No costs. lnterkrcutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand ciosed *--- //TRUE COPY// Sd/- V. HARI PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ ). ! SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 __:==a The Judge, Fanrity Court, City Civil Co-ut l-Iyderabad O"" CCi. S'l Arrupriya, Advocate IOPUCI Trvo CD Copies ?A_ *.d,*l --.&.-*d ,d I I r 't HE S l4 ( Ro* o o f,t AI)i ?|,75 ( ( .,/ C l sEr) F HIGHCOURT DATED:14/02/Zt 2s ORDER CRP.No.3868 of 202.1 Dismissing the C.R.p. ivith, rut costs qA j1 \2., 7 i.tilli;
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: A,:cordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed by
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.