High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of Ihe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in not taking any action ...RESPONDENTS and not registering FIR inspite of the petitioner represent.l on dated 24-B-2O16 under the provisions of Land Grabbing Act in respect o illegal grabbing of Government road admeasuring 60 sq.yards in survey \o.124 situated at Gopanpally village, Serilingmpalli mandal, Rangareddy Dist-i :t and trials of illegal construction works by blocking the road and disturbing the ,l )neral public ingress and egress as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also against tlrr provisions of Land Grabbing Act 1982 and the provisions of lndian Penal Co j : and consequential directions to the respondents to cause the arrest of the p rrsons mentioned in petitioner complaint daled 24-8-2016 by registering FIR agz i rst them and protect the publrc property i.e., Government road admeasuring 6( sq.yards in survey No.124 situated at Gopanpally village, Serilingamaplli r andal, Rangareddy District immediately. l.A. NO: 1OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 36897 OF 2016) Petition under Seclion 151 CPC praying that in the ( ,rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High (l )urt may be pleased to direct the respondents to cause the arrest of the p:-sons mentioned in petitioner complaint dated 24-8-2016 by registering FIR a9e i rst [hem and protect the public property i.e., Government road admeasuring 6( sq.yards in survey No.124 s jtuated at Gopanpally village, Serilingamaplli I andal, Rangareddy District immediately pending disposal of the above writ petit ( n and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHAMMED ASLAM (Nor pi:sENr) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: SRI M.SRINIVAS, rl 3P FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.8 & 9: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.10: SRI GODUGU MALLES llAM, REp. FOR SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN RET DY, SC FOR GHMC The Cou( made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.29818 oF 2016 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief: ,.-..foissueanorder,directionorawritparticuladyoneinthenatureof iiii-of *anOamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in not taking any action ani n6t registering FIR in.spite of the petitioner 'iirir"ntLtion dated 24-8-2Ud underlhe provisions of Land Grabbing Act in respect or ittegat irinting of Govemmen.t road admeasuring 60 yr,* in survey N7'til situa"ted at Gopanpatty viltage' Serilingmpalli iiiaii i"ngr,"day District and triats of iltegal construction works by "q "road uid di"tu'bi'g the general public ingress and egress, oi"iis the as ittegal, arbitrary, ,iii"'t an'O ab6 against the provisions of Land Penal code and Crioiing Ad 1gb2 uii tn" provrsloris of ioisiqientiat dkectioni to the respondents 1o cauge the arrest of the ientioned in petitioner complain.t, dated 24-8-2016 bv ;;;til -rigirt"rng FtR againtst ihem and protect the public propedy i'e'' No 124 srtuated. Government roaa aaiiaiuring 60 sq yards in ?uN:y ii eopanpatty village,- Seritiigamaptii mandal' Rangareddy District immediatelY and lo Pass. " 2 None for the Petitioner. ,tndian 3 Heard lvlr.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No 1 to 5 and Mr'Godugu Mallesham, learned counsel representing tr4r'GMadhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent No.10.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, based on the representation submitted by the petitioner dated

24.08.2016,CrimeNo.313of2016wasregistered.ltiSfurther submitted that the allegations in the said complaint disclosed the 2 commission of a non-cognizable offence, and h:rce, the police sought appropriate directions from the jurisdict r,nal Magistrate under Section 155(2) of the Code of Criminal Frrcedure, 1973. Pursuant to such permission, the matter was duly ir vestigated, and after completion of the investigation, a final rep,:1was filed on 31 .122016, classifying the case as "lack of t>ri(sn6g." Thus contends that the grievance raised in the pres: nt writ petition stands effectively redressed, and therefore, r,othing further survives for adjudication

5. I have perused the material placed on record

6. The grievance of the petitioner, as urged in t re writ petition, was that his representation dated 24.08.2016 had tot been acted upon by the concerned police authorities. Hovv, rver, from the submissions of the learned Assistant Government I leader and the record now placed before this Court, it is ev dent that the petitioner's representation was duly considered, () ime No.313 of 2016 was registered, the investigation was compltred, and a final report was filed classifying the mafter as "lack of evir lence."

7. ln light of the above factual position, it is clear that the petitioner's grrevance has been effectively addre ssed, and no further direction is warranted from this Court. J S.Accordingly,thisWritPetitionisdismissedasinfructuous There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI SISTANT REGISTRA ON OFFICER One CC to SRI II/OHAI\/MED ASLAIV, Advocate I One CC to SRI G IVADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHIVC [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOIVE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies To, 1 2 3 4 5 BSR w HIGH COURT NTRJ DATED: 1511012025 ORDER WP.No.29818 of 2016 ( o THE S l/, 16 |{l\8 2m )( t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS ,Jb