High Court · 2025

6. B.P. Samson, S/o. Sri B.R.Prabhu Dass, Age 42 years, occ Service, R/o. H.No. 1-9-19lLQlB-141F-2, TRT Quarters, Ramnagar, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, Telangana State 500 020.

7. Sri B.D. Nelson, S/o. late B.R.Devadas, Age 43 years, OccPrivate Employee, H.No. 1-9-1918618115lF-4, TRT Quarters, Ramnagar, Opp.Sowmya Hospital, Hyderabad,500 020. B. J. Sulochana, W/o. late B.R.Deva Das, Age 69 years, Occ Retd. Employee, Rl/o H.No. 1-9-19/86/8i15lF-4, Ramnagar, Opp. Sownya Hospital, TRT Quarters, Hyderabad-500 020.

9. B.D. Robinson, S/o. late B.R Devadas, Aged 41 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. H.No. 1-9-19/BOlBllSlF-4, Ramnagar, Opp. Sowmya Hospital, TRT Quarters, Hyderabad-500 020. .RESPONDENTS -7 Petition unde Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a y'y'rit Order more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF IVANDAI/US declaring the inaction of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to stop the construction of the building at H. Nos. 1-9- 19/LQ/814/F1, 1-9-19/LQlF2 and 1-9- 19197, Ramnagar-, Hyderabad, with Sanction Plan Permit No 5B39/GHtt4CISEC|2024-BP in file No.012945/GHMC/6367/SEC212023-BP, which is going on wrth deviations against the Sanction Plan as confirmed by the Honourable Chief JLrdge, Small Causes Court, Hyderabad orders dated 1 7-10- 2025 in MA No.103/2024, as illegal and in violation of Municipal Rules and Public Policy and consequently direct the Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 to take necessary action to remove tht: deviations committed by the Respondent Nos. 4 to rD1 before allowing them to proceed with the construction, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stop the construct on work of the building in H. Nos. 1-9-19/LQ/814lF1, 1-9- '19/LQ/F2 & 1-9-19/97 Ramnagar, Hyderabad with Permit No.5839/GHMClSECI2024-BP, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.DAMODAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for Respondent No.2&3 : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC Counsel forthe Respondent No.4to9: SRI V.V.PURNACHANOER The Court made the following: ORDER I I HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33454 OF 2025 ORDER:(ORAL) Heard Mr. T. Damodar, learned counsel for the petitroner; Mr G Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3; and Mr. V.V. Purnachander, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 9, and perused the material available on record

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.3 is not acting upon the order passed by the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad, in M.A.No.'|03 of 2024, dated 17 .10.2025, whereby the speaking order dated 02.09.2024 passed by respondent No.3 herein was set aside and direction was issued to issue fresh show cause notice with regard to the deviations as noted down by the Advocate Commissioner's report dated 08.09.2025 within two months from the date of the judgment

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that show cause notice has not been issued pursuant to the order of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad. Taking advantage of the same, respondent Nos.4 to t have again started making unauthorised construction. I I i I I l w

4. Such contention is disputed by the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3, and he stated that as of now, there is no construction activity undertaken by respondent Nos.4 to 9. Further, the learned Standing Counsel furnished a copy of the show cause notice dated 03.11.2025 issued to respondent Nos.4 to 9 and it is submitted that enquiry will be conducted in compliance of the order dated

17.10.2025 in M.A.No.103 of 2024 passed by the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad.

5. Recordirg the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to comply with the order dated 17.10.2025 in M.A.No.103 of 2024 passed by the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad, and complete the enquiry pursuant to the show cause notice dated 03.11.2025 within the time frame fixed in M.A.No.103 of 2024. Pending such enquiry, respondent No.3 is directed not to permit respondent Nos.4 to 9 to construct building in deviation of the sanction plan. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed- SD/.T.SRINIVAS REDDY REGISTRAR AQS ,TRUE COPY/i ON OFFICER To,

1. The The Princroal Secretary, Municipal Administratio , Telangana Secretariat, \ 2 Hyderabad. The Commissirner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, , C.C.Complerx. Tank Bund Roab Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad-SO0 o63 tr/

3. fhe uepury Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad tt/unicipal Corporation, Circle No.15,6th Floor, J.N.Road, Abids, Hyderabad-S0O 001.

4. One CC to SRI T.DAMODAR, Advocate. IOPUCI 5. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADIUN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT]

6. One CC to SRI G.X/ADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHIUC. [OPUC] 7. One CC to SRI V.V.PURNACHANDER, Advocate. IOPUC] 8. Two CD Copies. BSK \ * HlGH COI.JRT DATED:0411112025 , CC TODAY H'. ,,*ro,,zrzi H./ '.-; :' .\ ,, - , I ORDER WP.No.3345,l of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT C CSTS t)