The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Appellant SRI K.HARIMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: None Appeared Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI KATTA LAXMI PRASAD The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY M.A.C.M.A No. 247A of 2018 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel appearing for the appellant reported that the matter has been referred to the Lok Adalat constituted by the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, for settlement. After due deliberations, the Lok Adalat passed an award on 13.09.2025, as per the terms agreed upon by the parties. Tire original award dated l3.og.2o2s is filed before this Court and. the same is taken on record.

2. Accordingly, this appeai is disposed of in terms of the award dated 13.09.2025 by the Lok Adalat. Penrling miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD'. T. SRINIVASA REDD\ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/' SECTION OFFICER To, W l.TheChairmanMotorAccidentClaimsTribunal.cum-ChiefJudge,CityCivil Court, HYderabad.

2. One C:C to SRI K.HARIMOHAN REDDY Advocate IOPUC]

3. One CC to SRI KOTTA LAXMI PRASAD, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two OD CoPies (Along with copy of award Passed by Lok Adalat enclosed herewith) lil:: iJgr ffi-.rc HIGH COI.'RT DATED:2511012025 HES 1/ 'i i-:' ,) 2 5 r[8 202[ k s * JUDGMENT MACMA.No.2478 of 2018 DISPOSED OF IN TERMS OF AWARD PASSED BY 3 t( b v r\ /,-, BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [under section 19 of the Legat services Authorities Act, 19g7 (centralAct)] SE8 HIGH COURT LOK AOALAT L'(5 '.c I t' -# 7t Date: 13-09- 2A25 resent:1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi, P (Former Judge, Hon,ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M.A. No.2478 of 2018 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST (On the fite of the X Addi tional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad) o P o.1162 13 BETWEEN: V.Susheeta, W/o.Late-Rama Satya prasad, Aged: 55 years, occupation : Housewife, R/o. House No.11 -lq-q3, pfot No.g, Road No.5, Haripuri Colony, Saroornagar, Hydera6ad. AND 1. Raju Reddy Reddygari, S/o.Tirupathi Reddy, Aged : Major, Occupation : Business, R/o-H.No-143, Tatetma, Andote Mandat, Medak District. ...Appellant

2. lclcl Lombard Genera[ lnsurance Company Limited, Represented by its Manager, Presentty at llnd floor, Shop No.1 to7 & 1g to 20, Lumbini Jewel Ma[t, Road No.2, Banjara Hitts, Hyderabad, Tetangana 500034. ....Respondents Counse[ for Appettant/ petitioner Counset for Respondent No.2/ lnsurance Company Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Hari Mohan Reddy, Advocate : Sri Katta Laxmi prasad, Advocate/ Ms. Katta Sravya, Advocate : SriMohammed Abdut Shabeer, Senior Manager-Legat Ctaims. This appeal having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counset for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: AWARD Compensation Awarded by the Tribunal Rs.6,18,870/- (Rupeei Six lakhs eighteen thousand eight hundred and seventy onty) with proportionate costs and interest at l% per annum from the date of petition tit[ reatization. I r agg Ctaimant/Peti This is an appeal fited bv the order passed by the X Additionat Chief Judge, Citv civit Court, Hyderabad in OP No.1162 of 2013. Sri Mohammed Abdu[ Shabeer, Senior Manager-Legal Ctaims for the Respondent No.2-lnsurance Company and Appettant/Ctairn1p1,, Petitioner atong with his counse[ have appeared and identified before the Lok Adatat. The Appettant/Claimant is duty identifieO with her Aadhar Card and photograph and her signature was atso attested by her counset. During ttre pendency of this Appeat, th.e Appettant/Claimant/Petitioner aid Respondent No.2-lns-urance Company have mutuatty entered into a compromise and settted the matter. ln pursuancc of the setttement, the Appettant/Ctaimant/Petitioner has agreed to receive an amount of Rs.3,00,000/-(Rupees Three [akhs onty) towards futt and finat setttement apart from the amount atready deposited and the lnsurance Company has agreed to pay the same towards futl and final setttement of the claim. Accordingty, compromise is recorded and the Award is passed before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the above said. setttement, the lnsurance Company shatl pay the above said amount within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Award. ln the event of defautt or detay in making'such depo:sit, the Appettant/Petitioner/ Ctaimant is entitted for interest @ 7% per annum as awarded by the Tribunal from the date of defautt. : I It ComPensa ti0n Awarded (Settl,ement Reached) in the Lok Adatat. SER H'GH COURT tOK ADALAT z ol4'v t t Apportionment of Compensation, if anY Additional Direction (s):

1. The Appettant is entitted to the refund of Court Fee paid in this appeat. 2. The amount already deposited by the lnsurance Company if any, sha[[ be given credit to. 3. Soon after dep<lsit by the lnsurance Company, the Appettant/Ctaimant/petitioner is permitted to withdraw the entire amount. ln token of consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their counset have signed this ara,ard in our presence. ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, this case stands disposed of. BA \ 4 Appellant (s) it) Respondent (s) - coEt 8R. cr\,, iEF \,ALI c t.14.17 hs6 fo.4*a\l q8.tt sbs3lag Counse! for Appellant (s) Counsel for Res ndent s \.t'o' Cha SER ( Member HIGH COURT LOK 1-{,l * .i:.,, a * ot1 (Seal of mmittee)