Manemma v. The State of Telangana, rept. by its Principal Secretary, Flnance and Planning
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Having regard to the above made submissi,)lls and for the reasons alike in the order dated 03.09.2025 passerl oy tl-re Division Bench in W.P..\o.23 138 of 2025, this Writ Petitio:r is drsposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the entire amount payable to…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or directron or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declare the impugned action of the respondents in not releasing and paying the retirement benefits i.e. Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs. 1,27,1721- with Token No.2522473641 dt21-O8-2O24, Gratuity (CS) amount of Rs. 14,72,8281-wilh Token No. 2522473649 dt.21-O8'2024 and EL and HPL amount of Rs. 8,75,9041 with Token No. 2522471833 d1.2110812024 is illegal, arbitrary, unfair, unjust, discrimination, apart from violation of all the Statutory Rules and Constitutional provisions and consequently direct the respondents to release and pay above mentioned benefits to the petitioner with interest @ 24% per annum from date of retirement to till the date of actual payment is made. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the cii'r:tr m sta nces stated in the affidavit filed in srpport of the petition, the High Court ma\ be pleased to direct the respondents forthwith to release and pay the retirerr ent Benefits of the petitioner such as, i.e. Gratuity (TS) amount' of Rs. 1 ,.?-,',1721- with Token No.2522473641 dt.?1-08-2024, Gratuity (CS) amount of l.:'. 14,72.8281 with Token No. 2522473(;49 dt.21-08-2024 and EL and HPL amo, rrrt of Rs. 8,75,904/- with Token No.2522471833 d1.2110812024 pending disposal cf main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. P UGENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: GP FOR SERVICES lll Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.33423 OF 2025
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is hled aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in releasing retiral bcnefits to the petitioner,
Heard Sri P.Ugender Reddy, learned counsei for the petitioner; learned Government Pleader for Services-ill for respondent Nos.1 to 4; and learned Govcrnment Pleader for Services-l for respondent No.S. With their consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the lis raised in the present Writ Petition has already been adjudicated by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.23 138 of 2025, q,hich was disposed of uide order dated O3.O9.2O25, and thus prayed to pass similar order in the present Writ Petition also.
The above made submission is not seriously disputed by the other side. t I t- 2
Having regard to the above made submissi,)lls and for the reasons alike in the order dated 03.09.2025 passerl oy tl-re Division Bench in W.P..\o.23 138 of 2025, this Writ Petitio:r is drsposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the entire amount payable to the petitioner be released forthwith within a p:: iod of srx (06) weeks from to clay, faiiing which, the entire amourt with regard to retiral benefits shall carq, interest at the rate of 1l)oh per arlnum from the date the amount fell due till it is actualiv pc id. Miscellaneous petitions, if ar-ry, pending in r,-r.s V,/rit Petition shali stand closed. There shall be no order as to c.sts. \ SD/. MOHD.ISMAIL I}EPUTY REGISTRAR \-_-,-- " SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
The principar secretary, Finance and pranning Departnr:rnt Secretariat, state , +*"llxtll;I11"73,?fs; and Accou nts' Gove rn me n t ;1 rer a n s an a' I *ff$sl,*}*m-, l'***r ;" : re ansana a. l?u"-t", to GP FoR sEVlcES l' High court for the Stzrte or relansana' , l?11, ""0'., ?p- MMT PVL HIGH COURT DATED:0411112025 C,C T.ODAY ORDER WP.No.33423 of 2025 l'l'. t'.,',j I -/:: ..'/.. i:. 10 ti0\J 206 lc--. ta: " \r, I .']r i!y' * ..,/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITON WITHOUT COSTS rA ffir,-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.