The High Court · 2025

Judgment

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Department of M.A and U.D., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. 2 2 4 5 The Director Municipal Administration, A,/C Guards, Hydqrabad. The District Collector & District Magistrate, Nizamabad District, Nizamabad. The Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Nizamabad, Nizambad District. T.he Swasakthi Mahila S_angam, Rep. by its Coordinator, Vinayak Nagar, Nizamabad, Nizambad District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the r

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ, Order or direction more pa(icularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th and 5th Respondent herein constructing the swasakthi Mahila Sangam Bhavanam situated at Banjara Basti, Road No.7, Vinayak Nagar, Nizamabad Municipal corporation, Nizambad District is high illegal, arbltrary, unjust and biased and violation of Articles 14 and 21 constitution of lndia and against the Principle of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to allow the proposed construction of Swasakthi Mahila Sangam Bhavanam situated at Banjara Basti, Road lJ r.7, Vinayak Nagar, Nizamabad Municipal Corporation, Nizambad District. l.A. NO: 2OF 2014(WPMP. NO:12304OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Cour may be pleased stay all further proceedings in constructing the Swasakthi Mah I r Sangam Bhavanam situated at Banlara Basti, Road No.7, Vinayak Nagar, Jizamabad Municipal Corporation, Nizambad District, pending disposal the Writ Pe ition. I.A. NO: 1OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 12303 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r:i cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High ( ourt may be pleased direct the Advocate Commissioner to verify the Public Il rad encroachment in construction the Swasakthi fvlahila Sangam Bhavanam sit r lted at Banjara Basti, Road No.7, Vinayak Nagar, Nizamabad Municipal Corpora:i rn, Nizambad District, pending disposal the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI JOGRAM TEJAVAT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'l and 2: GP FOR MUNCI ,AL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELC PMENT Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SC FOR MUNICIPALIT) Counsel for the Respondent No.5: -- WRIT PETITION NO: 9112 OF 2014 Betureen: B.Lalsing Nayak, S/o: Thukaram Naik, Government Service, FUo H.No.1-13-218, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. aged irl out 48 years, Occ. Banjara 3 usti, Vinayak Nagar. AND 1 2 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretar , Department of M.A and U.D., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. The Director Municipal Administration, A/C Guards, Hy lerabad. ...PETITIONER

3. The District Collector & District Magistrate, Nizamabad District, Nizamabad. 4. The Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Nizamabad, Nizambad District. 5. The Swasakthi Mahila Sangam, Rep. by its Coordinator, Vinayak Nagar, Nizamabad, Nizambad District. (W.P. stand dismissed for default as against R5 for non compliance of C.O. dt: 11-4-20171 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the action of the 4th and sth Respondent herein constructing the Swasakthi Mahila Sangam Bhavanam situated at Banjara Basti, Road No.7, Vinayak Nagar, Nizamabad Municipal Corporation, Nizambad District is high illegal, arbitrary, unjust and biased and violation of Articles 14 and 21 Constitution of lndia and against the Principle of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to allow the proposed construction of Swasakthi Mahila Sangam Bhavanam situated at Banjara Basti, Road No.7, Vinayak Nagar, Nizamabad Municipal Corporation, Nizambad District. l.A. NO: 1OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 11383 OF 20141 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated iri the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in constructing the Swasakthi Mahila Sangam Bhavanam situated at Baniara Basti, Road No.7, Vinayak Nagar, Nizamabad Municipal Corporation, Nizamabad District, pending disposal the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI JOGRAM TEJAVAT Counsel fortheRespondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SC FOR MC KAR, NIZ The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA AI ISHETTY WRIT PETITION Nos.981 8 and 9112 of a oL4 COMMON ORDER: These writ petitions are f11ed seeking the followjr g substaltive reliefs: WRIT PETITION No.9818 of 2OL4 "...lssue a Writ Order or direction more particti) in the nature of Writ of Maldamus declaring tf of the 4th alrd Sth Respondent herein constn- t Swasakthi Mahila Sangam Bhavanam sit: Banjara Basti Road No 7 Vinayak Nagar Ni: Municipal Corporation Nizambad District is h.1 arbitrary unjust and biased ald violation of Ar and 21 Constitution of India and against the P-: natural justice a,nd consequently direct the re:i1 not to allow the proposed construction of li Mahila Sangam Bhavaram situated at Banj z Road No 7 Vinayak Nagar Nizamabad \ Corporation Nizambad District and pass..." rly one : action tlng the rted at amabad h illegal icles 14 rciple of ondents rasakthi -a Basti unicipal WRIT PETITION No.9112 of 2Ol4 "...to issue a Writ Order or direction morc pl one in the naLure of Writ of Mandamus declr action of the action of the 4th and 5t]1 R: herein constructing the Swasakthi Ma-I1ile Bhavanam situatecl at Banjara Basti Road No ? Nagar Nizamabad Municipal Corporation I ticulariy ring the ,pondent Sangam Vinayak izambad ( I \ 2 District is high illegal arbitrary unjust and biased and violation of Articles 14 and 2l Constitution of India and against the Principle of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to allow tJe proposed construction of Swasakthi Mahila Sangam Bhavanam situated at Banj ara Basti Road No 7 Vinayak Nagar Nizamabad Municipal Corporation Nizambad District... "

3. Sri Jogram Tejavat, learned counsel for the petitioner present.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit tha[ cause in the writ petitions does not survive for adjudication and the writ petitions have become infructuous.

5. Recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs'

6. Pending miscellaleous applications, if any, shall stald closed' //rRUE COPY// SO/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSTSTANT REGTSTRAR (q SECnb( oFFIcER Hyderabad[OUT]

1. One CC to Sri Jogram Tejavat, Advocate [OPUC] 2. fwo CC to The GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at 3. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration Urban Development, High Court 4. One CC to SC for Municipality [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] To, TJ BS HIGH COURT DATED:1 210912025 COMMON ORDER WP.No.9818 and 9112 of 2014 I a5 ca t/l t \, * ,l 2 JAll 2026 z() stATCtr' , DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS AIJ INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS ? '\3