The High Court · 2025

29. Pramod Reddy, S/o Late Srinivas Reddy, Age 42 yea,s, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 1 1 -1 -'1 90'1 i8l1, Gangasathan, Nizarirabad Proler and District

30.Srujan Reddy, S/o Late Ganga Reddy, Age 35 years, Occ; Business, R/o. H.No.'1 1-'1 -1901!812, Gangasathan, Nizamabad Prdper and District. 31 Nishanth, lS/o. Late Sudharshan Reddy, Age 32 years, Ccc Business, Rl/o. 11- 1-'|.901 l&l3, Gangasathan, Nizamabad Proper arid Dist.ict. 32 Narender R-eddi1, Q/o Venkat Narsimha Reddy, Age 4iZ years, Occ Business, Rio. 'l'1-1-'1901/8, Gangasathan, Nizamabad Pioper and -District.

33.Devidas Rao, S/o. Venkat Rao, Age 61 years, Occ l)rivate employee, R/o. H No.1-121114, RTC Colony, Manik Bandar, Makloc,r tr/lan,Cal, Ni2amabad District. 34 Nalla Mohan Reddy, S/o. Late Raja Reddy, Age 55 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. H.No.7-30, Komanpally Village, Sarangaplr MZndal j Karimnag;ar District. AND

1. The State r:f Telangana, Represented by its principal Secretary to the Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildihgs, Hydeiabarl. 2. The District Collector, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar., - 3. The Sub Collector,Jagtial Division,Jagtial,Karimnagar Dist., - ...PETITIONERS ll,,;+ffi r' /'

4. The Tahsildar, Sarangapur Mandal, Sarangapur, Karimnagar District. 5. The Special Deputy Collector, Rehabilitation Unit-1, Sriramsaqar proiect (Pochampad Project), Pochampad, Nizamabad Diitrict. ,.,RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents authorities in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from their house site plots each 0-10 cents in plot nos. 572,573,544,545,546,547,363, 364, 383, 384, 365, 366, 532, 533, 534, 535, 538, 539, 540, 541 ,550, 551, 637, 638, 639, 640, 641 ,642,645, 646, 647,648,649,650, 651,652, 653, 654,655, 656, 391, 392, 393,394,395,396,397,398,379 and 380, in sy.no.35, in Donthapur rehabilitation centre of sarangapur Mandal of Jagtial Division of Karimnagar District, without assigning reasons, high handedly and illegally abusing the powers vested in them, is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia. consequenfly, direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from their house site plots each 0-10 cents in plot nos. 572,573,544,545,546,547,363, 364, 383, 384, 365, 366, 532, 533, 534, 535, 538, 539, 540, 541, 550, 55.1, 637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653, 654, 655, 656, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395,396,397,398, 379 and 380, in sy.no.35, in Donthapur rehabititation centre of Sarangapur Mandal of Jagtial Division of Karimnagar District. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 37006 OF 20161 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Janardhan Reddy and others from their house site plots each 0-10 cents in Sarangapur Mandal of Jagtial Division of 364, 393, 384, 365, 366, 532, 533, 534, 535, 651, 652, 653, 654, 655, 656, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 379 and 380, in sy.no.35, in Donthapur rehabilitation centre of order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. FILED oN: 1-9-2016 respondents not to dispossess the petitioners plot nos. s7z, -iEa;ar_.-:lry ' :-':E ' 4' .a' ./ 573,544,545,546,547, 363, 538, 539, 540,541 ,550, 5111, 637" 63S, 639, 640, 641, 642, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, Karimnagar Distric: Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondents: ASST.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR ORDER W.P. No.299O3 of 2016 Questioning the action of the respondents in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from their house site plots each 0.10 cents in Plots No.572, 573, 544,545, 546, 547,363,364, 383, 384, 365, 366, 532,533, 534, s35, s38, 539, s40, 54 1, 550, s51, 637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653, t t 654, 655, 656, 39I, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 379 and 380 ir-r Sy.No.35 in Donthapur rehabilitation centre of Sarangapur Mandal of Jagtial Division of Karimnagar District, without assigning reasons' petitioners liled the present writ petition with a consequential prayer to direct the respondents not to drspossess the peti[ioners frorn their respective plots. It is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue that counter has been filed, inter alia, stating that the respondents never interlered with the subject property of this writ petition and if so required, the respondents will follow due process of law and recording the same, this writ petition may be disposed of Since the matter is of the year 2016 and no interim orders were granted earlier and recording the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the respondents never interfered with the subject properB/ and wi[[ not interfere with the subject property without following due process of law, this writ petition is l To, 2 disposed of accordingly. Flowever, it is . rnrrde clear that the responde.ls shall follow due proccss of law beforc initiati,g zLny action on the subjcct propcrty. There shall be no order as to ccsts. As a sequel, miscellaneous applicationsr, if any pending, shall stanrl ckrsed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. A.SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGIFTRAR ., secrr{r{6Krrcen I ll - Utate ot I etangana, Hyderabad. 1 Ill".ll'lg,qqlsgglutg,rvJo the Revenue Department, S:crerariat Buitdings, 2. The Distrir:t Collector, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar , _ 3. The Sub Collector,Jagtial Division,Jagtial, Karimnagar t)ist., _ 4. The Tahsildar, Sarangapur Mandal, Sarangapur, Karinrnagar Drstrict. 5. Tf'e Special 2eputy Collector, Rehabilitation Unit-1, Sriramsaoar proiect (r-ochampad project), pochampad, Nizamabad District 6. One CC tc SRt K.VENUMADHAV, Advocate. tOpUCI 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Stirte of Telangana. B. Two CD Ccpies. BSK PSK f\- R HIGH COURT DATED:1010712025 '' c .'ifz.- c)? k :) J 1E StP 2C6 ( ''.( *i.r- .D \ -'l',2'- .:- ,-'- ORDER WP.No.29903 of 2016 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS U- \g