Hyderabad High Court · 2025

2. Sri. Padavala Srinivas Rao, S/o. Padavala Occ Artisan Garde -ll, R/o.H.No.4-35-197 a Kukatpally, Hyderabad Anjaiah, Aged About 52 Years, rnd 198, Venkateshwara Nagar, ...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the proceedings in PRC.No.250 of 2024 on the file of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad for the offence under section 341, 333, 506 RA/U. 34 IPC against petitioner/accused No.2 as the same is untenable either on facts or under law. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant STAY of all further proceedings in PRC.No.250 ot 2025 on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad for the offence under section 341,'333, 506 RAIV. 34 IPC against petitioner/accused No.2, pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition it the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 2 OF 20?5 Between: sri. Padavala Srinivaq Rao, S/o. padavala_Anjaiah, Aged About 52 years, occ Artisan Garde -il, R/o.H.No.4-35-197 and 198, Venkite5nwara r,ligii, kllitparry, Hyderabad PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND The state of relangana,. Thror.rgh public prosecutor, High court of Judicature at Hyderabad for th6 Staie ortejang"ana, UyOeri6i [ . fuiugtp_tam, s/o. R. Vittar Rao, Aged 37 years, occ: pvt. service, R/o. H.No.6-1-274, otd crB euarters, opp Mroie-suirei rvi"rr"i r_"ng, kiijir"t;bil: Hyderabad. 2 ... RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER Petition under section 359 (6) of the BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High C-ourt may b9 pleased to permit the petitioner to compound the offences under Sections 341 , 333, 506 r/w. 34 IPC in PRC. No .2SOt2O2i on the fite of the I Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate Nampally, Hyderabad respondent No. 2/Accused No. 2 -"gainst l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: sri. Padavala srinrvaq.Rao, s/o. padavallAnjaiah, Aged About 52 years, occ Artisan Garde -il, R/o.H.No.4-35-197;nd iga, V"n'rilieEn*ar. Nig-;, k-ulatparry, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND 1' The State of Telangqr.a,.Throrrgh Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Tdtangana, HyOLriOal' '

2. [..fu1u9[o_tqm,, S/o. R. Vittar Rao, Aged 37 years, occ: pvt. service, R/o. H.No.6-1-274, Otd ctB Quarters, oip [troiJsu6J'iliair"t r_"n;, KHialbad, HYderabad I I- .-'-'- --rY! I'rsr .. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER Petition under Section 359 (2) of the BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of bririinil petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the Compromise and Quash the proceedings in PRC.No.25012025 on the file of the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Nampally, Hyderabad for the offences Sections 341, 333, 506 r/w. 34 IPC against the respondent No.2/Accused No.2 This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri Sridhar Lonkala, Advocate for the Petitioner in Crl.Petition and Respondent No. 2 in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 in Crl.Petition and in l.A. Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 and of Sri Yadaiah Boddupally, Advocate for the Respondent no.2 in Crl,Pbtition and Petitioner in l.A.nos.2 and 3 ot 2025. The Gourt made the following: ORDER ir') THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and N IN coMMoN oBDlg: This criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.2 under section 528 of BNSS, 2o23seeking to quash the proceedings against him in P.R.c.No.250 of 2o2s on the file of the learned I Additional chief Metroporitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, registered for the alleged offences punishable under sections 341 333 and 506 riw. 34 of the lndian penal Code, 1g60.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as respondent No.2-de facto complainant that during the pendency of the present criminal petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingty, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2o2s have been filed seeking permission to compound the offences, record the compromise and quash the proceedings in the above P.R.C. respectively.

3. The learned Additionar public prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavit fired by respondent No.2 in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 which discrose that he has willingly consented for 2 ETD, J crlp_14294 _2025 compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide order dated 04.11.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 17.11.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in P.R.C.No.25O of 2025 on the file of the learned I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampalty, Hyderabad, registered against the petitioner-accused No.2 are hereby quashed, subject to the petitioner-accused No.2 paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Onty) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services t6 <r, 3 i;TD, J crlp _l 4 294 __2025 Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana. Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.l'Jo.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Br:nch (20070), IFSC Code:SB1N0020070, MICR No.500004057), within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- P.C.SULEKHA DEVI T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/ d0ron oFFrcER To

1. The I Additional chief Judiciat Magistrate Nampaily, Hyderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, Khairatabad Police Station, Hyderabad City. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to SRl. Sridhar Lonkata, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRl.Yadaiah Boddupally, Advocate [OpUC] 6. Two CD Copies Enclosing a copy of joint memo of compromise Pr/PSL Note: Total Amount of Rs. 1o,oo0/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only )has been paid by Sri Sridhar Lonkala, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 21.11.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 140830 of 2O2S and dated OS-12- 2025. w HIGH COURT DATED i2411112025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos. 2 AND 3 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.N o.14294 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE CRL.PETITION AND I.A'S "".fu HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Crl.P.No. 1qr4\or 2025 Between: R. Purushotam, S/o. R. Vittal Rao, Aged 37 years, Occ: Pvt. Service, R/o.H.No. 6-L-27 4, Old CIB Quarters, Opp More Super Market Lane, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. AND ...PETrTrON ER/ACCUSED NO. 2 1

2. THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. Sri. Padavala Srinivas Rao, S/o. padavata Anjaiah, Aged About 52 Years, Occ: Artisan Garde -II, R/o.H.No.4-35-197 & 198, Venl<ateshwara Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ... RE!}PON D ENTS/D EFACTTJ COM PLAI NAN]: : -' . , : May it please your Lordghip, ,,.;i i 1.'r The Respondent No.2 had lodged a complaint against the Accused No,1 and petitioner/accused No.2 before the Police Station, Khair:atabad. Thle PS, Khairatabad had regist6red a crime with FIR No.13/2024ragainst, the Accused No.1 and Petitioner/Accusg( No.Z for the. offences under., Sections 341,333,506 r/w 34 IPC. The Police after investigbtion;nua file; ' charge'sheet and the same is numbered as bRC.No.250/2025 on thJfile of the Hon'ble I Additional chief tletropolitan Magistrate Nampallyl; Hyderabad. It is relevant to submit that pending the above pRC ''itn,oo.i,'u " , ,, : The court ,

2. bro.,ther i.e, accused No.1 died on 03.09.2025, due to ill health. below on 15.,10.2025 has abated the case,against Accused No.1. :: i

3. The Petitioner and Respondent No.2 herein, subsequently, after intervention of elders and well wishers of both the parties, have settled the ement, .the In view of the said settl amicably and unconditionally. :. " :.,.,_1.: '; l'. . i..il . K .?) ,(. v,ffi Y ff/ \ respondent No.2 herein has agreed to withdraw the above case pending before the Hon'bre court against the petitioner by firing . uorroor,;,. 4' The Petitioner and respondent No.2 submits that in view of the above settlement, the Respondent No.2 had agreed to withdraw the above pRC which is filed by him against Petitioner. Therefore, the pending case before the Hon'ble court present is liable to be euashed. " 5. That in view of the above compromise, this Hon,bre court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in pRC.No.2so/2o2s on the fire of the Hon'ble I Additionar chief Metroporitan Magistrate Nampaily, Hyderabad for the offences sections 341, 333, 506 r/w 34Ipc against petitioner/accused No.2. Therefore in view of the above amicabre setflement, this Hon,bre court n'':ay be proaseci to euash the proceedings in pRC.No .z5o/2025 on the Hon'bre I Additionar chief Metroporitan Magistrate Ntampqily, ::u,.t,,u.ot Hyderabad for the offences Sections 341, 333, 506 r/w f4lpc again$ t;; Petitioner/Accused No.2 in the circumst:ances of the case and in the interest of justice. Hence the loint Memo. PLACE: HYDERABAD DATE: L6.10.202 I;. COUN ACCUSED NO.2 FOR PETTTIONER/ Vda'ln'(, I NSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.2 , COU PETITION USED No.2 L€FJ NO. PTU