✦ High Court of India · 06 Nov 2025

The Fishermen Cooperative Society, Gumdal v. Sathnuri Yadaiah

Case Details High Court of India · 06 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
06 Nov 2025
Length
1,151 words

5. Boyini Srinivas, S/o Venkataraln, Age 37, Occ. Fishermen R/o H.No. 1-15611, Gumdal Doma Mandal, Vikarabad Distr, Telangana 509335.

6. Sathnuri Venkatesh, S/o Chenniah, Age 22, Occ. Fishermen Ryo H.No. 1- 105/1 , Gumdal Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana 509335. 7. Boini Tharun, Sio Balakrishna, Age 22, Occ Fishermen, R/o H.No. 1-95/1, Gumdal Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana - 509335. 8. Sathunuri Maipal, S/o Beemaiah, Age 31 , Occ Fishermen, R/o H.No. 1-30/1, Gumdal Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana - 509335.

9. Thogapuram Harish, S/o Narsimulu, Age 26, Occ Fishermen R|/o H.No. 1- 155/1, Gumdal Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana 509335. l0.Thogapuram Naresh, S/o Narasimulu, Age 33, Occ Fishermen Rl/o H.No. '1- 155/1 , Gumdal Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana 509335. I 1 . Boini Venu, S/o Venkataiah, Age 21, Occ Fishermen Flr I H No. 1-94, Gumdal Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana -:193:i5.

12.Boini Ramesh, Sio Dasthaiah, Age 3'1 , Occ. Fish: men H.No. 1-10111, Gumdal Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telr r gana - 509335.

13. Boini Balaraju, S/o Chennaiah , Age 41, Occ Fishern e r Rt/o H.No. 1-11111, Gumdal Village, Doma [trlandal, Vikarabad District, Telz r gana - 509335. 14 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secret: I I Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development and Fisheries Department, S: .retariat, Hyderabad, Telangana. 1 5. The Commissioner of Hyderabad, Telangana. Fisheries, Shanthi Nagar t) >lony, Masab Tank,

16.The District Collector, Vikarabad District, Vikarabad, Tel, ngana.

17.The District Cooperative Officer, Vikarabad District, Vik; abad, Telangana. 18. The Assistant Director of Fisheries/ District Fisher e ; Officer. Vikarabad District, Telangana. RESPONDENTS lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c . umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Coui may be pteased to suspend the order dated 1411012025 in W.P.No. 30150 of 2 ) 15, pending disposal of the main Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Appellant : SRI D.L.PANDU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1to13 : SRI CH.SAWASI t HAN Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.14,15&18 : GP FOR ANlMl.L HUSBANDRy Counsel forthe Respondent No.16 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.17 : GP FOR COOPERATIO,,I The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.1217 OF 2o25 Mr. D L. Pandu, learncd counscl appcarrng li)r thc apl.llanr Mr. Ch. Satyasadan, learrred counscl appearnlg for thc respondcnt Nos.t to I3 JUDGMENT: (Pcr Honble .Justicc Ilouijhumr Bhattachar\ a)

1. The Writ Appeal arises out of an order dated 14.10.2O25 passed by a learned Single.Iudge in Writ Pctition No.3Ol5O of

2. The respondent Nos. 1 to 13 herein (writ petitioners) hlcd the Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondcnt No.5/thc Assistant Director oI FisheriesT/District Fisherics Officer, Vikarabad District (the respondent No. 18 he rein) to incorporate the names ol the writ petitioners into the Members List o[ the respondcnt No.6/ the Fishermen Cooperativc Socieq,, Gumdal (the appellant herein).

3. By the impugned order dated 14. IO.2025, the learncd Single Judge disposed of the Writ Petition by directing thc respondent .No.5 to proceed with conducting of skill test and admitting the writ I \ I I 2 pctltioncrs as members of the respon(l(, 1 No.6 (Lhe al)i)cllant/Socictl') in accordance r,,'ith thc pr.r r Lsror.rs oI rltc 1r:Jangala Oooltcr:rtivc Societics Act, 1964 irnrl I t. r-rlcs tl:rrle tht:reundcr. 'lhc process n'as to l;e completccl r,,,jr I n trr,,ct monlits lrom thc datc of rr:c:cipt of a copy of thc impuened o- lcr.

1. Lcarncd ('ollnsel appearing for the appcll:; r I sul)mits lhat tlrc impugncd ordcr was pas'sed ex patle t.e. , wiLll ) I t hearing ( lre appcllar-rt/Socie11. Counsel places several ciocLrmcr:L; to sho\,.. Llt:ll llrc u,rit petirioncrs cannoL be admitted iis tn.nbers oi tltc ayr pcllant/ Socie tr,. .',. We have herrrd learned counsel for the app,.linl ;rs u.cll its le lrrnccl counscl appcaring for tl.rc r-csponclertr \i : i tt 13,,ri rit Pt:til i6n615.

6. Cor-rsidering the fact that thc impugned ordcr ,.;1s passed r:x parte and the appcllant/ Society did not have an r .lporlunity to vcn tilate its gricvance, we deem it appropri:rtc r r: remancl t he m.rtter to lhe lcarned Single Judge for a hearirrll , I the parr ics beforc addressing the grievance of the writ petitjonc.r i I t \ 3 7 . We mzkc it clear that we havc not delved into the merits of the casc. Wc also note that thc praver in the Writ Petition is incorrcctly framcd and the s rit pctitioners may not even bc entitled to any rclief based on the pral'er in the Writ Petition (as it appears in Page No.27 of the Writ Appeal papers).

8. W.A.No.12 17 of 2025 is allowed and disposed ol b,v.. setting aside the impugned order dated 14.lO.2025 All connected applications stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/.B.SA JOIN GISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 1 . The Principal Secretary, Animal HusQandry, Dairy Development and Oepartment, Secretariit, Telangana State, Hyderabad, Telangana' 2. The Commissioner of Fisheries, Shanthi Nagar Colony, lr/asab Tank' Hyderabad, Telangana. Fisheries

3. The District Collector, Vikarabad District, Vikarabad, Telangana' 4. The District cooperative Officer, Vikarabad District, Vikarabad, Telangana' 5. The Assistant Director of Fisheries/ District Fisheries officer, Vikarabad District, Telangana.

6. One CC to SRI D.L.PANDU, Advocate. [OPUC] 7. One CC to SRI CH.SAWASADHAN, Advocate lOPUCl B.TwoCCstoGPFoRANlMALHUSBANDRY,HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana at HYderabad. [OUT]

9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] l0.TwoCCstoGPFoRCooPERATloN,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] l.l.TheSectionofficer,PostingSection,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana' Hyderabad.

12. The Section officer, writ Non-service section, High court for the state of Telangana, HYderabad.

13. Two CD CoPies. To, I HIGH COURT DATED:0611112025 ,4 ,( 2 II Nliu W z -P { JUDGMENT WA.No.1217 of 2025 ALLOWING THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS &D tl irr

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments