The High Court · 2025

2. Smt. Ayoneeja Sharma. Wo Navaneeth Kumar, Age.30 " ars, Occ Dentist, R/o Flat No. 415, Solitarr Abode, Chandanagar, Serilrngar pally RR Dist N/o lt/ uza ffa rpu r. B ihar State. ...Respc r dents/Complainants Petition under Seclron 528 of BNSS praying that in the circ:t r r:;ta nces sta ted in the lMemorandum of Grounds of Cnmrnal Petrtion. the High Court nr:r, the proceedings against the Pelrtroners/Accused no.1 to 6 in C( the file of lAddl Junior Civil Judge-Cum-lX Addl. Judicial lvlagis r De pleased to Quash No 1345 of 2023 on rte of First Class, RR District at Kukatpally for the alleged offences U/ss 498,4 lPC, ano of D.P.Act l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Between Smt. Ayoneeja Sharnta, Wo Navaneeth Kumar, Age.30 \,ir. rs, Occ. Dentist, Rio Flat No 415, Solrtair Abode, Chandanagar, SerilingarrJ tlly, RR Dist. N/o Muzaffarpur, Bihar State. ...Petitic r erl2nd Respondent AND

1. The State of Telangana. rep. By its Public prosecutor, Hrgi Oourt of Tela0gana Hyderabad. Resl) )nde nUCompla ina nt

2. Navaneeth kumar, S/o Late Lalith kumar, age.31 yrs Flat.no.4'15, Solitaire abode, Sridevi Theatre, besrc t Chandanagar, Serilingampally, N/o Gariba post paroo, lV r state A-1

3. Manju Sharma, W/o Late Lalith kumar, age. 66 yrs, () Flat.no.415, Solitaire abode, Sridevi Theatre, besrce Chandanagar, Serilingampally, N/o Gariba post paroo, lVr state. A-2

4. Ragini @ Ragini Sharma, Wo Kundan kumar, age. 50 yrs, Patahi Rup, Pakahi Khas, Muzafarpoor dist, Bihar state. A- l 5. Kumud @ R. Kumud Sharma, W/o Sharma, age. 40 yrs, Selvavinayagar colony, thiruthangal, Virudhunagar, Tamiln:rr Occ. Software, Rio Bachpan School zafarpoor drst, Bihar <;. House wife, R/o Bachpan School. rafarpoor dist, Bihar lcc. Housewife, R/o )cc. Housewife, R/o u-626130. A-4

6. Nidhi @ Nidhi Devi, Wo Chandan kumar, age.42 yrs, Occ.House wife, R/o Patahi Rup, Pakahi Khas, IViuizafarpoor dist, Bihar state. A-5

7. Kundan @ Kundan Kumar, S/o Rayeshwar Thakur, Age.51, Occ Business R/o Patahi Rup, Pakahi Khas, Muzafarpoor dist, Bihar state. 4-6 Petitioners No 3. to 7 are Rep by therr GPA holder, Navaneeth Kumar S/o Late Lalrth Kumar. Aged about 3.1 years, Occ Software Employee, Rio Flat No 415. Sollitaire Abode. Sridevi Theater, Beside Bachpan School, Chanda Nagar, Serlingampally lvlandal, R.R.District ...Respondents/Accused No. 1to 6 Petition under Section 359 (6) r/w 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petttion, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petrtioner/2nd Respondent defaclo complainant to compound the offence and quash the crime registered against the respondent/ petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 6 under section 498-,4 and 4 of C.P . Act in CC No. 1 345 of 2O23 on the file of I Addl Junior Civil Judge-Cum-lX Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class, RR District at Kukatpally. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petitron under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\rlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings and permit the Petitioner/2nd Respondent to compromise the case in CC No.1345 of 2023 oo the file of I Addl Junior Civil Judge-Cum-lx Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class, RR District at Kukatpally, against the respo nden UAccused No 1 to 6. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/accused no'l to appear on behalf of respondenl no3 to 7/accused no.2 to 6 in crlp 14584 ot 2025 This Petition coming on for hearing. upon perusing the l\iletnc-andum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Mr. lvl 5 narnath, hdvocate for the Petitioners and the lVlr. Jrthender Rao Veeramalla Addition,t Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Responcient No 1 and of lt4rs. D. Pallavi, Advocab f ,r the Respondent No.

2. The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I.A.Nos. I and 2 of 2o25 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.14584 of 2025 Date:22.12.2025 Between: Navaneeth Kumar and ll,c others Pet itioners/Accused Nos. I to 6 AND The Statc of 1'elangana representcd b), its Public Prosecutor, and anothcr ...Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has bccn filed by the petitioners/ accuscd Nos.1 to 6 seeking to quash thc proccedrngs in C.C. No.1345 of 2023 on the llle of rhc I Additional Jtrnior Civil Judge curn-IX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First CIass, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpallv.

2. Heard Mr.M.Amarnath, learned coultsel for the petitioners, Mrs.D.Pallavi, lcarned counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr.Jithende r Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor; appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the well wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the disputes i 2 pending bet,,r'een them and entcrcd illto comprc,r. se and filed .loir-rt Memo. Accordrngh,,, the partics havc filed I.A.N,r , 1 ancl ?, of ')O25 secking permrssion to compolrnd the oflenccs ; nd t,o rt:r:ord thc compromise respectively.

4. This Court uide order, datccl 09.12.2025, : lectcd ttrc part ics i.e., the petirioners and respondent No.2, to apDl rr br:fore rhc Fligh Court Legal Scrvices Comrnittce , H],dcrabad, cr 1T.12.2025. In compliance ol the said ordcr, Lhc Sr:crctzrry, LIigh t- rurl I-ega I Servict-s Committee, has submitted report, dated 17.12.')0. :,, stating that thc petitioner No- 1, r,r,ho is a (icnr:ral Pon'cr of 1, irrr.e1, F{oldcr for pctitioner Nos.2 to 6, and respondent No.2 u'crc < r.rly ident ilicd rvith copies of therr Aadhar Cards. It is furthcr stated t I 2 t the parties have willfully and u,ithout an1, cocrcion cnterc(l into cor, romise. 5 In vie'n' of the said report and also in vie..r rl the conrpromise entered betq'een the petrtior-rers and responclent ) : .2 trs vvell as tht: submissions rnade by the rcspcctivc parties, [.A. f l s;. I and 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the proceedrngs in O ( . No.1345 of 2023 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Juc113,: c:unr IX Aclditional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy tli: .r-ict at Kukatpally, are hereby quashed against the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowc<1 ;ubjcct to pii).ment of costs of Rs.1O,O00/- (Rupees Lcn thousand onl lo rhe High Court t.' 3 Legal Services CommitLee, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioncrs, on or beforc 31.12.2025. Miscellaneous applications, pencling il any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. V. HARI PRASA DEPU TY REGIS R SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The I Additional Junior Civil Judge'Cum-lX Additional J cial l/agistrate of First Class, RR District. at Kukatpally.

2. The X Additional IMetropolitan lt/lagistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally. 3. The Station House Officer, Chandanagar Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate

4. One CC to lvlr. M Amarnath, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies /M DL Note: Total Amount of Rs 15,000/ ( Rupees Fifteen thousand only ) has been paid by It/r. IVI Amarnath, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 22.12.2025 as Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the "the High Court Legal Services Commrttee, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 13712 of 2026 dated 05.02.2026. HIGH COURT DATED: 221121202s COMMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 1 and 2 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14584 OF 2025 ,.J * RTHES tA 7 I f .l 20?6 (o l,r:r.=lur ;:- -1 ;.1-;)J, * ALLOWING THE l.A. Nos. 2 AND 3 OF 2026 AND CRIMINAL PETITION q +1 \q "y F 8 MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL PETITION (filed under section 359(6) r/w 528 of BNSS) IN THE COURT OF HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA I.A.No 2025 1n Crl. P.No. of 2025 Between: Smt. Ayoneeja Sharma W/o Navaneeth Kumar, Age: 30 Years, Occ: Dentist, R/o Flat No: 4lS,Solitair Abode, Chandanagar,Serilingampally, RR Dist N/o. Muzaffarpur, Bihar State. Petitioner/ 2na Respondent And

1. The State of Telangana. Through pS pSchandanagar rep. By its Public prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. ... Respondent/Complainant 2)Navaneethkumar S/o Late Lalithkumar, age. 311,rs, Occ. Software,R/o Flat.no.4 1 5, Solitaire abode, Sridevi Theatre, besideBachpan school, Chandanagar, Serilingampally, N/o Gariba post paroo, Muzafarpoordist, Bihar state, 3) Manju Sharma, W /o Late Lalithkumar, age. 66 5n-s, Occ.House wife, R/o Flat.no.415, Solitaire abode, Sridevi Theatre, beside Bachpanschool, Chandanagar, Serilingampally, N/o Gariba post paroo, Muzafarpoordist, Bihar state 9 4) Ragini @ Ragini Sharma W/o Kundankumar, age. 50 yrs, Occ. House'"r'ife, R/o Patahi Rup, pakahiKhas. Muzafarpoordist, Bihar state. 5) Kumud @) R. Kumud Sharma W/o Sharma, age. 40 yrs, Occ. Housewife, R/ o Selvavinayaga-r colony, thiruthangal, Virtrdhunagar, Tamilnadu- 626 I 30. 6) Nidhi @ Nidhi Devi, W/o Chandankumar, age. 42 yrs, Occ.House rr i :. R/o Patahi Rup, PakahiKhas, Muzafarpoordis t, Bihar state. 7) Kundan @) Kundan Kumar S/o Rajeshrvar Thakur, Age:51, Occ: Business R/o Patahi Rup, pakahiKhas, Muzafarpoordist, Bihar state. Respondents No. 3,8 to T are Rep by their GPA holder, Navaneeth Kumar S/o Late Laiith Kumar, Aged about 31years, Occ: Software Employee, R/o Flat No. 415, Sollitaire Abode, Sriclevi Theater, Beside Bachpan School, Chandir .iag;rr, Serlingampalll. Mandal, R. R.District. Respondents/Ac<:rr ;cd No. I to 6 JOINT MEMO It is submitted that the petitioner/defacat r :omplainalt have amicably settled the dispute at the interverr rn of elders, friends ald well wishers and the matt(_.l has been compromised between them. Hence the both pa - ies came to t0 compromise and the parties of have no claims or rights against each other in the future. #+ I I I I l Signature ot ccused No. 1 f\ r^nri" S)-r.q't^ Signatuie of Accdsed No. 2 ,ts3ffia:|odlrsHx," . ,.*,1"1.trtr1., Signa ,d:4h."Qgt^o *"., s is,dKu, gtdf xt.k"tt( u Signat e-\":--- n*-J of Complainant Counsel for the Accused Counse I e Complainant