The High Court · 2025

2. Smt. Fahima Sulthana @ Roma, W/o Mohd. Feroz, Age. 35 years, Occ: Housewife, Rl/o H. No. 34/3, B-Block, Madhupark Ridge Apartments, Bandlaguda Jagir, Hyderabad - 500086. ...Respondents/ComPlai nant fetition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR No. 1057 of 2025, on the file of Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad, against the Petitioner/ Accused is concerned, by recording the compromise to secure the ends of justice. l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 Between: Smt. Fahima Sulthana @ Roma, Wo Mohd.Feroz, Age. 3S'years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o H. No. 3Zl3, B-Block, Madhupark Ridge Apartments, Bandlaguda Jagir, Hyderabad - 500086. ... Petitioner/Com plai nant AND 1 The State of Telangana, Through S.H.O., Rajendranagar Police-Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad i l I : j I I I t,

2. Sri Mohc . Feroz, S/o Abdul Wahid, Age: 40 years, Occ: Bank Employee, R/o H.No. 3413, B-Block, Madhupark Ridge Apartments, Bandlaguda Jagir, Hyderab:rd - 500086 ...RespondenUAccused l.A. NO: 2 OF 1'-025 Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit, Joint memo of compromise along with Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the compromise between the Petitioner/Victim and the 2nd Respondent/accused and compound the offences in FIR No. 1051 of 2025 on the file of Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad l.A. NO: 3 OF 21125 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the alfidavit, Joint memo of compromise along with Petition, the High Court may be llleased to record the compromise between the PetitionerA/ictim and the 2nd Re:;pondent/Accused and compound the offences in FIR No. 1051 of 2025 on the fikr of Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad, in the interest of Justice. This Petil.ion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of tlriminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Malchalmre i-{ari Vastav, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on tlehalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Hari Chandra Aditya, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent No.2. The Gourt made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in FIR No.1O57 of 2025 on the file of Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 109(1) and 85 of BNS.

2. tt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondent No.2 that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos-2 & 3 of 2025 have been filed by respondent No.2 to record compromise between them. The FIR was registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 109(1) and 85 of BNS against the petitioner herein. However, the affidavit filed by the victim discloses that the complaint was made in a fit of anger and misunderstanding and that there Was no intention on the part of her husband to cause any harm to her. However, the differences have been resolved and they amicably decided to maintain peace and harmony. Therefore, she submitted a letter dated

15.10.2025 to the concerned sHo expressing her decision to withdraw the comptaint and requesting the authorities not to pursue the matter , .I I I J] i ! Ii' I 2 ETD. J l.A.Nos.z & 3 of 2025 iiland Cdp.No.l 4596 of 2025 further, following which the present compromise petition has been filed. ln view oF the same, since the allegations under 109(1) of BNS are intended tr: be withdrawn by the defacto complaint, the alleged offence punishable under section Bs of BNS is compoundable. Hence the compromise is recorded.

3. The learned Additional public prosecutor has opposed the compromis,e petition

4. The c'efacfo complainant and the accused are wife and husband. since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel befirre the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana v,ide orders dated 11.11.202s passed by this court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shatl identify the parties and submit ar report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High court Legal services committee for the State of relangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 19.11.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromise. \ -/ 3 ET'D, J l.A.Nos.2 & 3 d 2025 in/and Cdp-No.14596 ot 2025

6. In view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in FIR No.1057 of 2025 on the file of Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad, registered against the petitioner/accused are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner/accused is paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:SB1N0020070, MICR No.500004057), within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/. A. /TRUE COPY// OFFICER To,

1. The Xl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Cou Cyberabad at Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy

2. The Station House Officer, Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] -4 One. CC to Sri Malchalmre Hari Vastav, Advocate [OPUC]

5. One CO to Sri Hari Chandra Aditya, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two Ct) Copies ABK/SA Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise I Note: Total Arnount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Malchalmr,: Hari Vastav, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide ordt:r dated 27.11.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Siainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "S)ecretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangyana" and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 143503 of 2025 and Rece'pt No. 1787 dated 10-12-2025. \k + :99.4';.:r"" i,' -ii '.1;r ,. J 12,I HIGH COURT DATED: 2711112025 \ \ COMMON ORDER I.A.Nos.2 and 3 ol2O25 ln/And CRLP.No.14596 o12025 f ilE SI/l f C ?T JAN 2026 * *o ALLOWING THE l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ol2O25 AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION ^-{&fr- r.t-l:.::. t( ]VTEMORAND{JM OF CRIMINAL MISC.PETITION _-. ___!!1<ier sectio,3s9 g)d'(fl ffi'FoR coMpRoMISE) IN THB HON'BI.E HTGI{ COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: I-IYDERABAD CrlM.I'}.No. ()F 2025 IN C.R.LP. NO oF 2A2s (Against the FIR No. 1057 of 2a25, on the file of Rajendranagar potrice Station, Cyberabad) Petitioner/Accused Sri Mohd, Feroz, S/o Abdut Wahid, Age: 40 years, Occ: Bank Emplol,-e.J, Wo H No 3413, B-B lock, Madhupark,Ridge Apartments, Bandlaguda Jagir:, Hlzderabad - 500086. l. The Stattr of Telarigitna, ' Through S.H.O., Rajendranagar police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. Rep: by Fublic Proi-ecutor, High Corl:t at HYderabad,',t' ":'r:;-' ,:. . - , , .' .

2. Smt. Fahima Sulthana @ Roma, Wo Age: 35 years,Occ: . No. 3413, B-Block, Apartments, Bandlaguda Mohd. Feroz, I{ousewife,R./o H. Madhupark fudge Jagir, Hyderabad - ..,Resp ondents/Comp lainant CO BY THE RESPONDENT No.2 (.

1. The de facto complainant lodged a complaint resulting in registration of FIR No.'1057 of 2025'on the fite of Rajendranagar Police Station, for offlences under Sections 109(f) and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023,against ,ll the accused.. ' I f7 a*&

2. Slrbsequ,:nt to registratir:n of the case, rvith the interrrention of e]ders and u,ell- ivishers, both parties have anricably settled their disputes. 'l-he de facto complair ant has lto subsisting grievance against tire accusccl ancl does not lvish to pursue tlte rtratter further.

3. 'ihe dc f,rcto conrplainant has alreadt'submitted a leitcr clatecl i j.10.2025 tct the Station House Officer, Rajendranagar Police Station, stating lter intention Lo r.r,ithcltln, the complaint.

4. 'fl-re1" aie blessed u'ith two daughters, and in order to ensure their well-being and to niaintain peace and hannonv within the family, both parties have mtttuallv deciclecl to put an end to all disputes and misunderstandings. Thei, Itave clto:;en to avoid unnecessary issues and to lead their lives in a corclial ancl healthl' rr:lationship 1'or the r.velfure ol'their chiidren and family.

5. Both parties now submit that they have resolved all differences peacefully and undertakt: to maintain cordial relations henceforth. The complainant affirrns that the cornplaint r.vas made in a rnoment of emotional distress and that she cloes not rtesire to continue criminalproceedings.

6. It is there,fore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the compromise between the parties and quash the proceedings arising out of FIR No. 1 057 of 202-5, in the interest ofjustice and equity. Petitionor/Accused 2nd Respondent/ victim fcr Petitioner/Accused C DATE: PLACE: HYJ)ERABAD Respondent/Victim z : -6t I I I