The High Court · 2025

Smt. K.Vani, Wo Mohan Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ- Housewife, Rl/o H.No. 8-7-55/8/74, Shiridi Sai Nagar Colony, Hasinapuram, Kharmanghat, Hyderabad -79. ...PETITIONER AND

1. Gadeela Janla Reddy, S/o late Laxma Reddy, Aged about 70 years, Occ Nil. R/o.H..No.3-f23l2, Gundla Pochampally Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District Since he is mentally imbalanced, he represented by His wifg, G.Sujatha Wo.Janga Reddy, Aged 60 years, Occ- Housewife, R/rc { Ng 3- 12312, Gundla Pochampali, village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2. Smt.G.Jyothi, Wo.Shashidhar Reddy, Aged about 44 years, Occ- Housewife, R/o.FlatNo.201, Shiva Sai Residency, Road No.S, Krishi Nagar, Nagole, Hyderabad a

3. G.Sunitha, Wo Jagan Mohan Reddy, Aged about 39 years, Occ, Housewife, Rr/o.H.No.3-5-29/2, Hyderguda Village, Rajendranagar mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist.

4. R. Kalpana, Wo.Raju, Aged about 36 years, Oce- Housewife, H.No.4-2-1412, Sri Nagar Colony, Road No.9, Century High School, Rotary Nagar, Khanapuram Haveli, Khammam.

5. G. Jagan Mohan Reddy, S/o late Chandra Reddy, Aged about 46 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o. H. No .3-5-29 12, Hyderguda village, Rajend ranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist

6. Smt. B.Subhashini, Wo B.Venkatram Reddy, Aged about 41 years, Occ- Housewife, R/o H.No. 8-1-16122, Plot No. 22, Kranthi Nagar, Kharmanghat, Hyderabad. (Respondent No. 6 is not necessary party in this petition) ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the learned Honble Il Additional District and Sessions Judge - cum - I Addl. Family Court, Medchal tvlalkajgiri District to dispose of the suit in O.S.No. 841 of 2016 as expeditiously as possible and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. KOTHA UDAY KIRAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER 5 (' HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE IC LAKSHMAI[ ORAL ORDER: Heard Mr. Kotha Udaykiran Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner herein is plaintiff No.l in o.S. No.g4l of 2016 pending on the file of II Additional District and sessions Judge - cum - I Additional Family court, Medchal - Malkajgiri District. She and her sister, respondent No.6 herein have filed the aforesaid suit against the respondent Nos.l to 5 herein seeking partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties. The suit is of the year 20t6. Even then, the trial court is not disposing of the said suit in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

3. Learned counsel, on instructions, would submit that an interlocutory application filed by the pldintiffs to bring the legal representations of deceased No.3 and petition filed by defendant No.5 to set aside ex parte order, are pending. The suit is posted to a

24.11.2025 and it is.6oming up for plaintiffs' evidence. Therefore, she is seeking a direction to trial Court for disposal of the said suit in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. \ \ : / I !J 'j I ! I 2 *o.#rtjorro* "*. 4' perusar of record wourd revear that respondent No.l defendant No.l was 70 years as on the date of firing of the suit. Now, he is aged 7g years. The year lggg was observed as ..Intemational Year of order persons"- In view of the ,.Nationar poricy for order Persons" adopted by the Government of India, the erstwh,e High court of Andhra pradesh at Hyderabad issued a circurar vide ROC'No.4790/rggg/op cer-', dated .o2.tt.rggg directing a, the Judicial officers in the State to identify and dispose of mafters in which persons above "65 years" of age are invorved, on priority basis. Subsequentry, erstwhire the High court of Andhra pradesh Circulars vide ROC.No.3 465 /E-t /2003, issued dated 05.t2.2003, ROC.No. t23O/Op Cell-E/2005, dated 20.08.2005 and ROc'No.3 465/E-1/2003, dated 14.12.20, and rhe High courr of Judicature at Hyderabad for the States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh vide Circular in ROC.No.S 226/Op Cell-E/2014, dared 20'12.20t4' in which specific instructions are issued to give priority to the cases rerating to senior citizens for the expeditious disposar. In the present case, the suit is of the year 20r6and it is fired for partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties. a , I i I / I I i i J KLJ CRP No.4054 of2025

5. Considering the said facts and the relief sought, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself by waiving with notice to respondent Nos.l to 5 by invoking power of this Court under Article - 227 of the Constitution of India. Leamed II Additionat District and Sessions Judge - cum - I Additional Family Court, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, shall dispose of the aforesaid O.S. No.84l of 2016 strictly in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. In the circumstances of the cases, there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the revision shall stand closed. SD/- P.POI\INA KRISHNA, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,/TRUE COPY/' CT]ON OFFICER a To,

1. The ll Additional District and Sessions Judge - cum - I Addf . Family Court, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

2. The Xl Additional District Judge, Medchal, Medchal Malkajgiri District. 3. One CC to SRl. KOTHA UDAY KIRAN REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies PK/PSL JKS HIGH COURT DATED:1411112025 d 4t' I t CRP.No.4054 of 2025 TilE S Te q o() 1 6 JAlt 202$ z. l ..11r,-^ DISPOSED OFF Trs =[tfz-e I