The High Court · 2025

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BTIASKAR 1T }DDY CONTEMPT cAsE No.3169 of 2025 DATE : 12.12.2025 Between: Chepuri Sudershan AND Pel itioner C. Narayana Redd1,, and two others ORDER: Respor:r ( I ts/'Contemnors This Conternpt Case is l'ilccl to summon i L rl punish the respondents alleging willful and deliberate violatror of the orders dated 01.05.2025 passed by this Cour[ in Writ periri n No.138 I5 of

2. This Court uide order dated 0I.05.202r clisposed of W.P.No 138 15 ot2O25, with the iollor.ving dircctions: "9 In weu.' of the qbove subntrssions, tltis (:ourt [s oj te opinrctl that the ends of justice woulcl ba nrcl tf the petihone,' : peti,titted. to. make a fresh applicatrcn un(1er the provisions ., th. Bhu Bharqtt Act and the Rules mad_e thereunder and n lL : evenf o1 such app[tccttion being submitted bg the petittoner, the t ,spondeit authoities shall consider the_ case of the petitrcner for tL rlctton of the reuenue enties qnd .on""qu.ritiol iisuance of ,t e amended pattadar pcssbook. In anV euent, if the petiiron t has not co-nLplie.s with the requirentents of tLLe provisions ,), the Bhu Bharati Act and the Rules made ih.r"uid"r, por" ., ,eoron"d order and communicate the reasons thereon b lhe p<,t t ,nir. fn entire exercise sLnll be completed u.tithin a period o. .lvee (03) months from the date of recetpt of a copy of this order ; CHADA vrr/\ A ilxi'llffiliii#j,3i^ EHAsKAR R: )DY oare 2025 r 2 r s 14 26 oo r0r,lo. 2 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revcnue, appearing for the respondcnts, on written instrucLions, q/ould submit that the petitioner served a copy ol the order dated 01.O5.2025 on

19.O5.2O25 through a coverinq lettcr but dicl not applv through the Bhu Bharati Portal as directcd. Upon receipt of the representation, the petitioner was adviscd to apply online through the Bhu Bharati Portal for correction of revenue entries and issuance of pattadar passbook. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted an onlinc application under the "Missing Survcl' Nurnbers" module secking muta[ion of his name [o an extent ol Ac.0.3(r gur]tas in Survcy No.688 of Madgul Village and Mandal, Rarrgarecldv Distric:t, vidc Application No.2500029799, dated 16.05.2025. It is fur[hcr submitted that in compliance with the directions of this Court, tl-rc said application was taken up for verificalion with the available records. On verihcation, it was found that Survey No.688 total admeasuring Ac.12.38 guntas, classified as patta land, and thc entirc extent stands recorded in the names of twelve individuals in thc Bhu Bharati Portal. It is stated that there is no fcasibilit-v to eflect cxtent correction or entry in favour of the petitioner unless corrcsponding reduction or deduction is made from the holdings of the recorded pattadars. It is further submitted that, in accordance with the proccdure prescribed under the Bhu Bharati Act and the Rules made thcreunder, notices were issued to the concerned rccorded iI'rdividuals calling upon them to D'd rllv (idned bv( HADA CHADA VIJAYA,'irrrnr.risr.rnirroor BHASKAR REDDy o;rF-2or5.12.rs r4 2o!6 l produce documentary evidence in respect of lands tr Survey No.6gg of Madgul Village and Mandal, Rangareddy Distrr.: . Howeve r, the notices could nol be served personaily as the pa I rdars were not residing in the village, and thereflore service was r i]'ected through WhatsApp. Despite such service, none of tht_, plr,t rclars appeared bclorc the olficc or submitted documentan- r.vidence, and consequently, the inquiry could not be conclt < r,d r.vithin thc stipulated time, The respondents sought a sh, r I extension to complete the inquiry and pass appropriate orders in rccordanoc with Iart.

4. Having regard to the above submissions i r tl t hc mirterial placed on record, this Court is o[ tl-re vieri. thal ncr -.rse is maclc out to I'rold that the respondents have u illfully or dclibt:r I i:iy t,iolatcd thc orders o[ this Court so as to attracl the provisions t- Ite Oontempt ol CoLlrts Act, 1971.

5. Accordir-rgl1,, this Contempt Case is closed Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand clcs .d SD/. K.AMMAJI I] :PUTY REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, I I 1 2 J C.Narayana Reddy, S/o. Not known Aged about 45 Yea r ; Occ District Collector, O/o. the District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Rarl a Reddy District. Anantha Venkat Reddy, S/o. Not known, Aged about 5- /ears, Occ: R.D.O.;.: O/o. the Revenue Divisional Officer, lbrahimpatnam D vir ion, Ranga Reddy District. Vinay Sagar, S/o- Not Known, Aged about 48 Years, Or:r . Tahsildar, O/o. the Tahsildar, Madugula Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. I ;-:i-i*I I i I i I l I i I

4. One CC to SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR .Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana louTl

6. Two CD Copies { { I{M/PSI- y, I 1 Or. Y (t .h); .\ '('.-('t, z r I I 202ri .rJ, i -{' * r -ATC It \ { i i I i I I ! I I I I ! j i l I HIGH COURT DATED:1211212025 I \ ORDER CC.No.3'169 ot 2025 .)o '() \% \." CLOSING OF THE CONTEMPT CASE ^bnJ