The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.3063 of 2021 on the file of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No 3063 of 2021 on the file of the Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad 7/ // t' I.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Angothu Shravanthi, D/o Late Venkata Ratnam, Employee, R/o Btock No.H, Room No.158, AMD Begumpet, Hyderabad. o ed 25 years, Occ Private uarters, Shyamlal Building, ... Petitioner/R2 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad

2. Pangole Pavan Kumar, S/o Pangole Anjaneyulu, aged 24 years, Occ Private Employee, Rt/o H.No.1-11-94/1/5, Bombay Halwa Compound, Shyamlal Building, Begumpet, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compound the offences u/s 394 lPC. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise between the respondent No-2 and the petitioner in C.C.No.3063 of 2021 on the file of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri D Rajendra Prasad, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: CoMMON OROER I I a / THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.14152 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.3063 of 2021 on the file of Xl Additional Chbf Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Section 394 of the lndian Penal Code, 1860 (for short'lPC')

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner- accused as well as respondent No.2-de facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed seeking to compound the offences and to compromise the matter in the above C.C., respectively.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavit filed by lhe de facto complainant in I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly I I 2 I:TD.J CiD llli2 )oJs -i) consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide order dated 31.10.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuanl to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Adhority identified the parties and submitted a report to that effect stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.3063 of 2021 on the file of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad, registered against the petitioner- accused, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner-accused paying an amount of Rs.S,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the I \ 7 / // 1 -t ETD. J Crlp_11152_2025 Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/_ (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana Bar Association, Hyderabad, within a period of three (03) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. S -M.OSMAN ALI BAIG AS STANT REGIS i/TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad 2. The Station House Officer, Begumpeta Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, Hrgh Court for the State of Telangana at \I I t I I Hyderabad [OUTI

4. One CC to SRI D Rajendra Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies ABK,?SL Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10.0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri D Rajendra Prasad, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 20.11 2025 as Rs. 5,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the 'Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana', and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only )to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of complianc€ USR No. 135357 of 2025 and Receipt No. 1747 dated 25-11-2025. I HIGH COURT DATED: 2011112025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.14152 of 2025 STA \.< o o 2l JAN zut f. .rl * , ALLOWING THE l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION @ &- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD 1 CRL.P.NO. 11,,7OF2025 lrl jJ"2_ Between: Pangole Pavan KumarS/o Pangole Anjaneyulu, aged24 years, Occ: Private Employee, Uo HrN0;1:11-94|Ll5, Bombay Halwa Compound, Shyamlal Building, B€gumpet, Hyderabad. And ...Petitioner

1. The State Public Telangana, Rep. by its High Court foi-the ngana at Hyderabad.

2. Angothu Shravanthi D/o Late Venkata Ra!1am, aged 25.years, Occ: Private Employee;: o Block No.H, Roorn No, 158, AIV_P,Quarters, Shyamlal Building, Begumpet, Hyderabad. JOINT MEMO ...Respondents It is submitted that the petitioner and the respondent No.2 has resolved their isiue and entered into an amicabte settlement at the intervention of €lders and well wishers of both of us and to this effect a separate compromise petition is also filed. Hence this loint Memo. Hyderabad ),'F' Counsel for No.2 Y. Counsel for Petitioner