The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that ir the circumstances stated in the [t4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings in CC.No.762 of 2021 ,on the file of the Il Additional Judicial First Class lvlagistrate at IVlancherial,Unc er section 42O,498- A,506 IPC R/W section3 86 4of D P Act. l.A. NO: 2OF 202s Petition under Section 359(6) BNSS praying that ir the circumstances stated in the l\4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition ihe High Court may be pleased to permit the petitio neri Defa cto complainant to r,'ithdraw the case in CC No 762 of 2023, on the file of the ll Additional Judicial f rst class l\,4agistrate at l\llancherial,Under section 420,498-4,506 IPC R/W sectic r 3 and 4of D p Act. against the respondents No. 2 to 6. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between

1. L. Dara Kumaraswamy, S/o. Lingaiah, Age 59 years, Occ AE, NPDCL, R/o.H.No.12-763/28, Reddy colony, Mancherial, District, -elangana. ) Dara-Harsha, W/o. tVuddapu alias Makkala Lohith, D/O I rara Kumaraswamy Age.27 years, Occ. Student, R/o. H.No 12-763128, RedC5 cotony, Mancherial fpsently residing.Now at 602, lVlisson cirle, Texas, USI- Represented by her SPA Holder Dara Kumaraswamy S/o. Lingaiah, Age 59 ,l rars, Occ. AE, NPDCL, R/o H No 12-763, Reddy Colony l\,4ancherial Dir; rict Telangana .. Petitioner/Respondent NO.2/Defacto Complainat in l.A,l los.3 and 4 ot 2O2S AND 1 The State of Telangana,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, l- gh Court for the State of Telangana Hyderabad through WPS Srirampur, I hncherial. ...Respondent in l.A.l los.3 and 4 ot 2025

2. lVluddapu @ tt/akkala Lohith, S/o Kishore alias Narsimha, Age. 33 yrs, Occ. Software Employee, R/o. 6-2-326, New Boiguda, Secunderabad, 500003, Presently residing at 3612 white hall green lane Apt-5203,charlotte, north Carolina-28273,USA. Represented by his SPA Holder Radhika C/o M. Shiva Prasad, Aged about 32 years, Occ Pvt. Employee, Rlo 2-2-19311 Bharath Nagar Colony, Amberpet, Hyderabad, Telangana.

3. Muddapu Narsimha alias Kishore, S/o. Late Basaiah, Age. 62 years,Occ. Retired Railway emp, R/o. 6-2-326, New Boiguda, Secu nderabad-500003. 4. Muddapu Vani, W/o. Narsimha, Age. 53 years, Occ. House wife, Rlo.6-2-326, New Boiguda, Secunderabad-500003.

5. Guddeti Radha, W/o. Srinivasa Rao, Age. 50 years, Occ. Private employee R:/o.H. No.1-6-39/2511 , Raod No.17 Dinakar Nagar, West Venkatapuram, Alwal-500015

6. tVluddapu Geethika, D/o. Narsimha, Age.25 years,Occ. Studying at Canada, R/o. 6-2-326, New Boiguda, Secunderabad, 500003, Presently residing at Ontari, Canada, Represented by her SPA Holder Radhika Wo $rl.Shiva Prasad, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, Rlo 2-2-19311 Bharath Nagar Colony, Amberpet, Hyderabad, Telangana ...Respondents/Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 in LA.NOs.3 and 4 ot 2O25 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings as against the respondents No.2 to 6 in CC No 762 oI 2023, on the file of the ll Additional Judicial first class Magistrate at [Vancherial, Under section 42O , 49 B-A, 506 IPC R/VV section 3 and 4of D P Act. l.A. NO: 4OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased permit the Petitioner to compound the offences in CC No.762 of 2023, on the file of the ll Additional Judicial first class Magistrate at Mancherial, Under section 420,498-A, 506 IPC R/VV section3 & 4of D P Act. in pursuant to the compromise entered into by the parties thereby quashing the CC No.762 of 2023,on the file of the ll Additional Judicial first Class Magistrate at Mancherial, and to pass such other order or orders as this Court deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing he l\,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing ther arguments of Sri JANARDHAN GOUD SUNKARI, Advocate for the Petitic ner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and of Sri V. lranthi, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3, and none appeared for the Re pondent Nos.4 to 6. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2O2S IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.14640 of 2o25 Date: 04.L2.2025 Betwee n: Mudclapu fer) Makkala Lo}-rith al-rd lor-t r othcrs. ....I't,titioncrs/Accuscd Nos. i to 5 AN I) The Statc of Telanganzr, rep. b-r its I)ublic Prosecutor, High Court lbr thc Statc of Tclangana, Hydcrabad through WI)S Srirampur, Manchcrial ar-rd another. Rcsponder-r t s COMMON ORDER: Thrs Criminal Pctrtion has b<:ctt ['ilcd ttr thc pctitioners/accuscd Nos. 1 fo 5 seeking to quash thc prt.rcccdings in C.C.No.762 ol 2023 on the file of II Additional .iudicial Irrrsl Class Magistralc at Mancheria[.

2. Heard Mr..Janardhan (]oud Sunakari, learned counsel for the pctitioners and Mr.V.Kranthi, Iearncd cout-rsel for respondenl Nos.2 and 3. 3 Learned counsel lor the petitioners, submitted that during the pendency of thc present Criminal Petition, at the instance o[ the wcll r,vishcrs, relative's and cide rs, thc parl ics havc sctlled thc dispules - pelrding bc:Lu ct:n Lhcm ancl entcrcd into cornpr.,r nlsc lrnd liletl .loint Nlcrno. Acr orrlingh., rite p.Lrtics havc Ilk:cl LA.\lr r..1 anrl 4 r,f 2().25 to lterrtrit lhcnt rc rci:ord ll-tc c.rnpr.rnisr: c.t.ri:rl l).1\\.(.(,. ttr.rrr .t.cl t. c'trlttpclL.tttri tlti' olfcncc:s reslrr:ctit,r,lr,. IIC hll I i,r- srrltntjLrL,rl rhirt rr('tlLi()r('r' i\ rs r i,rcl 5:lrc bci.rg rcp.es.rrrt.rr r^ rr .ir- Spar:i;11 I)c:r,,r:r ar. A [oltrc-r nl:1, ],- (iLrcldcti RrLdha, u.ho u.irs .lrr.:r\ (.c rs Pi:titiortcr No..1. 4 I.l This (tor-tr-r r.,irJe order, datccl 20. I I .2O2r Il.rc pt:titionc't's :rncl resltor-rclcnt Nos.2 arrri i] r rr-t-c tcri tlt( l)irnics I ) it[)J)(]:lr It|lrtrr' the I lieh Cotrrt Lcrsir] Scr.viccs 2/ I 1.2O25. Irr r.onrpliancc Committcr', I]r.dcr-r lrrd. orr or be'filre o[ the sard ordcr, t t( S('r-ret:1n, [l lgi.) Cr tL Leg:r S('r-\ ic(,s Cornrnlttcc, Itlrs sultrrr I t <l l.cl)ot.r. (liltcd 2l l1 2025, sr;rt ing rlt;rt thc petitroncr Nos.2 to .l r ucrr clul-r' iclr'rrtrfiecl uith copies of thetr Aadl_rerr sfatcd thal tl]( l).trti(.s i.c. pctitioncr Nos.2 to.] have $ illfr-rlh irrrd $ ithouL any coercion cntcred iDt ) :)otni)rorntse 5. r (l t-( sl)on(l( nt No.2 ( iLrrls. It is Iurtlter r 1rcsltonclc.rrt No.2 Learnerl cc,unscl for respondent Nos.2 ancl l] behaiI of r-csponclcnt No.i]_Dar:r Harsha, her Spccii I Floldcr namclr, Dar:r Iirrrrtaraswamy/ rcspondcn t Ni,. the High Court l_.cgal Serviccs Committec. I{c lru.rl respondent Nos._2 and 3 do not have any objecl pror cedings .rq rirrsr rlt,' pcritrorrcr Nus.I il.(l ., petilioner Nos.2 to 4 llls s t zl tc(i Iltitt on I)ovr cr ol- At torncl, 2 appcart'rl bc fore r s Lll)lni Llcd that :rn to quash the r lso, 21112,11 1 1j-6p

6. In view of tl-rc said report and also in vicr,r. of the compromise eutered between the pctitioners and rcsponcrent Nos.2 and 3 as u,eri as rhc submissions madc br thc respccttvc partir:s, I A.Nos.3 and .1 of 2025 are allou:ed. Consequentll.-, the proceedings in C.C.No.762 of 2o23 on the lile of II Aclditio.ral .Jucliciai IrirsL clerss Magistrate at \{:rrrche.a1, are hercby qu:rshcd against the petitio.crs/accused Nos. t to5 7 . Accorclinglv, the Criminal pctilion is allovr.cci, subjccl to payment o[ costs of Rs.10,0OO/ (Rupees ten thousancl onhJ to Lhc High Court l-egal Serviccs committee and Rs.s,ooo/ (Rupees f^,c thor-rsancr o.rr5,) to thc Telangana High Court Advocates Associatior.r, Hyderabad, bv the petitioners rvithin one q,eek from todav. Miscellaneous applications, pcnding if any, shall stand closed. SD/. A.JAYASREE SSISTANT REGIST ,TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To, The llAdditional JUdicial First Class lVagistrate at Mancherial. The StationHouse officer, wpS srirampur at lvlancheriar porice station, lvlancherial District. Two ccs to the Pubric prosecutor, High court for the State of rerangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 2 3 --

4. One CC to SRI JANARDHAN GOUD SUNKAR|, Advoc;r e [OpUC] 5. tlre CC to IVs V.Kranth, Advocate iOpUCl 6. Trvo CD Copies along with c;opy of joint [r,4emo is enclosed herewitl- Note: An amount of Rs. 15.000r (Rupees fifteen thousand on I ) has been paid by Sri S Janardhan Goud, counser for the petitioner as directed ly the Hon,bre court vrde order daled 04j22025 to the "High court Legar Servi; rs committee, High court forthe State ofrerangana, Hyderabad, and Rs.10,0001 (F upees ten thousand only) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, l- yderabad and fited I\rlemo as proof of compliance USR No.14622 5 of 2025. NVB HIGH COURT JSR,J DATED:0411212025 COMMON ORDER ,": 'l) 4' l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.14640 of 2A25 Tio ? "{r.\, .S \v i\ L \:, },i'l x ll ' !, :.l,,rii o- LL l- & \, ci' H'):i'l -4- ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETIT|ON l\ND t.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2025 &) "C MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA Between : Crl.P.No. of 2025 i. Muddapu @ Malcl<ala Lohith S/o Kishore (zr) Narsimha, Agc: 33 1,rs, Occ: So[Lrr:rrc Employee, R/o.6-2 326, Ncrr l3oiguda, Secunderabad, 500003, Presentl_r' residing at 3612 white hall green lane Apt 52 03, charl o 1 te, north C ar olina- 28273, U SA Represented by his SpA Holder Radhika C/o Nl.Shiva prasad, Agecl about 32 -r'car.s, Occ : pvt. trmployee, R/o 2-2 193/ 1 lSherrath Nagar Colony, Amberpet, Hvderabad, Telangala

2. Muddapu Narsirnha (a) I(ishore S/o. Late Basaiah, Age: 62 1,ears,Occ. Retired Railvray emp, R/o. 6 2 326, New, Boiguda, Secunderabad, 5OO0O3,

3. Muddapu Vani W/o. Narsimha, Age: 53 years, Occ: House wife, R/o. 6 2-326, Ner,r,Boiguda, Secunderabad, 500003,

4. Guddeti Radha W/o. Srinivasa Rao, Age: 50 years, Occ: private employee R,io.H.No. 1-6-39 I 25 I 1, Raod No. 17, Dinakar Nagar, West Venkatapura_m, Alrval,5OO0 15, - .) X{r.rddapu Geethika D/o. Narsimira, Age:25 5,c:rrs .Occ: Studl.ing at Canada, R lo. 6-2 3 16, Neu. Boigucla, Sr:cundcrabacl, 5O0O03, Presently residrng at Ontari, Cernad:r,, Represented by her SpA Holder R:rdl.rika W/ o NT. Shir a prasarl Aged about 3?.r'earrs, L)cc : pr,t. Emplo.r,ee, R/o 2 2- 193/ 1 Bharath Nagar C)olon1., Anrberpet, FIl,derabad, Telangana , .. Petitioners./.1 :cused No. 1 to 5 And ..Respondent

1. Thr: State of .l.e1angana, Rep. by its public prosecutcr-, High Court for the State of Telangana Hycier:rbacl through WPS Srirampur, IVIar-rclrenal.

2. Dar a I(umarasu,amy S/o. Lir_rgaiah, Age; 59 years, Occ: Atr, NPDCL, R/o.H.No. 12 763 / 28,Reddy color.r1,, Mancherial District, Telangana..

3. Dara Harsha ,W/o. Mudrlapu @ Makkala Lohith, D/O. Dara Kumaraswamy Age:27 year.s, Occ: Student, R/o. H.No.l2_263 / 2a, Reddy colony, Mancherial Presently residing Non, at 6O2, Missor_r cirle, Texas, USA. Represented by her SPA Holder Dara Kumaras\vamy S/o- Lingaiah, Age; 59 years, Occ: AE, NPDCL, R/ o.H. No. I 2-7 63 I 28,Redd1r colonv, Mancherial District, Telangana.. . . . . Re sp ondents / Defacto - Cornp lainant MOU AND JOINT MEMO FILED BY THE PETITIONERS AND RESPONDENT NO.2

1. It is submitted that thc petitioner herein filed the above qtlash petition seeking to quash the proceedings in CC No 762 of 2O23,on the file of the Hon'b1e II Addl judicial first class Nlagistrate at lVlancherial, The Respondent No.2 has lodged the above case against the petitioners/Accused No.1 to 5 U Under section 420,498-A,506 IPC R/W section3 & 4of D P Act. wherein the petitioners were hgured AS Accused

2. It is humbly submitted that the de facto complainart and petitioners have entered into a Memoraldurn of Understalding ald deciding upon the future with the intervention of elders. We in order to ameliorate the differences have decided to compromise and settle the matter once for all. We have settled the disputes amicably .- r{i and the petitioncrs/Accused No.1 to 5 ar cl the Respondent No.2 ha'e agreecl to scttle the present cli.. rute i, cc No 762 of 2023,on the lile of the Honble II Ad(ll iudicial first ciass Magistrate ':rt Mancherial, before this lon,ble Court. As such we have filed a petition seeking this llonble Court to record the comprornisc. 'lirc contents me.: tioned in the said compromise petition are true a,d correcl ,o the best of our knowledge ald belief. The said cornprom:r c is enterecl with free will and conscnt and urithout any co.r -cion. Hence, we are filing Lhe prcscntjoinr N,lemo. It is therefore prayed that this HonJ:le CorL .t rrray be pleased to permit the Petitioner-herein to compound tlrr: offences with the Respondents No.1 to 5 herein by recording cor tpromise ald by allowing the Criminal petition filed by the respo.r lents against CC No 762 of 2o23,on the file of the Flonble II Aclclr . udicial first crass Magistrate at Mancherial, Under section +2u,+e.1 4,506 IPC R/W .section3 & 4of D p Act. and pass such other orclcr. or orders as this Hon'ble Court ma5r deem fit and proper in the r ircumstalces of the case. Hyderabad, Dt. 29-t0-2025 -- A yzr- PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1 r^1 - NJe^.- PETITIONER/ACCUSED 2 M G^r" PtrTITIONER/ACCUSED 3 GpBritrb NtrR/ACCUStrD 4 PtrTITIO ER/ACCUStrD 5 a--\' COUNStrL F'OR THE P TITIONtrR 11- fu-"-nlLi COUNStrL FOR RES I ,^ --) =",--.1 PONDENT NO.2 RtrSPONDENT No.2/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT