M/s. Prajay Engineers Syndicate Limited v. 1. The State of Telangana

5. Smt. K. Jaya Eshwar Reddy, Wo K. Eshwar Reddy, Aged abou-t 77 years, Occ. Hous6wife, Fi./o 8-2-293lNL/258, Plot No.258, Road No. 10, MLA and tt/P Colony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033.

6. Sri K. Rakesh Reddy, S/o K. Eshwar Reddy, Aged about 58 years, O,c.c Business. Ryo 8-2-283lNL1258, Plol No. 258, Road No. 10, MLA and IVP Colony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033.

7. Sri K. Mahesh Reddy, S/o K. Eshwar Reddy, Aged about Major, Occ.Business, Rio B-2-203INU258, PIot No. 258, Road No. 10, MLA and MP Colony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033.

8. Sri P. Gopal Reddy, S/o 'P. Govind Reddy, Aged about 58 -Chinna -yqqr9' Vangara Village, Markal, Warangal District, Occ.Agriculture, R/o Telangana

9. Sri K. Raja Venkat Reddy, S/o Late K. Eshwar Red-dy, Aged about 58 years. Occ.Business, Fyo 8-2-203lNU258, Plot No.25B, Road No. 10 C. MLA and MP Colony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033 ...RESPONDENTS { e Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lr r circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th€ pleased to issue a writ, Order or Direction more particularly Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent fJ, into consideration the representation dated 26.05.2025 respondents i.e., Respondent No. 5 to 9 illegally mi; classifying, the property admeasuring Ac. 11-26 Gts.. in 1213t4 (o-28\, 1214tA (5-19), 1215 (1-03) and 1216 (2-38t lVledchal, Ranga Reddy District as an agricultural land on (the then Dharani Portal) and claiming monies under Rhyt I arbitrary, illegal and u nconstitutio na I and consequentially c 2 to set aside the mutation of the unofficial Respondents respect to Subject Property and cancel the New Pattadhar Dharani in view of the same being illegal, arbitrary and ir 3004 of the Constitution and Telangana Pattadhar Pass Telangana Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 in view of the illegal and uncon stitutio na l. ia praying that in the High Court may be one in the nature of a .2lo 4 in not taking rgainst the Unofficial epresenting/ wrongly iy. Nos. 1211 (1-18), ;ituated at Shamirpet, re Bhu Bharati Portal t Bharosa Scheme as irect Respondent No. n Dharani Portal with Passbooks/ entries in riolation of the Article )ooks Act, 2020 and ;ame being arbitrary, lA NO: 1 OF 2025 .Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in tht: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co rt may be pleased to suspend the pattadar passbooks issued in favour of Unoffi ;ial Respondents i.e., Respondent No. 5 to g, pending disposal of the writ petitiol lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the :ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High C(,r rt may be pleased to direct Respondent Nos. 2Io 4 to consider the Representil on dated 26.OS.2OZs of the Petitioner and conduct a detailed enquiry, pendirr{ disposal of the writ petition. 'l lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Unofficial Respondents i.e., Respondent No.5 to g to not to alienate the subject property in favour of third parties, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.VENKATESH, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI N.PAVAN KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER ,.| THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VEI UGOPAL WRIT PETTTION No.33128 of 2o2ti ORDER This Writ Petition is hled seeking the follbu'ir I relief:- "..-to issuc a writ, Order or Direction more p1 one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus dec I action of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not tzl consideraLion the representation, dated 2e against the unoflicial respondents i.e. Respond: to 9 i1lega1l1, misrepresenting/wrongly classil property admeasuring Acs. I 1.26 guntas in S] . (l-18), 1213/A (o-28), 12t4lA (s-1e), 12is il 1216 (2038), situated at Shamirpet, Medcha Reddy District as an agricultural land on Bharati Portal (the then Dharani Portal) alit monies under Rhythu Bharosa Scheme, as illegal ald unconstitutional and consequenti:11 Respondent No.2 to set aside the mutati()r unofhcial Respondents in Dharani Portal witi-r I subject property and cancel the New Passbooks /entries in Dharani Portal in view o being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the Ar A of the Constitution and Telangana Rights in Pattadar Passbooks Act, 2O2O and Telanganrr ' ticularly ring the ing into 05.2025 Lt Nos. 5 lng the Ios.1211 03) artd , Ranga he Bhu claiming rbitrary, y, direct of the rspect to Pattadar he same icle 3O0- ald arrd Revenue Recovery Act, 1864..."

2. Heard Sri A.Venkatesh, learned Ser ior Counsel representing Sri N.Pavan Krishna Reddy, learnecl c runsel fo.,th_: _ l I i I i l : ! I i 1 : 2 Evv,J Wp 33128_202s \' petltloner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and with their consent, this u'rit petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage. In view of the nature of relief sought for in this writ petition, issuance of notice to the unofhcial respondents is dispensed with.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would submit thal respondent Nos.5 to 8, who are the owners and possessors of the land admeasuring Acs.11.26 guntas in Sy.Nos.l2l l, l2l3/A, l2l4 lA, 1215 and 1216 situated at Shamirpet, Medchal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, have approached the petitioner and expressed their intention to entrust the said 'land to the petitioner for the purpose of development into residential plots and farm lands. In furtherance of the mutual understanding and in order to formalizr- the agreed conditions, the petitioner and respondent Nos.s to 8 have entered into a development agreement, dated 27.12.2O02 wherein it was agreed that the petilioner and respondent Nos.5 to 8 each would be entitled to 5O:50 of the total developed property and the petitioner was entitled to sell its 50% share. Learned Senior Counsel would further submit that, even though the subject .? 3 EVV, J Wp_33128 2025 land u.as converted into residential plots, takinl advantage of the possession of pattadar passbooks, t re unofficial respondenrs have been dravving Raithu Bha', sa amounts. Therefore, the petitioner made a represc,l ation, dated

26.05.2025 before the official respondents brir ging to their notice with regard to conversion of the said lancl i Lto residential plots and drawal of Raithu Bharosa amounts b r the unofhcial respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is J at, even after receipt of the said representation, the official r,: pondents did not consider the same.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has not disputed the submission of the petitioner's r )presentation, d.ated 26.05.2O25 and submitted that appropli rre directions would be issued to enable the official responde: -s to examine the case of the petitioner.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the retitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Rever: t e, this Court, without going into the merits and demerits of tht: rase, deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition direcl i lg respondent No.2 to examine the petitioner's represerl ation, dated

26.05.2025 after issuance of notices to all he interested I I (: 4 EVV, J Wp_3312E 2025 s persons including the unofhcial respondents and after affording sufhcient opportunitv of personal hearing to them and after conducting thorough enquiry, pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

6. With the above observations, this Writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/.A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ./' /.,.-11i \__,/ . SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

2. Ihe Collector, Ir,4edchal-Malkajgiri District lntegrated District Office Complexes, Anthaipally Village, Shameerpet Mandal, Telangana - 500078. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Keesara Division, RDO Office, Keesara Division, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana

4. The Tahsildar, Shamirpet Mandal Revenue Office, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana

5. One CC to SRI N.PAVAN KRISHNA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies BSR HIGH COURT DATED: 0311112025 ORDER WP.No.33128 of 2025 .A'[i: '.) s T4 !) o6,r (b/0 ,,.9t .? -_a::. - DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS