Kalevar Gangadhar v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Two CD Copies o '(zora) 8 scc 273 { HIGH COURT DATED:0711112025 , I ORDER CRLP. No.1 4128 of 2025 HE1 S C) u) !l[I ?t?5 12 'li * CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF
Judgment
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad Through, P.S. Nizambad Rurdl, Nizamabad district ...RespondenUComplainants Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 155 of 2025 of PS Nizamabad Rural, Nizamabad district, on such terms and conditions. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. Ram Mohan Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri D. Arun Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER .4 t\ THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.14L28 of 2o.25 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under St:c'iion 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS',) lor grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, who is arrayed as accused in Crime No.155 of 2025 before the Nizarnabad Rural Police Station, Nizamabad District, registered ior the offences punishable under Sections 5 and lO of 'ISTAMI,A.
#2. Heard M. Ram Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for petitioner, as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Pr,:secutor appearing on behalf of the respcndent.
#3. Without going into the merits of the case, since the punishment prescribed for the offences alleged against the petitioner is less than seven (07) years, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to appear before the Investigating officer on or before 14.11.2025 between 11:OO a.m. an<1 O5:OO p.m. and in turn, the Investigtrting Officer is directecl to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 (3) of BNSS (previously Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.) and also the { ( 2 guidelines formulated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumqr a. State of Biharl scrupulously. However, the petitioner shall submit his defense and co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documents/material required for the purpose of the investigation and the Investigating Oflicer shall consider the same before filing appropriate report before the learned Magistrate concerned.
#4. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. //TRUE COPY/ To, SD/. B.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER district
#1. The Station House Officer, Police Station, Nizamabad Rural, Nizamabad 2. One CC to Sri M. Ram Mohan Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to The Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
#4. Two CD Copies o '(zora) 8 scc 273 { HIGH COURT DATED:0711112025 , I ORDER CRLP. No.1 4128 of 2025 HE1 S C) u) !l[I ?t?5 12 'li * CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 35(3), 482; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.