The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of [\/andamus by declaring the action of the Respondent No.6 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty of the Petitioner and also interfering into the peaceful running of 9 Barwarchi Hotel and Restaurant, which is situated at Nagarguda Village H/o Tallapally Village, Shabad Mandal. Ranga Reddy District and threatening the Petitioner to handover the Hotel of the Petitioner to the Respondent No. 7, as the Respondent No. 6 is influenced by the Respondent No. 7 this is highly illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15,21 and 3004 of constitution of lndia and also violation of principles of Natural Justice and consequently to direct the Respondent No-6 not to interfere into the Petitioner's peaceful life and liberty as well as his peaceful running of 9 Bawarchi I hotel and restaurant, located in Sy. No. 308/4, which is situated at Nagarguda Village H/o Tallapally Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. lA NO: 'f OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.6 not to interfere into the Petitioner's peaceful life and liberty as well as his peaceful running of 9 Bawarchi hotel and restaurant, located in Sy. No.30B/A, which is srtuated at Nagarguda Village H/o Tallapally Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No. 'l to 6: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No. 7: --- The Court made the following: ORDER THE TIONOUITABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN I(UMAIT OI{DER: WRIT PETI'IION No.33012 of 2025 l{eard lt'arnccl counscl for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Plcader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up {or disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This r.vrit petitior-r has becn filed seeking to declare the action of the rcspc,n('lent No.6 in intc.rfering into the petitioner's pcaccfuI life and libcrty and also interfcring into thc pcaceful running of 9 Barwarchi Hotcl and RL'staurant, rvhich is siLtratccl at Nagarguda Village H/o Tallapally Village, Shabacl Manclal. I(an11.r Redclv District and threatening the petitioner to handover the petitioner's IIotel to respondent No.Z is highly illegal, albitrary, unconstitutiona I anc'l violation of Articles 14,75,27 and 300-4 of constitutiorr of Ir-rdia anrl also violation of principles of Natural Justice arrd corsequentlv to dircct the rcsponclent No.6 not to ir-rterfele into.the petitioner's peaceful life and liberty as r,r,ell as his peaceful possession over the subject property.

3. 'totlav lvhen tho matter has b(]cn taken up for hearing, learnecl Assistant Coven-rmcnt Pleader for l-lorne appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6, placed on record instructions issuc<i by Sub-lnspector of Police, Shabad Police Station, Cybclabatl Cornntissionerate, whcr:ein it submitted that on 24.10.2025, respontlcnt No.7 locigetl a contplaint before respcrndent No.6 stating that her husband i.e., ti R;;;h usecl to run the subiect Hotel and sincc her husband tc'rok financia[ lrelp frorn his fricnds i.c.., Srinivas and Ramesh, thcy ncre also \ r- vr,orking in thc subiect hotel. It is turthcr sLrtccl that on 2{.10.2024, responclcnt No.7 husband dicd due to brain str()ke and thereafter, on 16.10.2025, when respondent No.7 nent to the subject hotcl, Sri.Srinivas and Sri.Ramesl-r along with the petitioner stated that the strbjcct hotcl bclong to them and threatened her to leave the subject property. On suclr complaint, necessary entries were rnade in the station records ancl lor thc p'ry;p65g of ent}rirv in thc matter, pctitioncr was callcrl to the police stati()n. It is furthcr subrnitted due to non co-operation of petitioner, enquirv orr tlto conrprlaint tlated 24."10.2025 is pt:nding

4. Learned Assistant Govemmcrrt Pleader for Flome submits that except conclucting irrvestigation, thc rcsponrlent.ruthorities ncithcr interfered with the petitioner's; personal life ancl lilrr,.rtv nor threatenecl the petitioncr to hanclover the subject property to responclcrrt No.7. It is further submitted that pctitioner instead of co-oper:rtirrg rr'ith thc lrcntling invtstigation had fileci this writ petition

5. Recording the submissions nrade by lcarned counsel appearing on either side and without expressing anv oPirrion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is clisposcd of clirecting rcsponrlcnt authorities to follow due procedure as contemplaterl unclcr bcforc ir.ritiatirrq action against the petitioner- It is made clear that thc pctitioncr shall co-operate with the investigation in cor-r-rplaint clatetl 24. 1 0. 2025

6. With the above dircction, this writ petition ts disposeci of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pcnding, shall stand closed. No order as to SD/- A.V.S. PRASAD PUTY REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, 4. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Rajendranagar Division, Cyberabad Commissionerate. Comm issionerate.

5. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chevella Division, Cyberabad Co m m iss io n e rate.

6. The Station House Officer, Shabad Police Station, Cyberabad 7. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUCI B. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies. MMT PVL HIGH COI',RT DATED:31 11012025 ORDER WP.No.33012 ot 2025 0tn0ym ta, o + sP,qrc Heo a DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITON WITHOUT COSTS @ t,l