TI P-allg Swaroopa v. The State of Telangana

the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mey be pteased to direct the respondents No. 4 and 5 not to dispossess/Demolish |re petitioner House bearing H No. 5-47, Adibatla Village, lbharahimpalnam I\4a1dal. Ranga Reddy without following due process of law, pending disposal of 're writ petition in the interest of iustice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MEESALA VINOD KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR MUNICIpAL ADMINISTRAT|ON AND URBAN DEVELOPMI:NT Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5: Gp FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Ms. M.BHAGyA SRI S.C. FOR MUNICIPALITIES The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE B. VIIAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33017 OF 2025 ORDER (oRAL) Leamed counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order dared 30. IO.ZO25

2. Accordingly, this writ petirion is disposed of directing respondents No.3 to 5 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the subject property bearing Municrpal House bearing No.5-47, situated at Adibatla Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, rvithout following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, stand closed. Sd/.A.SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To

1. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District' 2. The Commissioner, Adibatla Municipality, Adibatla, Ranga Reddy' 3. The Executive Engineer, R & B Department Adibatla Mandal' Ranga Reddy 4. One CC to SRI MEESALA VINOD KUIMAR, Advocate IOPUCI 5. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration. and -Urban Development' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OU l i

6. Two CCs to GP for Roads & Buildings, High Cou( for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. One CC to Ms. M.BHAGYA SRl, S C. for Municipalities [OPUC] 8. Two CD CoPies Along with a copy of the Order dated 30' 10 2025 in W P No'32921 cjf 2025 MP _ .-='4 HIGH COURT DA'IED:31 11012025 ORDER WP.No.33017 of 2025 '-<.: i rl.:. -' l.l . .t),' t-.. t: Nu! ?U5 tr.i i' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WI'THOUT COSTS \1- HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIIAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32921. OF 2025 ORDER: (oRAL) Heard Mr. Meesala Vinod Kumar. learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. M.Bhagya Sri, leamed Standing Counsel for respondent No.4; and Mr. R.Pool Singh Naik, leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings, appearing for respondent No.5; and perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner claims to have purchased the subject property bearing Municipal House bearing No.5-6, admeasuring 281 square yards, situated at Adibatla, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. under registered sale deed bearing document No.l637 of 2000 dated

17.05.2000 (Ex.P-1). The petitioner constructed the buildiug by obtaining permission from the then Govemment of Adibatla Gram Panchayat vide permit dated 22.10.1999. The subject property was assessed vide PTIN No.1201100505; electricity connection vide U.S.C. No.102435908 and water connection from HMWSSB (Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board) vide CAN No.621483464 were also provided. It is submitted that there is interference by the respondent authorities with the possession of the 2 petitioner in respect of the subject property, as such, he was constrained to approach this Cour1.

3. Leamed Standing Counsel for respondent No.4 sultmitted that road widening work is taken up by the R&B departmen I and there is no interference by the respondent No.4 officials as allegerl by the petitioner in thls writ petition.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings, basing on the written instructions dated 29.10.202 t, submitted that administrative sanction has been accorded by the Government of Telangana for the work of 'Widening and Strengtheninr3 of Road leading from Adibhatla to Mangalapall, Ranga Reddy Districrt, for Rs.2500.00 lakhs,vide R.O.Gt. No.l7, T, (R&BXR-II) Department dated 10.01.2025. Thereafter, technical sanction has been accorded to ltil/s Bhooratnam Construction Company Private Limited vde Superir tending Engineer (R&B) Rural Circle Agreement No.05/2025-26 dared 24.09.2025. The R&B Depaftment has right to way, which is 66 feet i.e. 33 feet on either side from the centre of the road. Respondent No.5 has made markings on the structures, which are coming in the rigl-rt o1'way but so far, they have not demolished any structure in the right rtI'way. . ry)/ 3

5. In view of the submissions of the leamed counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the documents relied upon by the petitioner (Ex.P- I to P-5), prima facie, the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the subject properry.

6. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents No.3 to 5 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the subject properly bearing Municipal House bearing No.5-6, admeasuring 281 square yards, situated at Adibatla, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications. if any, pending in this writ petition, stand closed. October 30,2025 RRK B. VUAYSEN REDDY,I