The High Court · 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 32990 OF 2025 Between: Sri Palle Raja Shaker Goud S/o. P. Rangaiah, Age about 42 yea$, Occ: Pvt. Employee, Rl/o H.No.2-14, Adibatla, lbharahimpatnam Mandal, Rangareddy District, Telangana State. .PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat Building, Dr. B.R. Amkedkar Bhavan, Hyderabad. 2 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Roads And Buildings Department, Secretariat Building, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Bhavan, Hyderabad

3. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy Diskict. 4. The Adibatla municipality, Rep- by its Commissioner, Adibatla, Ranga Reddy 5. The Executive Engineer, R and B Department Adibatla Mandal, Ranga Reddy ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a proper writ order or orders particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent no 4 in trying to demolish the petitioner building without issuing any notice and trying to lay road on the petitioner land by demolishing the petitioner house bearing H No. 2-14, Adibatla Village, lbharahimpatnam mandal, Ranga Reddy District without following due process of law which is being illegal, arbitrary and violate of principles of natural justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r;ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to direct the respondents No. 4 and 5 not to d ispossess/Demolis r the petitioner House bearing H.No.2-14, Adibatla Village, Ibharahimpatnam l,,liandal, Ranga Reddy without following dre process of law, pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MEESALA VINOD KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MUNICIPAL A.DMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPi,IENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Ms. M.BHAGYA SRl, S.C;. FOR MUNICIPALITIES The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE B. VIIAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32990 OF 2025 ORDER: (ORAL) Leamed counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 30.10.2025 passed by this Court in W.P. No.32921 of 2025. 2 Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents No.3 to 5 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the subject property bearing Municipal House bearing No.2- 14, situated at Adibatla Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, sta4d sloscd, Sd/.A.SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To

1. 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District' The Commissioner' Adibatla Municipality' Adibatla' Ranga Reddy The Executive Engineer, R and B Department Adibatla Mandal' Ranga Reddy One CC to SRI MEESALA VINOD KUMAR' Advocate IOPUC] l:ln",S.i,l:3,ll'i,Y:IllfiSflfSfil?'sg,.x'l"il1bt#rbanDeveropment'Hish Two CCs to GP for Roads & Buildings' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI One CC to SRI P. KRISHNA REDDY' S C for Municipalities [OPUC] Two CD CoPies Along with a copy of the Order dated 30 10'2025 in W P No 32921 ot 2O25 [ilP HIGH COURT DA'IED:31 11012025 ORDER WP.No,32990 of 2025 .-1; ,i. C '1J L 'I 1 tl I : rt Dij 206 _rr :. ji:t DISPOSING OF THE \MRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS L- "^ HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE B. VIIAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32927 OF 2025 ORDER: (ORAL) Heard Mr. Meesala Vinod Kumar. learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. M.Bhagya Sri, leamed Standing Counsel for respondent No.4; and Mr. R.Pool Singh Naik, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings, appearing for respondent No.5; and perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner claims to have purchased the subject propert) bearing Municipal House bearing No.5-6, admeasuring 281 square yards, situated at Adibatla, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, under registered sale deed bearing document No.1637 of 2000 dated

17.05.2000 (Ex.P-1). The petitioner constructed the building by obtaining permission from the then Govemment of Adibatla Gram Panchayat vide permit dated 22.10.1999. The subject property was assessed vlde PTIN No.120l 100505; electricity connection vide U.S.C. No.102435908 and water connection from HMWSSB (Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board) vide CAN No.62 1483464 were also provided. It is submitted that there is interference by the respondent authorities with the possession of the 2 petitioner in respect of the subject property, as such, he was constrained to approach th is Court

3. l-carned Standing Counsel fbr respondent No-4 s rbmitted that road widening work is taken up by the R&B departmetrr and there is no interference bv the respondent No.4 offlcials as allegetl by the petitioner in this writ petition.

4. Learned Assistant Governrnent Pleader for Roa,ls; and Buildings, basing on tlie rvritten instructions dated 29.10.201:i. submitted that administrative sanction has been accorded by thc Government of Telangana for tlie work of 'Widening and Strengthening of Road leading frorn Adibhatla to Mangalapall, Ranga Reddy Distr.ic,. for Rs.2500.00 lakhs, vide R.O.GI. No. 17, I, (R&BXR-II) Departmenl ,lated I 0.0 I .2025. Thereafter, technical sanction has been accorded to NUs Bhooratnam Construction Company Ptivate I-imited ulde Superinr ending Engineer (R&B) Rural Circle Agreement No.05/2025-26 dltr:d 24.09.2025. The R&B Department has right to way, which is 66 ftel i.e. 33 feet on either side from the centre of the road. Respondent l\,1o.5 has made markings on the structures, which are coming in the ripht of way but so far, they have not demolished any structure in the right of way. 3

5. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the documents relied upon by the petitioner (Ex.P- I to P-5), prima facie, the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the subject property

6. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents No.3 to 5 not to interlere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the subject property bearing Municipal House bearing No.5-6, admeasuring 281 square yards, situated at Adibatla, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of [aw. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, stand closed. October 30,2025 RRK B. VIIAYSEN REDDY,I